Kittens are okay. The sound signature is too warm for me, and the treble's scratchy.
Recent Images In This Thread
- productAudeze LCD2 Planar Magnetic Headphonestagged by System, 9/26/11
- brandCavalli Audiotagged by System, 9/29/11
- productCowon J3 Portable Media Player 32GB - Whitetagged by System, 9/26/11
- categoryHeadphonestagged by System, 9/26/11
- productHiFiMAN HE-500tagged by System, 9/26/11
- categoryOver Eartagged by System, 9/26/11
- brandSchiittagged by System, 9/29/11
Related Forum Threads
- HE-500 (or LCD2) Questions + Amp and DAC matching Last post on 9/21/11 at 3:13pm in Headphones (full-size)
- Would I enjoy the Audeze-LCD-2/3? Last post on 4/21/15 at 1:06pm in Headphones (full-size)
- Why is detachable headphone cables not a standard feature amongst expensive headphones? Last post on 4/27/14 at 9:47pm in Headphones (full-size)
- Just got into high end head audio, upgrade from HD600 to what? LCD , HE500 or??? Last post on 1/25/12 at 10:19am in Headphones (full-size)
- [Mini-Review] I LOVE THE LCD2.2! ^_^ Last post on 1/9/12 at 12:02pm in Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
Last edited: 7/14/15
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (Desktop Amps & DACs) 2Last edited: 6/26/15
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (Ultra-High-End Headphones (Summit-Fi))Last edited: 7/28/15
- Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2Last edited: 9/19/11
- Headphone ImpedanceLast edited: 8/18/12
Everybody knows Sennheiser. They are doing great job at delivering good sound for all prices. I am doing this review with price factor in thought. First of all it is suprisingly detailed sounding...
Wow. There doesn’t seem to be a more appropriate way to word the beginning of this review, than to simply express my genuine surprise, and indeed – to a certain extent – admiration of the UMi Voix...
I bought the Q Audio French Silk balanced cable for my Audeze LCD-3's mainly because of the ergonomics and cool design/look over the stock cables. When running balanced, I doubted I would hear much...
I got a pair of these new on Amazon about a month and a half ago. I thought they sounded great for a pair of closed on-ears, and were pretty decently comfortable to the point that listening to...
At the time of the review, the Audioquest Nighthawk headphone was on sale at TTJV Audio’s website. Here is a link to Todd’s listing of the...
** Confessions of a Failing Audiophile ** - I hated the LCD2 - Page 2post #16 of 6319/25/11 at 9:07am
Gear mentioned in this thread:post #17 of 6319/25/11 at 9:16ampost #18 of 6319/25/11 at 9:29amThread Starter
I answered that in the third paragraph :)
and thanks for agreeing, please watch out for the lynch mob that is now after you and I lol, I hear the cave under the waterfall is a place they wont look for us, we can camp out there for a while until that pitch fork mob clears outpost #19 of 6319/25/11 at 9:32amQuote:Originally Posted by swbf2cheater
I answered that in the third paragraph :)
and thanks for agreeing, please watch out for the lynch mob that is now after you and I lol, I hear the cave under the waterfall is a place they wont look for us, we can camp out there for a while until that pitch fork mob clears out
See, now I know where you're hiding.post #20 of 6319/25/11 at 9:38am
I know, but I was hoping for a more comprehensive list.
I know that feeling of finding something lacking in almost everything. My one and only nirvana moment remains hearing the R-10s on a $13K rig or what I like to call "stupid money."
Edited by sphinxvc - 9/25/11 at 9:45ampost #21 of 6319/25/11 at 9:40am
I'm pretty frustrated with it too, I don't think a set of headphones exists except for maybe the O2 and a few other very expensive phones which I don't find hugely flawed beyond what 100 dollar speakers are capable of. I don't even bother with my nice amp and source most of the time because it doesn't matter when the headphones have such glaring problems.post #22 of 6319/25/11 at 9:43ampost #23 of 6319/25/11 at 9:51amThread Starter
omg kittens, i know right ? =^-_-^=
anywho, I'll wait until the tech for audio catches up with the current star date, as it looks right now the tech is just getting bigger and bigger, more uncomfortable and less practical. Feels totally opposite from what it should be right now and I am really tired of making compromises for the sake of my audiophile status. If its too big and at all uncomfortable, I won't use it no matter how good it sounds. No excuses from here on when it comes to my audio gear :)
I refuse to conform to the designs of today, they should be conforming to me so they will no longer have my business or my support.post #24 of 6319/25/11 at 9:53am
I really like the LCD-2 and don't have any issue with its weight or comfort, but strangely I empathise with the OP. Diminishing returns is such a pitfall around these parts, and it's incredibly easy to be drawn in by glowing praise imparted without caveat.
I've stated elsewhere that the LCD-2 (rev.2) is superior technically to my previous go to, the HD650, but in no way has it made that headphone redundant for me. If anything, it's made me appreciate the Senns more. Music presented through it isn't in the same ultra high resolution, but ultimately I find it more engaging.post #25 of 6319/25/11 at 9:55ampost #26 of 6319/25/11 at 10:00am
I agree with all the review. Of course, I only had the rev.1. I'm sure the rev.2 is waaay better, oh yeah.
300 bucks seems like a real sweet spot in headphone land. I will try the PS500 soon and we'll see. As we all know, higher prices do not exactly line up with increased quality/performance. Will $600 sound twice as good as $300? I wish.
And, yes, I've had the $30,000 speaker/amp/source system. If you're into that sort of thing, it can be fun but expensive and tiring.
Headphone amps "can" make a difference but that's waay overrated.
