The Basshead Club - Page 288

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckle490 

I shall take that advice. Thanks.

When double amping, be sure to use the LOD with the E11, then connect the ZO2 to the mini jack on the E11.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jlox1 

I'm afraid any headphone from Ultrasone will make me look like a fool lol I have to wear these in public 90% of the time !

Well, I love the look of Ultrasone cans, so I'll take one out anytime. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jlox1 

Don't get me wrong its not about aesthetics much but I had the Shire Srh750 DJ and it was extremely big and bulky on my head and I looked crazy lol.

The SRH750DJ isn't a really big circumaural can for me. It's the norm in size, but there are definitely bigger, "portable" cans out there. Take a look at the M50, for one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jlox1 

What do you guys know about the pioneer HDJ 1000 and the HDJ1500. preferably the 1500 I haven't heard them yet . I rally liked the 1000 though

As I mentioned earlier, I haven't heard the HDJ-1500, but I love my other Pioneer cans (500, 1000, 2000). They are generally detailed sounding, with a good bass punch. Bass quantity goes down and sound quality goes up as the model numbers increase. I suppose the HDJ-1500 would be an intermediary between the HDJ-1000 and HDJ-2000, 2 cans which are already quite difficult to separate in terms of pure sound quality. If you can get a decent price on the HDJ-1000, you should just get one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craigster75 

When double amping, be sure to use the LOD with the E11, then connect the ZO2 to the mini jack on the E11.

I was gonna PM you this as soon as my BH came in, but this answers it lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuckle490 

Thanks for all the help you guys! Where exactly would my next upgrade be once I have a pure silver lod and a pure silver 3.5mm to 3.5mm interconnect and the ZO2?

What's your source? 

Every DAP has a different digital-analogue chip (DAC) and some do it better than others. If you have an external amp, then getting a DAP with a powerful amp is redundant (unless you're trying to power orthos) but there's some pretty decent players out there with even more decent DACs built in. I have an iPod Touch G3 and I've come to understand that the Cirrus chip in it is like 95% of what some of the better Wolfson DACs can acheive, so I'm entirely happy with it

I made a video of unboxing my M-100's http://youtu.be/4JdNVNPWqyc
 

Look into it, I think the DAC in that gen of Classics is of lesser quality than the iPhone 4s (which TMU is a close second in terms of DAC quality only to the GS3 when it comes to smartphones used for media players, but not by a lot) for example.

Anyways I'm pretty sure Fiio has some affordable DACs. Personally if I ever felt the need to 'upgrade' my sound, I'd probably end up getting a new/better DAP than a nother peice to the chain

Not every DAC can bypass the internal DAC of the iPod, isn't it only certain ones like the Fostex HP-P1 and the Vamp?

Hm, true. Perhaps someone else can pipe in here, I'm not an expert on DACs or amps, but you may be right. I think unless you're using a USB LOD then you'll be using the internal DAC of the iPod, and not all DAC/amps offer that.

Ugh the Vamp/Verza is a love-hate thing for me. The functionality of it is so enticing, but the price makes me stay FAR away. I feel like I'd be better off with a GS3 and a decent portable amp for the same price.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apo0th3karY 

Hm, true. Perhaps someone else can pipe in here, I'm not an expert on DACs or amps, but you may be right. I think unless you're using a USB LOD then you'll be using the internal DAC of the iPod, and not all DAC/amps offer that.

Ugh the Vamp/Verza is a love-hate thing for me. The functionality of it is so enticing, but the price makes me stay FAR away. I feel like I'd be better off with a GS3 and a decent portable amp for the same price.

Neither am I mate, but I would like to hear someone explain it.

I would never consider buying the VAMP, I don't want to be locked to my 4s because of it. Plus my 4s is a 16 GB. I'm interested in the Verza if I can get some serious upgrade in SQ from it. I kind of want to try double-amping it, or any other DAC/amp that bypasses my iPod's internal DAC with the ZO2.3. 

Yeah I was just trying to be helpful  witht he limited amount of DAC knowledge I have. As for the Vamp, I hate devices that are so specificly functional, I was more referring the the universal Verza lol. The Vamp is an expensive iPhone 4s sound upgrade and nothing else.

Might want to check out the CEntrance HiFi-M8, and add it to your short list with the Verza and HP-P1. Good luck though, let me know what you've found, I'm interested in your end results :)

I think the HiFi-M8 would be the most transparent of the the three, combining that with the ZO2.3 could be amazing. Of course the price tag on all these devices is steep, very steep.

I wouldn't worry about upgrading the DAC if I were you. If you play songs that are in 44.1/16, you won't see any benefit of upgrading the DAC. Probably the best, most trouble-free method of upgrading your rig is to get a FiiO L9. It's an LOD cable for any Apple devices pre-IP5 (unless you have a lightning adapter), and it will allow you to achieve a pseudo-line-out from the device. It will be louder than the headphone out, but you will still be able to use various eq effects, which is a sign that the amp is still being used (hence, the word pseudo-line-out).

There's no way to achieve a true line-out on the iPod Classic. Well, I don't think there is. I remember seeing an iPod Classic with line out cable sticking out behind the player (they soldered the cable somewhere on the PCB to bypass the amp, I think), but that's just too much work, imo. You can also take a look at RockBoxing your iPod Classic. I'm not going to go through the reasons why because the link I gave you will describe everything for you. Personally, I think that it should be a requirement for anyone who has a Classic.