Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Rolling Stones greatest 100 albums of the 2000s.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Rolling Stones greatest 100 albums of the 2000s.

Poll Results: is it a good or bad list?

 
  • 50% (1)
    it is good considering what they had to work with. (good)
  • 50% (1)
    i would rather die then listen to most of those albums. (bad)
2 Total Votes  
post #1 of 9
7/19/11 at 2:56pm
Thread Starter 

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/100-best-albums-of-the-2000s-20110718/leonard-cohen-ten-new-songs-19691231

 

 

i just found this and i will honestly say this list is an atrocious embarrassment to music. there is much better then this that has come out since the year 2000. this list is very biased and should be renamed best MAINSTREAM albums of the 2000s. even then it's quite embarrassing.

 

 

your thoughts and opinions?

Reply
post #2 of 9
7/19/11 at 3:58pm

What albums do you think they neglected? What makes their list so terrible?

 

Reply
post #3 of 9
7/19/11 at 4:32pm

x2...seems like a fairly balanced list.  From the way you described it, I expected to see a list loaded with Beyonce and Brittney.

Reply
post #4 of 9
7/19/11 at 4:39pm
Thread Starter 

they had to many different albums from the same artist and i also found that a lot of things that should have been there weren't. everything in that list is quite mainstream and it feels they took no effort in including artists outside of the united states or britain. there is more then just 2 countries for music.

 

 

and seriously having green day on that list is a joke right?

 

same goes for autotune kanye west.

 

to many radiohead albums. 1 album per artist is enough.

 

 

they should have had lateralus by tool on that list. or blackwater park by opeth.

 

it's labeled BEST albums of the 2000s so i feel it should have the BEST of any genre and any country.


Edited by bcasey25raptor - 7/19/11 at 4:44pm
Reply
post #5 of 9
7/19/11 at 5:07pm

These lists are never going to be able to please everyone, but if you can only think of two albums that were left off I'd say they did a pretty good job. 

 

Many of my favorites from the past decade are not on this list either, but I don't need Rolling Stone or it's readers to agree with my tastes. 

 

The only real problem I have with the list is there are 3 U2 albums on it when in reality there should be 0 (lol). U2 in the 2000's doesn't actually exist to me. It's like The Simpsons after season 10. Let's just forget the rest of it has happened. 

Reply
post #6 of 9
7/19/11 at 5:10pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borat View Post

These lists are never going to be able to please everyone, but if you can only think of two albums that were left off I'd say they did a pretty good job. 

 

Many of my favorites from the past decade are not on this list either, but I don't need Rolling Stone or it's readers to agree with my tastes. 

 

The only real problem I have with the list is there are 3 U2 albums on it when in reality there should be 0 (lol). U2 in the 2000's doesn't actually exist to me. It's like The Simpsons after season 10. Let's just forget the rest of it has happened. 

oh i can think of much more but those are just 2 honorable mentions that have no excuses to not be on that list.
 

 

Reply
post #7 of 9
7/19/11 at 7:51pm

Rolling Stones is still in print? I had no idea.

Reply
post #8 of 9
7/19/11 at 7:58pm

I like this website for finding music.

Reply
post #9 of 9
7/19/11 at 8:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTizMLG View Post

I like this website for finding music.



This is another great one for finding music:

 

http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Rolling Stones greatest 100 albums of the 2000s.