New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MEElectronics A151 Review

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 

 

MEElectronics A151 Review

 

Thanks to Frogbeats for the sample

 

SDC12259.jpg

 

First Impressions:  The box is fairly non descript, the insides are a bit too.  Nothing bad in that however, I do see something I like though.  MEElec’s little case is always a very welcome sight as all IEM’s should come with cases and MEElec is one of the few companies that seem to now always do it.  Inside the case is a heap of tips which is good.  The buds look rather large, hmm why so big and it’s a bit of a weird shape too.  I’m hoping that doesn’t cause any fit issues.

 

First listen and I’m not really that chuffed.  I know it’s got a “Siren” armature in there but it seems to have been tuned to be a little soft and fuzzy.  Hmm I’ll give them some hours just in case.

 

SDC12330.jpg

 

Source:  1G Shuffle, HiFiMAN HM-601 and the FiiO E7 + E9

 

Lows:  Well I think this is where it all revolved around.  Balanced Armatures are well known for not moving a lot of air and as such they are regarded as being rather bass light.  While some view this as a huge problem others happily take the clarity as more than ample return for sacrificing some quantity.  The tuning here has been taken to give the low end a little more expansion and fullness, in particular a bit of a mid/bass hump that leads the ear to think there more bass than there really is.  It’s also tuned to create a softer and thicker bass than the quick and punchy that BA stuff is inclined towards.  Hmm I’m not sure I like it.  It’s sacrificed the great quality for a bit of quantity and has chosen a style of presentation that to me it can’t quite do. Sometimes going for the middle way works great, sometimes it misses and I just can’t seem to enjoy the bass here.  Yes it’s better than what I’d expect form a dynamic at this price but it lacks their power and depth.  Depth is what matters as here it just doesn’t go down deep and it can’t punch hard enough to make up for that deficiency.  Maybe for you it would suit better, certainly its low end is much more present than say of the PL-50 or even the DUNU Ares.  To me its just too soft for a BA but lacks the depth of a dynamic.  A valiant effort but I feel it’s a little bit of a miss.  I guess it could make for a good transition IEM if you want to move from a dynamic to an armature maybe.

 

So yes the lows are good, detailed, airy and articulate and arguably better than any dynamic would be at the price.

 

SDC12332.jpg

 

 

Mids:  It’s a bit like the bass here too but more successfully.  Mids are very good as you would naturally expect of a BA but again it’s like they have tried to make it very dynamic like.  Make it sound big and make it a bit fuzzy rather than the more typical in your head sound.   I can see why they would but I can’t help but feel I the process they have sacrificed a lot.  Sure there is a place for the A151 but I feel the push to make it very dynamic like has been pushed to the extent it’s sacrificed more than it’s gained.  The Ares did the same but not quite taken so far, it was more of a one for one exchange.  This feels as it’s been pushed as far as it will go.  So if I stop bitching for a moment the mids here are still quite good.  They have a very open, dry airy sound that goes great with any dry vocalists.  Nora Jones sounds great on these and probably rather better than and any dynamic of the same price.  Guitars too are still quick and clean with a very open feel.  Liquid and rich stuff though doesn’t quite have the creaminess that it ought to though.  I’m finding it extremely hard not to compare these to the PL-50 given they have the same driver, I love them a lot and the best I can say about the A151 is that it’s entirely competition.

 

So yes the mids are good, detailed, airy and articulate and arguably better than any dynamic would be at the price.

 

SDC12335.jpg

 

 

Highs:  Dry, crisp and honestly a little bit gritty.  The grittiness is down to their chosen sound signature being relatively bright.  I don’t really think any BA ever gets treble right (at any price) the trouble is armatures are clean enough that if they go gritty you will be able to hear it.  A dynamic that can’t quite go there just become fuzzy and splashy so you don’t quite notice it the same.  I notice it here plenty and I know it’s a very back handed compliment but that’s just how it is.    I can’t say I love that it’s been tuned so but again I can see it being a type of sound that will be more of what’s expected by someone who’s only ever heard dynamics.  So while its probably popular I feel it’s not playing to the strengths of the driver.  Can you use a Ferrari to ferry kids around?  Sure you can but if that’s what you want it to do then why not use a Renault Espace?  In the same way you can stick a Formula 1 engine in an Espace, why would you choose to? (Note: Renault actually did this, thing was 800 bhp, top speed of 198mph and could do 0-60 in 2.8 seconds) 

 

So yes the highs are good, detailed, airy and articulate and arguably better than any dynamic would be at the price.

