Originally Posted by Craigster75
I have a suggestion. In an effort to respect everyone's sonic preferences, perhaps the list has become TOO inclusive. While I give huge props to Parall3l for this thread which is one of the most popular on Head-fi and the tremendous effort and commitment to manage the list, it is so large as to be overwhelming for anyone making a reasonable comparison for a basshead can purchase. Perhaps we could enact a nomination system for removal as well as additions with the initial nomination and 4 additional in agreement (5 total). While this should also be a democratic process, I believe voters should have "X" # of posts on this forum or Head-fi to avoid random voting/nominations from pranksters and/or newbies who may not yet have the experience to make an informed nomination. Thoughts?
Yup, I agree that voting can be used to determine the inclusion of a basshead can into the list.
However, the only problem is voting can be a very long, drawn-out process. Nevertheless, I can volunteer to keep tabs on the votes.
We can do it like this -
1) Take a handful of cans (say 10 to begin with, in alphabetical order)
2) Have people vote/comment on them
3) Once a can has at least 5 votes, and at least 3/5 of them are yes, we will include them
4) Posters are also encouraged to state their level of experience with said cans (whether you own them, or have thoroughly auditioned them)
What do you guys think?