Balanced SS Amps to put in your shopping list - Page 3

A couple local audiophile friends upgraded from initial 2000 dollar system and up all the way to a 30,000 dollar system and in the process they may have spent more than 40,000 - 70,000 dollars switching from system to system (hi-fi system, not headphone system). With pre-amp / headphone amp, I would set maximum budget, let the system serve me at least a good 10 years. Until I strike lottery, or get really rich in between...

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnwmclean 

 

 

Off topic sorry...
There’s probably not a lot of sonic benefit I agree,

I do however feel that a fully differential approach from DAC chip to driver is an elegant approach, for me balanced is all about “potential”.

Piece of mind that an optimum has been implemented.  

 

X2
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by fishski13 

 

well, with that B22 he can easily switch between unbalanced/balanced on the fly for comparisons.  maybe the BM DAC1 sounds better balanced, but there was a definite improvement.  i didn't want to hear a difference for some of the reasons you cited.
 

 

X2 Would be fun to have 2 headphones running concurrent too, as long as it doesn't fry the lower impendence / higher sensitivity phone
 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik 


X2
If you have to have balanced, get a Beta22, Dynamid or Dynamight.
If you want to run the HD-800 nicely, consider something like the Zana Deux. The HD-800 is better with tubes.
As for balanced, it's mostly marketing silliness.
Do you need to drive a line over several hundred feet? Likely not. Do you have a significant problem with channel separation or line noise? Probably not, and a good single-ended amp won't have those problems. Do you need a lot of power? Bridging amps delivers more power, but it costs less to use a more powerful single-ended amp.
Those are the benefits to running balanced. Do you really need it?
Then again, "balanced" is a status symbol. Do you want to drop an extra four figures for that?

Thanks UE. Great advice as before. I would say answers are ''no'' to most of them, minus line noise, plus considering adding HE6 into my current collection, and extending the use of pre-amp for my future speaker setup. Yeah my friends whose own those crazy hi-fi systems are brain washing me everyday with their furutech interconnect and power cables, so far I am trying very hard resisting those things, but wouldn't mind going balanced. You'll get the picture :)

My current budget would allow me to consider balanced, Beta22 is over though. My friend just rejected my request to build Beta22 so I'm currently out of luck in Malaysia. In fact he just sold all his DIY parts and turned to commercial systems. Thinking over tubes now...

Quote:

Originally Posted by jc9394 

Depends what kind of tubes you have and what mod is in the WA22.  I can tell you that a tubes can be more than half of WA22.

 

Yes, Corey of SWA built it.  You can contact him on pricing.  I requested few upgrades.  Like Gold Point Stepped Attenuator and loop out.

 

Thanks jc9394 for your information. I put SWA link in 1st post for Beta22 reference.

Wow looks like some good homework (and money) required on tubes too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jc9394 

I have Furutech interconnect and Silver Dragon with Furutech connectors but not really sure it is much better or not.  I don't heard much differences on the cable.  On the power cable, I use the Cisco one from the enterprise level switches, it is thick and if it is good for Cisco and it should good for my system.

 

On commercials headphone amps, I have heard few $2000+ amp but nothing come close to beta22.

 

Oh my friend is running on speakers, not headphones. He's setup is at insane level (30,000) that i would not be able to budget for with my current stage. This is probably still consider normal for a speaker system though... He used to DIY his DAC, pre-amp and amp, but now runs a complete commercial system.

On cable I would believe a reasonable priced good cable will reduce noise, noticeable improvement on sound, but I'm skeptical about the "heavens" that a $$$$$ cable brings :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by jc9394 

OneSec, you shuold really try your HD800 with tubes.  Yes, it is a pain to get the good/proper tubes to match the headphone but that is part of the fun.  Since you are in Asia, you should not have issues getting good NOS tubes.  My HD800 will be primary connect to WA22...and the LCD-2 will be beta22.

 

 

Urgh this is so tempting. But having something that weight 20kg built in US, and to ship to Malaysia (if I can find someone), possibly without the VAT (who wants to pay more ), and after the rough custom handling, hopping it will run flawlessly upon first connect... Needs a couple miracles.

One question for HD800 on WA22 / Beta22 - Which is better for orchestra / chamber music? I'm after good instrument separation, accuracy,  analytical. Vocal is not my main interest. I'm always given the impression that tube is good for vocal, same as woodies, as such I wasn't very keen after the tubes since day 1. I might get a vocal phone to pair with my amp if necessary, but HD800 will be my main classical can for sure.

Possible this thread is bringing some good interest? :)