 

SDC12336.jpg

 

Soundstage:  Really rather good, big and very airy.  It’s pretty much the opposite of what you’d expect for a BA.  The stage feels big and expands out far and wide either side of you.  It never really wanted to put anything in front of me at any distance.  Instrument separation while decent wasn’t all I’d hope for.  It’s all just preference though rather than one being better than the other.

 

Fit:  Given they have a weird shape and big I worried a little but they fit perfectly.  Get the right tips and it was easy.

 

Comfort:  Given the size and shape I was concerned but it was unfounded.  They fit me perfectly and melted away after a few minutes.

 

Cable:  It’s a great cable, super soft and super duper flexible.  It looks boring but I love the flexibility.  MEElectronics always does great cables.

 

SDC12343.jpg

 

Microphonics:  None.

 

Accessories:  A heap of tips that are all great, quality silicon a great assortment and their usual little case that I like so.  No shirt clip but can’t think why you’d want one.

 

Amped/Unamped:  These like a bit of oomph behind them an were noticeable bettor out of the HM-601 than the shuffle, the Shuffle being naturally gritty didn’t do its gritty top end any favours either.  Really want did make a vast difference though was the adding of more impedance.  I’ve seen a couple of things change dramatically with its use and this is one of them.  It made them more resolving but removed any thickness or bass expansion too.  If you have a bass boosting amp then you can experiment using more impedance and then using the boost to restore the low end.  It really does improve the A151 greatly.  However its price bracket doesn’t really incline it to the use of amps, still if you have an E3 or 5 or 6 already spending £10ish on a 75 ohm adapter will be worth it.

 

SDC12340.jpg

 

Isolation:  Yey! A MEElectronics IEM that has no venting or air pressure issues what so ever.  Ahh this is why I love BA stuff.  They may not quite be Ety challengers but they easily isolate more than enough for to learn to look where you’re going or become a red stain on a road.  I’d happily use these on the Tube or lengthy flight.

 

Value:  Ohh ever the contentious topic.  Assuming you have read all that’s above you will be aware I’ve not exactly fallen head over heals in love with these.  Still these are a MEElectronic IEM and I’m not sure they know how to make anything that isn’t good value.  These are going for just £40 and while I don’t know if it’s what I’d take as I prefer the flavour of the DUNU Ares and I adore the wonderful PL-50.  I know what I like I love me those creamy butty mids on the PL-50.  Still if I got these as a present I’d be perfectly happy to hear them every day.  They aren’t perfect for me but are still excellent value for money.  I think if I needed an isolating all rounder these would be in with a chance of getting my money, probably between these and the Ares I think.

 

SDC12342.jpg

 

Conclusion:  I feel conflicted about these.  When I ignore everything else I like them, I on the whole enjoy them.  Okay I really wish they would sand down the treble a touch but otherwise they are nice.  The trouble is I know what the driver inside can do and it’s a great driver, a truly fantastic little driver that’s used in a million things.  It has been tuned to the very limits of where I think it can go, to make this BA not sound like a BA and I sort of see why but really I don’t understand why.  If this had been the first ever Siren based thing I’d heard I’d be really pleased with it but I know just what can be done with it.  Here it’s trying to do everything instead of playing to its strengths and I find myself being a little disappointed.  It’s not fair as it really is a good sounding IEM but it can’t hold a candle to the mids on the PL-50.  I know its lacking in the lows for many but honestly it’s a sacrifice I think is worth making to get something that excels so.  The A151 is a compromise with a little too crispy highs.  The A151 is all round very good but it doesn’t excel, it’s competent and capable rather than amazing and wonderful.

 

If I had to live with these day in, day out I’d be perfectly content to do so. They never really offend me or cause any unpleasantness but they never make me want to burst into song either.  It is very good but so too is the competition.

post #2 of 9
Thread Starter 

 

MEElectronics A151 Quick Review

 

Thanks to Frogbeats for the sample

 

Brief:  MEElectronics does a BA.

 

Price:  £39

 

Specification:  Impedance 27 Ohm Cable Length 135 cm Sensitivity 111 dB Frequency Range 20Hz - 18kHz Driver Micro balanced armature

 

Accessories:  2 Sets of Bi Flanges, 3 Silicone Ear Tips (S/M/L) and  pair of tri flanges.

