Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Looking for a $200 or so record player
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Looking for a $200 or so record player - Page 4

post #46 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eee Pee View Post





Have you seen the new Rega RP3?  Toneaudio.com has a quick review of it and the P3-24 side by side, and while they said the new RP3 is the new benchmark, that doesn't mean the P3-24 is bad.  And most places are letting their inventory of the P3-24 go for a couple hundred dollars off the price now.  Musicdirect for instance...

 

http://www.tonepublications.com/review/first-us-review-the-rega-rp3/

 

Just sharing...


Interesting, but the price isn't far off a 1200, and I was reading some owner reviews from audiophiles that say the direct drive quarts control motor is far more accurate than belt drive.  From a mechanical point of view direct drive should have less driveline powerloss and no lateral loading on bearings.  But belt drives lateral loading should dampen more vibrations (no scratch that, any bearing imperfections will be exacerbated by lateral loading).  Any thoughs?  better still do you have direct experience with both these units?

 


Edited by SP Wild - 8/27/11 at 8:26pm
post #47 of 58

Thoughts?  Yes, I suppose.  I had a Garrard back in 1996, direct drive.  It was cool, for nostalgic reasons, but I was just into college and didn't treat it right, so it wasn't for me.  I moved onward to a Sota Moonbeam (quite similar to the Rega actually).  Then to a VPI HW-19.  I was "raised" that audiophiles like/prefer/use belts.  That sideload you speak of is so small because the belt tension is practically nill.

 

And notice how many über expensive tables use belts?  

 

Experience with those units?  No, unfortunately (regrettably).  Over the years in the back of my mind I always wanted a Rega.  I'm the epitome of keep it simple and that P3 is just that.  I went with the VPI after the Sota because that's what the local dealer carried and highly endorsed.  And being allowed to listen to my records on their VPI flagship at the time, the almighty TNT, was so sweet, so surely their lower end table shared some of those qualities?  Riiiiiight...

 

~15 years later I'm back in the market for another turntable, and coincidentally the Rega RP3 is released.  I'm buying a Rega this time.

 

 

 


Edited by Eee Pee - 8/28/11 at 8:09am
post #48 of 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eee Pee View Post

Thoughts?  Yes, I suppose.  I had a Garrard back in 1996, direct drive.  It was cool, for nostalgic reasons, but I was just into college and didn't treat it right, so it wasn't for me.  I moved onward to a Sota Moonbeam (quite similar to the Rega actually).  Then to a VPI HW-19.  I was "raised" that audiophiles like/prefer/use belts.  That sideload you speak of is so small because the belt tension is practically nill.

 

And notice how many über expensive tables use belts?  

 

Experience with those units?  No, unfortunately (regrettably).  Over the years in the back of my mind I always wanted a Rega.  I'm the epitome of keep it simple and that P3 is just that.  I went with the VPI after the Sota because that's what the local dealer carried and highly endorsed.  And being allowed to listen to my records on their VPI flagship at the time, the almighty TNT, was so sweet, so surely their lower end table shared some of those qualities?  Riiiiiight...

 

~15 years later I'm back in the market for another turntable, and coincidentally the Rega RP3 is released.  I'm buying a Rega this time.

 

 

 

 

Sorry for the thread jack...but man, you got me thinking.

 

OK so I change my mind, I think belt drive when done right, for the purpose of a vibration free platter, will be better than direct drive.  The motor will always have some vibration and directly coupling this to the platter may not be the best method.  Belt drive will at least decouple the vibration of the motor from the platter, the best way would be to have the belt around the entire platter to reduce belt tension, increase grip and also increase torque for those complex passages - I saw pictures of those in the other thread of pictures of turntables.
 

 

post #49 of 58

Can you recommend some around $100 cartridges for a Technics MK2?

 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by HiGHFLYiN9 View Post

It may be difficult to find satisfaction from a $200 record player; probably the cheapest you should go is a used Technics 1200 direct drive on Craigs List (~$300) and splurge for a new cartridge (~$50-100). 



 

post #50 of 58
Thread Starter 

     Quote:

Originally Posted by heartofwinter View Post

Can you recommend some around $100 cartridges for a Technics MK2?

 


 



 



The Ortofon 2M Red was recommended to me.

post #51 of 58
Thread Starter 

I still haven't gotten my phono stage. Patiently waiting.

post #52 of 58
Thread Starter 

Should I get a platter weight? I think that's what it's called? You know the weight that you put in the middle on top of the spindle. Where can I get one?

 
post #53 of 58
rambusanna, I think you're after a record clamp. Yes, they help flatten out the record and couple it to the platter. I use one and recommend them.

J.A. Michell makes one and I also have a really nice one from Sota. Look around the Needledoctor site and eBay for them.
post #54 of 58
Thread Starter 

     Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post

rambusanna, I think you're after a record clamp. Yes, they help flatten out the record and couple it to the platter. I use one and recommend them.

J.A. Michell makes one and I also have a really nice one from Sota. Look around the Needledoctor site and eBay for them.


What is the difference between a record weight and a record clamp? I like these:

 

1.  Record Weight: http://www.ttweights.com/catalog/item/6997332/7020312.htm

 

2.  Record Clamp: http://www.ttweights.com/catalog/item/6984492/6999370.htm

 

3.  Record Clamp: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Turntable-Stabilizer-Record-Clamp-Aluminuim-Brand-NEW-/330605638524?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4cf9a1b37c#ht_2875wt_1224

 

What is a good weight? Which one of these would you guys recommend? With all that added weight, they don't slow down the platter? 

 
 
 
 
 

Edited by KB24 - 8/30/11 at 9:04am
post #55 of 58
Thread Starter 

What is the best type of mat? A rubber one or a cork one?

post #56 of 58

In those links, the clamping one uses a collet system that will grab onto the spindle of the platter.  The non clamping just rests on the record.  I suppose if the weight alone isn't heavy enough to flatten maybe a 180 gram record that's warped badly, you can push down on the weight and clamp it in place.  Seems feasible.  

 

My VPI clamp screws down so I can adjust how flat I make the record.  VPI said don't smash it, and get it right at the point before the edges of the record come up off the platter.

 

Not all platters or mats are shaped correctly to use a clamping system.  I have no clue if a Technics would benefit from one or not.  

 

In regards to the mats, you know how it goes, they all sound different.  

post #57 of 58
Thread Starter 

What is the overhang gauge for? Apparently it comes with a new Technics 1200 MK2. I didn't get one with mine because it was used.

post #58 of 58
Thread Starter 

      Quote:

Originally Posted by rambusanna View Post

What is the overhang gauge for? Apparently it comes with a new Technics 1200 MK2. I didn't get one with mine because it was used.



Nvm....I read up on the overhang tool. Apparently, it's not very accurate at all. I found a better instrument to line up the cartridge properly. It can be found here:http://www.vinylengine.com/cartridge-alignment-protractors.shtml

 

This one is supposed to be super accurate and BEST thing of all, it's FREE!! Finally something is free in this turntable business. This came at a good time because I'm broke! lol.

 
 
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Looking for a $200 or so record player