When converting FLAC or WAV what should you convert the files in to?
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
I auditioned the SRH-1840 straight out of the box, and was unsatisfied with the sound, so I decided to give them a period of break-in. Recent scientific studies have shown definite differences...
-
I didn't think of TEAC when I began searching for a dedicated CD player. My initial short list included Denon, Cambridge, Marantz, Onkyo. The Teac intrigued me, so I went for it. It is very...
-
short terms: compact, loud, nice sounding, cheap ultraportables. detailed terms: AKG in the house ( fun, smooth, bassy, bright-warm & clear presentation ) cool for mainstream song...
-
Sennheiser HD-598s are the most comfortable headphones I've had the opportunity to use. I recommend these wholeheartedly for any first-time hi-fi buyer because of their excellent soundstage and...
-
I just received my SigPros (bought from a fellow head-fi'er), and now have several hours with them. They are great headphones. Agree with most of what everyone's saying about them. These...
Head-Fi Sponsors
FLAC/WAV conversion question
- Head Injury
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 4,953 Posts. Joined 9/2009
- Location: Ponyville
- Select All Posts By This User
Whatever you want, as long as you don't overwrite the original file.
You should convert your WAV file to FLAC unless there's a specific reason you have them in WAV. Then if you need smaller files for portables or something, re-encode the FLAC into variable bitrate MP3 with LAME, or Ogg Vorbis if your player supports it. Aim for a variable bitrate of around 200kbps average.
- jc222284
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 367 Posts. Joined 4/2011
- Location: Springfield, Virginia ツ
- Select All Posts By This User

Whatever you want, as long as you don't overwrite the original file.
You should convert your WAV file to FLAC unless there's a specific reason you have them in WAV. Then if you need smaller files for portables or something, re-encode the FLAC into variable bitrate MP3 with LAME, or Ogg Vorbis if your player supports it. Aim for a variable bitrate of around 200kbps average.
So I should convert them to 320 mp3? but don't do anything to the original FLAC or WAV File? is that correct
- Head Injury
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 4,953 Posts. Joined 9/2009
- Location: Ponyville
- Select All Posts By This User
There's no point in using 320kbps MP3 if you can use variable bitrate. What program are you using to convert these files?
Don't do anything to your lossless files if you don't need the space. Only convert to a lossy format if you're using a portable player or need space on your hard drive. If you're using a portable but don't need hard drive space, keep your lossless files and put the lossy files you make with them into your portable player. If you need hard drive space, just replace them with variable bitrate lossy because you probably won't notice the difference.
- jc222284
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 367 Posts. Joined 4/2011
- Location: Springfield, Virginia ツ
- Select All Posts By This User

There's no point in using 320kbps MP3 if you can use variable bitrate. What program are you using to convert these files?
Don't do anything to your lossless files if you don't need the space. Only convert to a lossy format if you're using a portable player or need space on your hard drive. If you're using a portable but don't need hard drive space, keep your lossless files and put the lossy files you make with them into your portable player. If you need hard drive space, just replace them with variable bitrate lossy because you probably won't notice the difference.
What program should I use LAME?
If you want to save space and don't mind lower quality, convert them into 320kbps mp3.
If you have space to spare and want the highest quality possible, go for FLAC.
Personally I feel that .wav are a waste of space, since I don't hear any difference between wav and flac.
- FLAC/WAV conversion question
Recent Discussions
- › Grado Fan Club! 7 seconds ago
- › Denon Officially Announces Its New Headphones! 7 seconds ago
- › Just listened to some Fostex T50RPs today... WOW! 34 seconds ago
- › The New ATH-CKM500..The best CKM earphone yet. 36 seconds ago
- › Ipod classic - rockbox - its happening. 39 seconds ago
- › Better amp for ATH-M50's for use with Macbook/iPhone? 40 seconds ago
- › AKG Q701 Quincy Jones Edition is killed? 1 minute ago
- › Chaintech AV-710 Setup Thread, Including True 44.1kHz Wolfson... 1 minute ago
- › Sennheiser HD 700: Officially Unveiled at CES 2012! 1 minute ago
- › beats and bose 1 minute ago
Recent Reviews
- › Shure SRH1840 Professional Open Back Headphones (Black) by kstuart
- › TEAC PD-H600 Reference 600 Series CD Player by gonkulator
- › AKG K403 by eskimoo
- › Sennheiser HD-598 by TK277
- › Ultrasone Signature Pro Headphones by baglunch
- › JVC HA-S600 by pootispow
- › Audez'e LCD-2 Planar Magnetic Headphones by Squuiid
- › Superlux HD-668 B by BlackTea
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





