Quote:
Originally Posted by
davidcotton 
Minerva (also uk based, silicone) ask for impressions to be taken without bite block. In my experience (which has been a pita quite honestly!) I could tell no difference closed or open.
Now this is said not so much for a vent (though there will be an element of that),I just want to try and pinpoint why customs for me has been such a git to get done.
Basically my story is that I originally got interested in customs as I can wear iems all day if I want at work. Isolation is important to me as I work in a noisy environment. However my right ear never got as good a fit as my left. My left for some reason would take almost any tip and get a good seal from it, my right not so much.
So I got in touch with fisher in the states and get some impressions done as per instructions. Let's just say that things didn't go well. Right ear would always be too short. For some reason it would always be cut too short. Went back for refit, same issue. 3-4 (I lose count but it would be about that)refits (at least two sets of new impressions)as well and still didn't get anywhere. So gave up in frustration.
After awhile I decided to give customs another shot. This time I figured it would be better if I went with Minerva in the uk. Got the impressions done (by this time I'm pretty much on first name terms with my audiologist :) ) Wait the 15 days and get them back. To my dismay I now had fit issues on my LEFT ear (and the right whilst better wasn't great). So got in touch and had them back for a refit. Got a little better but still not great. Left ear could really tell that they were in there and was tired after about 20 minutes or so of wearing them. Had another refit but that didn't solve it. Was almost a relief when the left monitor died as it meant I could get a refund. So there we go. I am now on my third and last Custom manufacturer. Will see how Cosmic Ears (and I'm only going with them as they have really good prices) get on but one way or another this is my last attempt.
Now to the point of that long winded post (I just wanted to establish whats happened). I have had my ears cleaned out of wax before each time if it's needed it, I've followed the instructions of each company (open for fisher and Cosmic, closed for minerva) and not had any real luck with any of them (cosmic excepted who I'm in the process of atm). Any ideas? Any one else had this amount of hassle (I understand that at least one refit is likely but what I've posted doesn't seem normal). Audiologist even said that my ears didn't look "that" different to any others she'd seen.
Oh and to add insult to injury my westone 3s that I'd got to tide me over till customs are ready have just gone through the wash!
Cheers
Ever heard of the Law of Attraction? You may now be expecting the fit to be substandard and therefore getting exactly what you're expecting...
LOL.
That aside, have you considered the possibility that you may, perhaps, be tensing (or moving) your facial muscles whilst the impressions are curing?
Alternatively I did read somewhere (sorry, I honestly don't recall where) that some people have ear canal anatomy that varies much more from one facial expression / jaw position to another, and this would obviously pose potential problems for a CIEM. If, perhaps, you are one of these relatively rare individuals, then perhaps it might be worth having some acrylic CIEMs made from a set of impressions done without a bite block...
I have experience of silicone CIEMs too (SE-5). I did as instructed and had those particular impressions done without a bite block. I got a good fit but my ears do feel rather 'stuffed' with silicone CIEMs. I speculate (it's purely speculation on my part) that silicone CIEMs may be 'wax-dipped' in a different manner than that of acrylic CIEMs. With acrylic CIEMs, the impression is modeled and then literally dipped in wax, an investment mould then made, and an acrylic shell taken from that investment, and this acrylic shell then sanded and buffed.
I do not know the exact method of making silicone CIEMs, but I suspect it may be that an investment mould is made, as per the acrylic method, but then diverging in the sense that the investment mould be stuffed with components and silicone added, the resultant CIEM then, itself being dipped in silicone, with, of course, no buffing ever taking place. I could be completely wrong about this. If I'm right, though, I speculate that the silicone, in its fluid state, might be more viscous than the wax used in the acrylic CIEM process. Perhaps this (along with the lack of buffing) might go some way to explaining why silicone CIEMs seem, at least in my limited experience, to be a slightly more bulky fit than acrylic CIEMs.
If anyone can concur or correct me, I welcome any clarification on this. I'd love to learn how silicone CIEMs are made.