Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Sound Science › .WAV vs. FLAC
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

.WAV vs. FLAC - Page 3

post #31 of 38
8/17/11 at 4:28pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by uelover View Post

Just use AIFF. Uncompressed lossless with support for artworks and ID tags =)


Who should use AIFF? And why?

 

Freeze should if his F1 supports it but not compressed lossless. No one else should.

Reply
post #32 of 38
8/17/11 at 4:50pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Head Injury View Post


Who should use AIFF? And why?

 

Freeze should if his F1 supports it but not compressed lossless. No one else should.



Lol should is a very strong word.

 

I for one rips everything to AIFF.

Reply
post #33 of 38
8/17/11 at 5:00pm

Given your avatar pic, I'm not surprised.

Reply
post #34 of 38
8/17/11 at 5:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by uelover View Post

Lol should is a very strong word.

 

I for one rips everything to AIFF.


Why though?

Reply
post #35 of 38
8/17/11 at 6:45pm

Freeze, burning a DVD as a data disc is bad in the first place, which is what I said. 

 

Also, man that sucks to have that much Wav. Must be fun finding things.

Reply
post #36 of 38
8/17/11 at 11:07pm

dont think my head unit in my car reads aiff never tried

 

how is burning wavs as data bad, sounds perfect to me. If a 2000 dollar player cant read data off a disc right thatd be sad

 

and its easy file path goes <artist>/<album>/files named (track #)-(artist)-(track title).wav

 

mediamonkey sort files by filepath

 

boom everything in order and alphabetical  not hard tro find stuff

 

didnt know it took a genius to figure out how to sort things without tags


Edited by Freeze - 8/17/11 at 11:12pm
Reply
post #37 of 38
8/18/11 at 7:56am
Thread Starter 

Wait.....music files are not data???????


Edited by TheAwesomesauceShow - 8/18/11 at 10:22am
Reply
post #38 of 38
8/18/11 at 8:27am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeze View Post

dont think my head unit in my car reads aiff never tried

 

how is burning wavs as data bad, sounds perfect to me. If a 2000 dollar player cant read data off a disc right thatd be sad

 

and its easy file path goes <artist>/<album>/files named (track #)-(artist)-(track title).wav

 

mediamonkey sort files by filepath

 

boom everything in order and alphabetical  not hard tro find stuff

 

didnt know it took a genius to figure out how to sort things without tags


I have foobar set up to automatically re-allocate and rename everything like this

 

<artist>/<year> <album>/<track number> <track name>

 

year of the album and track number makes the whole difference if you decide to organize it alphabetically.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Sound Science
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Sound Science › .WAV vs. FLAC