Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › New Audeze LCD3
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New Audeze LCD3 - Page 506

post #7576 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoom25 View Post

Let me change that to more mid bass kick on the LCD-2 and a bit more sub bass on the LCD-3. Better bass quality all around by a decent margin on the LCD-3.

 

  ^

This

post #7577 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoom25 View Post

Let me change that to more mid bass kick on the LCD-2 and a bit more sub bass on the LCD-3. Better bass quality all around by a decent margin on the LCD-3.

That's the stange thing. My LCD-3's seem to have more mid bass kick than my LCD-2's. But then again they have a mid bass hump on the graph...

post #7578 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

That's the stange thing. My LCD-3's seem to have more mid bass kick than my LCD-2's. But then again they have a mid bass hump on the graph...

 

Oh I looked at your graph again and I see that small hump around 50 Hz.

 

I'm not using any eq but I sometimes do just for the sake of "trying".  So, if you have the possibility to do so with your equipment, tame those 50 Hz by 3 dB with a narrow filter and see what it does (just out of curiosity I would say).

post #7579 of 9396

I tried with the foobar eq but it seems that it completely ruins the sound. It sounds... distorted

post #7580 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

I tried with the foobar eq but it seems that it completely ruins the sound. It sounds... distorted

 

Mmmmh, I see :(  That's what I meant by "I don't use any eq (but just for trying)": it can always cause frequency (wanted of course but also unwanted) and phase distorsion ...

 

All I can say is: kudos to the small and overlooked Cowon X9 (or i9 or ...) for its more than decent DAC/pre-amp quality, especially when used with an amp, and for its fairly transparent eq.  But the eq doesn't allow you to go below the 80 Hz setting, so it's pretty much useless for what we were intending to do in your case for example.


Edited by CoolBurn - 6/23/13 at 2:52am
post #7581 of 9396

My LCD experience would concur that the LCD-2 has more drive down low, the LCD-3 more extension.  More impact or deeper, pick your poison.  My money is the difference being the pad softness of the LCD-3 creating a better seal and therefore deeper bass.

post #7582 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

I tried with the foobar eq but it seems that it completely ruins the sound. It sounds... distorted

 

It's well known to be bad. Try this for example: http://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_dsp_xgeq

post #7583 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

That's the stange thing. My LCD-3's seem to have more mid bass kick than my LCD-2's. But then again they have a mid bass hump on the graph...

 

Lucky man. Although I am not complaining about by pair...yet.biggrin.gif

post #7584 of 9396

And I'm not complaining about my ... PAIR ... either ph34r.gif

post #7585 of 9396

Yeah, but my LCD-3's are not perfectly flat like others are :)

post #7586 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

The really strange thing is that my LCD-3's seem to have more bass than my LCD-2's :)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by citraian View Post

That's the stange thing. My LCD-3's seem to have more mid bass kick than my LCD-2's. But then again they have a mid bass hump on the graph...

I have the opposite...

 

My LCD-2's were like that, with a mid bass bump, sort of a zig-zag with a cut in the sub-bass. Speaking strictly of the bass response, and only from my first listening session with the LCD-3's last night, I can say the 2's had a bit more punch in the bass. The 3's certainly have more sub-bass. I was noticing sub-bass parts in music that jumped out at me. I didn't get that with the 2's. The 3's don't have as strong as punch, but the entire bass response seems more even and neutral. 

 

It's hard to say if the 2's had that same sub-bass, maybe it was there, just masked by the hump in the mid bass? Both presentations are enjoyable, just different. Maybe also the thicker membrane on the 2's just are more efficient at moving bass notes. ?? hmm. Who knows. I do like the more even bass presentation of the LCD-3. I thought the bass on the 2's was a bit much at times. Between the LCD-2 carrying more weight in the bass (as I've read) plus that mid-bass bump...a bass-heads dream, though!

 

The graphs from my 2 pairs correlate with this....and the listening differences/observations are certainly real and noticeable. Not just an artifact of suggestion by seeing the charts first. Most LCD-2 charts I've seen are very flat through the bass, I hadn't seen a lot like mine with that zig-zag. 

 

I don't put too much into the treble measurements on these charts, though. I read they are very susceptible to change due to headphone placement during testing, etc. 

 

The LCD-2:

 

 

The LCD-3:

 

post #7587 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solude View Post

My LCD experience would concur that the LCD-2 has more drive down low, the LCD-3 more extension.  More impact or deeper, pick your poison.  My money is the difference being the pad softness of the LCD-3 creating a better seal and therefore deeper bass.

 

^

This :)

 

If the pads do not make a good seal around the ear, the mid bass starts to be over pronounced and a bit loose. I wonder if those citing the LCD-3 as having more mid-bass kick are not getting the good seal from the pads they should have. This could be due to the shape of their head, hair position, or the pads not being so well formed. If I pull the cups slightly away from my ears when listening the mid bass gets a boost. However, it is at the expense of the sub bass. My experience as that the LCD-2.2 had more bass punch and the LCD-3s more extension (and definition), as others have stated.

post #7588 of 9396

Still in the burn-in phase, so I won't comment too much on sound (differences) yet but these LCD-3 earpads are really something.  Anyone else hear their heartbeat?

post #7589 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPR8R View Post

Still in the burn-in phase, so I won't comment too much on sound (differences) yet but these LCD-3 earpads are really something.  Anyone else hear their heartbeat?

 

I already heard it (because of the earpads I mean, and that's what you mean too, don't you ?).  But that's none of a concern as soon as there is some music playing, and it's not necessarily always audible even when no music is playing.

post #7590 of 9396
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolBurn View Post

 

I already heard it (because of the earpads I mean, and that's what you mean too, don't you ?).  But that's none of a concern as soon as there is some music playing, and it's not necessarily always audible even when no music is playing.

Yeah, I meant because of the seal caused by these earpads.  It's not a concern really, more of an observation in comparing the LCD-2 (Bamboo) to the LCD-3.  

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › New Audeze LCD3