Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Audio Technica CK100 PRO! ATH-W3000ANV!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Audio Technica CK100 PRO! ATH-W3000ANV! - Page 4

post #46 of 57
12/4/11 at 9:42am

Can't wait to hear from other members.


Edited by Bokyung - 12/4/11 at 7:06pm
Reply
post #47 of 57
12/11/11 at 8:37am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post


I am getting both CK100 Pro and XBA-4. Can't wait. 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

Can't wait to hear from other members.

My CK100Pro has been with me for about a week now, will be posting my unboxing + listening impressions shortly in a dedicated thread. smily_headphones1.gif

So Bokyung when are yours arriving? biggrin.gif We need your CK100Pro vs XBA-4 comparison!

@evolutionx: Hey there, glad to see another fellow countrymate around here owning the CK100Pros as well. Sorry you mind if I ask you do you happen to surf around HardwareZone? I actually posted an enquiry to you on kiteki's thread, but you seemed to ignore me. redface.gif
Edited by Haonan - 12/11/11 at 8:41am
Reply
post #48 of 57
12/12/11 at 5:22am
Okay my review is finally up. biggrin.gif You guys should see it on the first page. Long-time lurker and infrequent poster around here, so my apologies if I don't respond that quickly in that thread, but you guys can always post questions on my thread and I will try to answer each of your enquiries about the CK100PRO.

Cheers.
Reply
post #49 of 57
12/13/11 at 2:24am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haonan View Post


My CK100Pro has been with me for about a week now, will be posting my unboxing + listening impressions shortly in a dedicated thread. smily_headphones1.gif
So Bokyung when are yours arriving? biggrin.gif We need your CK100Pro vs XBA-4 comparison!
@evolutionx: Hey there, glad to see another fellow countrymate around here owning the CK100Pros as well. Sorry you mind if I ask you do you happen to surf around HardwareZone? I actually posted an enquiry to you on kiteki's thread, but you seemed to ignore me. redface.gif


Hi Haonan, great review and sorry for not responding.  I have been enjoying your great knowledge on all gadgets on hwz forums, including J-phone, cameras, laptops, head-fi, etc.     I love all kinds of gadgets and I can share your enthusiasm as well.    Thanks for sharing and hope to catch up one day.   

 

Reply
post #50 of 57
1/18/12 at 8:41pm

 

 CKW1000ANV - so nice, just landed here in Melbourne smile.gif

 

 IMG_1114.JPG

 

IMG_1124.JPG

Reply
post #51 of 57
2/17/12 at 9:18am

FWIW ...

a decent and RELATIVELY flat FR as measured by sonove ...

http://sonove.angry.jp/sudio_technica_ath_ck100pro.html

 

 

Reply
post #52 of 57
2/17/12 at 9:24am

Not that flat, a bit v-shaped. 


Edited by Inks - 2/17/12 at 9:28am
Reply
post #53 of 57
2/17/12 at 9:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaman View Post

FWIW ...

a decent and RELATIVELY flat FR as measured by sonove ...

http://sonove.angry.jp/sudio_technica_ath_ck100pro.html

 

 

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inks View Post

Not that flat, a bit v-shaped. 


I've been looking for a CK100PRO frequency response graph for some time now, so is it a more balanced or v-shaped sound?  Where exactly is there an emphasis in the frequencies - if any?

 

Reply
post #54 of 57
2/18/12 at 12:01am

The problem i see with that response is the fact that 300-2k get the least emphasis and this is where most of the music resides. The bass boost looks really adequate as there isn't too much bass, the boost is small. Treble is boosted, but looks to be a tiny bit much, may be a bit too forward at times. 

 

I like fact that the impedance phase is the opposite of the frequency response, so boosting impedance to a certain level may yield a sweetspot of balance. 


Edited by Inks - 2/18/12 at 12:02am
Reply
post #55 of 57
2/18/12 at 7:27am

I've been preaching the AT CK10 sermon since 2008. I'm devout. Who knows, I may go for it. I thought I was done, I really did. My wife did, too. She was happy then.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokyung View Post

CK100 Pro looks really ugly. Will wait until someone reviews it, but knowing me... I am a huge sucker for AT's iems so I will probably end up buying it. Thank god I didn't pull any trigger on headphones/iems yet since I had a hunch more new stuff would be released.

 

Might buy W3000 if I have a chance.



 

Reply
post #56 of 57
2/18/12 at 7:33am

Nothing wrong with curves, nothing at all... hmmmm.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaman View Post

FWIW ...

a decent and RELATIVELY flat FR as measured by sonove ...

http://sonove.angry.jp/sudio_technica_ath_ck100pro.html

 

 



 



Quote:
Originally Posted by Inks View Post

Not that flat, a bit v-shaped. 



 

Reply
post #57 of 57
2/18/12 at 8:32am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inks View Post

The problem i see with that response is the fact that 300-2k get the least emphasis and this is where most of the music resides. The bass boost looks really adequate as there isn't too much bass, the boost is small. Treble is boosted, but looks to be a tiny bit much, may be a bit too forward at times. 

 

I like fact that the impedance phase is the opposite of the frequency response, so boosting impedance to a certain level may yield a sweetspot of balance. 


Thank you for the detailed explaination Inks.  I understand better now.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Audio Technica CK100 PRO! ATH-W3000ANV!