 

Build Quality:  Great, the cable in particular feels fantastic.

 

Isolation:  Great stuff, it isolates among the best of the rest out there.  Perfectly adequate for the Tube or for long flights.

 

Comfort/Fit:  I did have concerns as they big and oddly shaped.  In use they were absolutely fine, just shove in and then they would just melt away.

 

Aesthetics:  Hmm they are big and silvery.  I don’t think they are very pretty but they aren’t ugly either.

 

Sound:  Very competent and capable.  They have taken a BA and pushed it to sound as much like a dynamic as they possibly can and it has had to sacrifice something along the way.  If I’d never heard anything else with the same driver then I’m sure I’d be very happy here but I know just what’s been lost and I really miss them.  Yes compared to a dynamic these have very controlled lows and stellar mids but I know what they could be.  The mids here are very open, airy and articulate but don’t possess the creamy smoothness of the PL-50 or even quite that of the DUNU Ares.  Don’t mistake my comments for saying they are bad because they are certainly not, they are very good.  The highs too are very good but I did find them to be a little over crispy up top and that lends itself to grittiness.  It’s certainly much clearer than I would expect for a comparably priced dynamic however.  I simply cannot help but feel they have not played to the strengths of the driver and have missed out on getting the very best from it even if it is still rather good.  A little better depth and the low end wouldn’t hurt either.

 

Value:  Okay so I bitch and moan but it’s still  great value for money.  I haves no doubt whatsoever that these are worth every penny as is pretty much everything MEElectronics make.  They are the masters of value for money and they always give you case so well done them!  These are very, very capable all rounder’s that make sacrifices here and there but would probably please most if not all.

 

Pro’s:   Very competent and capable all rounder.  Great isolation.

 

Con’s:  Never excels.  A touch crispy up top and bass hasn’t the best extension.

 

 

post #3 of 9

I just got these headphones as well, and while i LOVE the bass on these and the soundstage is amazing for a single BA. BUT i find the treble to be extremely rolled off! do changing tips or amping them improve the highs at all?

post #4 of 9
Thread Starter 

i found as i said that adding impedance helped them, better treble clarity but it did take the bass down a notch, depending on budget give them impedance and a FiiO and you should notice a real improvement for your 20ish units of a major currency.

 

also glad you like them.

post #5 of 9

alright i'll check it out, once again, great review!

post #6 of 9

Hello

 

The thing with IEMs is that the sound depends so much on the tips you use and probably also on your own ear canal shape...

 

Just got my A151 from Amazon yesterday, so I didn't have much time to try them

 

At first glance, they sound very different to my old PL-50, much more bass for example, and much better isolation with default tips

 

But, you know what? I tried the A151 tips on the PL-50 for a better comparison... and miracle !!! all the missing bass in PL-50 suddenly shows, and it also loses some of its clarity on mids.

 

I'm not an audiphile at all, but when using the same tips (medium silicon tips from A151), I find that both A151 and PL-50 sound very very similar, if not the same...

Anyone tried this and can post impressions?

 

Regards

post #7 of 9

i believe the a151 and pl50 are based on the same siren driver, so its no surprise that they share similarities in sound

post #8 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoenn041 View Post

i believe the a151 and pl50 are based on the same siren driver, so its no surprise that they share similarities in sound



That makes a lot of sense... and would prove that IEMs sound relies so much on the tips used, and how crappy tips can spoil the sound signature of a good IEM like PL-50

 

post #9 of 9



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by yolan View Post

 

I'm not an audiphile at all, but when using the same tips (medium silicon tips from A151), I find that both A151 and PL-50 sound very very similar, if not the same...

Anyone tried this and can post impressions


Sure I'm not an audiphile.. I can't tell what I'd be listening that led me to post the above comment...blink.gif

 

After some more testing and A/B-ing... yeah, the PL50 improve using better tips, and the sound signature is quite similat to that of A151.. but there ARE differences.

 

Bass is heavier in A151, voices a bit recessed when compared to PL50, but still very present and sweet. I'm still deciding which ones I like best happy_face1.gif, although unfortunately I'll soon have to forget about my PL50 as they seem to have aproblem with the jack and they lose sound sometimes...

 


Edited by yolan - 12/24/11 at 9:08am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: