How are the Beats Pro, Detox and Studios? - Page 10

I just hate the natural frequency response of my beats pro's, but I absolutely love the sound of them once I have dropped the lows and boosted the highs. I just feel like other than their crappy response, they are wonderful headphones. I don't even feel like they are a bad deal at all (like every other beats set of headphones in existence) because after I put clean, powerful signal into them, I don't think they can beat for a set of durable cans. I own a set of HD 800's that I can't even listen to with my normal music. That 6000 hz boost is so painful. Sure they can't be beat for sound quality recorded tracks, but for everything else, I prefer a quiet but thumpy low end, and narrow sound stage. So yeah, I use my eq'd beats more often than my hd 800's.

Terrible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by steffanan 

I just hate the natural frequency response of my beats pro's, but I absolutely love the sound of them once I have dropped the lows and boosted the highs. I just feel like other than their crappy response, they are wonderful headphones. I don't even feel like they are a bad deal at all (like every other beats set of headphones in existence) because after I put clean, powerful signal into them, I don't think they can beat for a set of durable cans. I own a set of HD 800's that I can't even listen to with my normal music. That 6000 hz boost is so painful. Sure they can't be beat for sound quality recorded tracks, but for everything else, I prefer a quiet but thumpy low end, and narrow sound stage. So yeah, I use my eq'd beats more often than my hd 800's.

try the HD 650s out, i think you will enjoy them alot.

Hey everybody

I was planning to invest in a pair of Beats Pro, but I would like to know is there is a better option at the same price, no more, no less. So far I really like the Beats, but I want to hear opinions of others. Note, I need headphones with top quality sound, since Im a musician and the headphones are for my studio. thanks! 

If you value sound quality at all, then don't buy any headphones in the beat range.

If you're buying them just to look cool and to impress your mates, then buy one of those fake pairs for $20. (They'll probably still sound better than the real thing)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jowiesax19 

Hey everybody

 

I was planning to invest in a pair of Beats Pro, but I would like to know is there is a better option at the same price, no more, no less. So far I really like the Beats, but I want to hear opinions of others. Note, I need headphones with top quality sound, since Im a musician and the headphones are for my studio. thanks! 

I have a pair of Sony MDR-V55 headphones that you can buy in the UK for under £40 ($60) and they blow the beats away in terms of sound quality and build quality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sound Quest 

 

I have a pair of Sony MDR-V55 headphones that you can buy in the UK for under £40 ($60) and they blow the beats away in terms of sound quality and build quality.

LOL no. beats maybe over priced but that is a riduclous statement mate. the v55 are not even better than the solo hd. Beats pros are decent headphones very fun to listen to. I compared the pros to many headphones a few that they beat out are the ath m50, V moda m80 & m100. xb500 and xb700. The only cheap headphone that beats the pros are the shure440 but ot be fair in terms of clairty they beat my d2000 for clairty. like i said very overpriced but peiople get a bit carried away sometimes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReem 

LOL no. beats maybe over priced but that is a riduclous statement mate. the v55 are not even better than the solo hd. Beats pros are decent headphones very fun to listen to. I compared the pros to many headphones a few that they beat out are the ath m50, V moda m80 & m100. xb500 and xb700. The only cheap headphone that beats the pros are the shure440 but ot be fair in terms of clairty they beat my d2000 for clairty.

Well we'll agree to disagree then.

For me, the  V55's have a far more balanced sound than the beat pros, which just sound boomy and make the mid-range sound like mud.

I don't believe that you've tried the V55's, so aren't in a position to make a comparison.

LOL i have owned them, How can you claim that someone hasn't tried them? The bass on the pros does not even go into the mids. The beats solo are an example of going into the mids. The pro can be a bit muddy sometimes with certain songs but they do have a clarity to them they also have nice bass and it's decent quality. Is it £200-300 quality absolutly not but to say a rubbish pair of headphones that are muddy sounding like the V55 is better than the flagship pro model that competes with good quality headphones in the £100-150 is just plain hating.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheReem 

LOL i have owned them, How can you claim that someone hasn't tried them? The bass on the pros does not even go into the mids. The beats solo are an example of going into the mids. The pro can be a bit muddy sometimes with certain songs but they do have a clarity to them they also have nice bass and it's decent quality. Is it £200-300 quality absolutly not but to say a rubbish pair of headphones that are muddy sounding like the V55 is better than the flagship pro model that competes with good quality headphones in the £100-150 is just plain hating.

I still much prefer my v55's.

I've had them for over a year now and use them daily and they still show little to no signs of cosmetic wear. Unlike the beats where the headband has a high likely hood of snapping in half after a few months of usage.

You said that the beat pros are "fun sounding". Which is fine, some people prefer a big bassy sound over a more natural balanced sound. But I just prefer my music to sound more accurate. (No tracks sound muddy on the v55's, unless they're very badly mastered)

The original solos had snapping problems near the hinge for a while then monster upgraded the headband to make it more flexible, I would class the studios as average in terms of durability nothing overly special and not terrible either. Pros are decent but if you drop them on the cup it can pop out but they won't break to easy. The v55 same deal with the studios really average durability imo.  I wouldn't class any of them natural sounding including the v55. It's hard to get a natural sounding or even clean sounding headphone under £100 here in uk the only one is the shure 440 at £60-79 but they are under priced in the uk and compete with headphones double the price beating many of them. If your prefer the v55 over the pro then hats off to you we all have different opinions but to stateit as fact is a different story and that's when it becomes a debate. for a fair comparison of the beats pro vs another well regarded headphone read the m50 vs beats pro comparison someone did.

The solo HD retail for £120-160 but sound like a £50 headphone

Studio Retail for £225-270 but sound like a £70 headphone

pro retail £300-400 they sound like £100 

I'm not trying to state my opinion as fact, so I apologize if I come across that way.

I bought the V55's when they were fairly new and paid £75 for them. But even then, I thought it was a bargain at that price.

I should also note that the V55's still retail at around £100 in many UK stores. Well worth the £40 that amazon are asking for them.

I'd take them over the beat solo & pros everytime. (Can't comment on the studios as i've never tested them, although they seem to get a bigger negative reception than the solos and pros).