I try to remember, it's the music, stupid.post #27 of 6319/25/11 at 10:06am
Not quite. My LCD-2 isn't going anywhere. I'm not going to attack the OP though, as this thread could easily have been made by me. It's a fine line.
Yep, that's what the HD650 reminds me of.
Edited by olor1n - 9/25/11 at 10:08ampost #28 of 6319/25/11 at 10:07amThread Starter
The rev2 was not that much of an improvement, certainly not enough to merit me keeping them. Audible sonic change, a minor one at best but still wasn't enough to make me want to sell off my Rev1 just for a rev2. I didn't own the rev2 but I do have a friend who had it and let me tinker with it multiple times. I preferred the Rev1, I liked the sound a bit more.
The day I hear an 800$ difference from X brand/set over my $120 used HD 598 is the day I will actually want to keep it. To date, nothing has done so. Nothing beyond $300 or so had a justified ratio of price to quality...not one hi fi set.
I mean dont get me wrong, if you want a specific sound and are willing to pay for it, thats great. But for pure audio quality the price tags make it not worth it. No price on happiness though, I spent $1500 on the Edition 8s and came really close to happiness...just couldnt justify the price for that level of sound quality
Edited by swbf2cheater - 9/25/11 at 10:18ampost #29 of 6319/25/11 at 11:20amWelcome to Head-Fi where dang near everything is exaggerated. While, I don't agree with a lot of what you say about the LCD-2, I wont argue with you. Headphones are a very personal thing, and what works for one person does not mean it will work for everybody. Comfort, HRTFs, and general preference in sonic signature ensure that we will always prefer different things. Even speakers aren't immune to individual preference. The only thing that matters in this hobby is finding what you like, regardless of the cost and what the masses think, and roll with it.
A lot of people here like to make mountains out of mole hills. Subtle differences are exaggerated to the point where if you can't read between the lines, you'd think that the result was two sounds that were nothing alike. The reality is that for all the hyperbole, Joe Shmoe on the street wouldn't be able to discern the difference half the time. Heck, for quite a few of the differences described here, I'd be *very* surprised if the person describing it could even discern the difference in any blind testing. In others still, I'm practically certain the changes they "hear" are figments of their imagination.
Basically, take comments by people with a grain of salt. Try to discern the realistic differences between gear by averaging people's comments and discarding the flamboyant praise and searing hatred. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If a person calls something the worst thing ever, chances are it isn't. If something is supposed to radically change with X hours of burn in, or by using Y amp, or Z source, then you're looking at a minor change at best. If they start talking about cables and power cords, then it's probably best to increase that grain of salt to a nice heaping pound.
Finally, price and quality are never in a 1:1 ratio to one another. That's why we have the whole concept of diminishing returns. Twice the price != twice as good. It simply has never has been the case, and never will be. For some the difference is worth it. For others it wont be. The only person to be the judge of that is the individual listener.
PS: If the future is earbuds, count me out. I hate having things in my ears for extended periods of time. I'll take the big old heavy LCD-2 any day of the week for extended listening.post #30 of 6319/25/11 at 11:27am
Pick up a pair of Dayton BR-1 bookshelf speakers (a $160 kit from Parts-Express), a used or cheap 2.1 receiver (I know Sherwood has some right under $100 that apparently sound great), and $100-150 on an 8" or 10" subwoofer. If you don't want to drop $50 on revising the crossovers for the speakers (schematics from MurphyBlaster), just EQ them to make up for their slight deficiencies in the midrange. Set the subwoofer's volume to what you like.
For $350-450, you can get a 2.1 setup going that, IMO, will give similarly priced headphones some solid competition. I prefer speakers as is. Either way, if a bunch of Head-Fi folk can afford expensive headphones, they can definitely afford a speaker system.
This thread is locked
- ** Confessions of a Failing Audiophile ** - I hated the LCD2
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (Desktop Amps & DACs) 2
- › Three Word Story 46 seconds ago
- › The ultimate DAP! 512GB storage, 10,000mAh battery, features of... 1 minute ago
- › Sennheiser HD 700 Impressions Thread 1 minute ago
- › The Official Beyerdynamic T1 Impressions and Discussion Thread 1 minute ago
- › Band Name Game II 2 minutes ago
- › HiFiMAN HM-901 visit pg 18. IMGS pg 19. NEW beta FW 1st page. . New... 2 minutes ago
- › ZMF Omni - Upcoming Semi Open Flagship 3 minutes ago
- › JH Audio Layla Impressions Thread 4 minutes ago
- › Schiit Gungnir DAC 4 minutes ago
- › Krell KSA 5 Clone (China) 6 minutes ago
- › ZMF Headphones Omni by Jjacq
- › Sennheiser - Sennheiser CX 200 Street II by Gonomon
- › UMI Voix Blu by Rashmosh
- › Q Cables by Mediahound
- › Sennheiser MOMENTUM On-Ear Headphone by goodyfresh
- › AudioQuest - Nighthawk Headphones by Hisoundfi
- › Apogee GROOVE Portable USB DAC and Headphone Amplifier for Mac and PC by acain
- › Noble Audio Savant by Brooko
- › Bose® Computer MusicMonitor® -- Silver by labrat
- › Harman Kardon AE1 In Ear Headphones by Army-Firedawg
- › All about iPod Touch 6G as digital transport
- › List of major HiFiMan HE1000 reviews,...
- › Can I change my user name? Can I delete my...
- › Table of Earphocalypse
- › The Great FiiO DAP FAQ Wiki
- › Audio Connections between components --...
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Introduction)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3