Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Why does Toslink suck?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why does Toslink suck?

post #1 of 29
Thread Starter 

WP_000060.jpg

So I'm pretty much a newbie when it comes to audio play back and I was wondering if any one could answer a question for me.    For the past year I have had my Maverick Audio DAC  http://www.mav-audio.com/  hocked up to my PC via TOSlink and I just changed it to USB, (I broke my TOSlink cable when I was taking my PC to a LAN party)  Sounds better in every way!!!  

 

My question to you guys is why? Untill today if some one told me something upstream of the DAC (beyond resolution of the digital media) could effect the sound quality I would of said there full of it because my current understanding says that a digital bit is a bit and as long as none are lost it shouldn't matter if it comes from a CD player, a PC over TOSlink, USB HDMI etc......  The difference is HUGE, I bought a new TOSlink cable just to test it out and I can tell the difference between the two cables blind folded.  Dose any one know why something like this is possible? 

 

Also on a related note I am currently saving up for some HD 800s do you guys think my current DAC is good enough or should I upgrade it as well?  I can't listen to anything because I live in Columbia SC and there is no Hi-Fi shops any where near me so I will pretty much buy off of what I read on Head-Fi. I am currently in collage so money is an issue (its taken me almost 11 months to save for the HD 800s)  so if you guys think I need a better DAC to drive the HD 800s my budget is maybe $300.

 

 

 


Edited by Super MANSKITO - 7/7/11 at 9:10pm
post #2 of 29

There is this thing called jitter, you can do search to find out more about it. Basically, TOSLINK has a high amount of jitter associated while USB, especially asynchronous USB has very little jitter. Less jitter = better sound.

post #3 of 29
I doubt it is jitter. Jitter was discovered and solved back in the 1980s. It's more likely that the DAC inconsistently amplifies one signal more than the other.

As for the HD-800, you need to address the amplification well before considering the source. If you browse the HD-800 threads, you'll notice that it is quite sensitive to what it's plugged into. The HD-800 is sensitive enough to convey the problems in a poor amp.
post #4 of 29
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABXG View Post

There is this thing called jitter, you can do search to find out more about it. Basically, TOSLINK has a high amount of jitter associated while USB, especially asynchronous USB has very little jitter. Less jitter = better sound.



Interesting, just read the Wikipeadia for jitter, along with a few other results from google.   Thanks for the info smile.gif love learning.

post #5 of 29

It is possible that your soundcard or your DAC has a poor Toslink implementation. For a good Toslink connection, you must first start with a good electrical SPDIF signal. Then you need a decent optical transmitter module, and clean power to operate it. Same goes for the receiving end.

 

A quality control lapse at any one of those points might degrade the signal by introducing errors. Typical SPDIF and USB audio does not have error correction. The audio will still "work" even if not all the bits are correct. (Try editing a .wav file and changing some bits randomly. It will still play.) I wouldn't jump to conclusions about jitter just yet though. There is good evidence that jitter is barely audible except in the worst of cases. I wouldn't be surprised if a poor Toslink implementation created errors that are much more audibly obvious than jitter.

 

Of course, the same goes for USB. I know of other DACs where the USB input isn't as good as the SPDIF ones.

 

 

Just my 2 cents. None of my own DACs had poor Toslink performance out of my iMac. Never tried the Maverick Audio DAC.

 

post #6 of 29
Thread Starter 

hmmm..... cant really think of any way to test to see if i have faulty gear..... beyond buying more gear lol.  But you might be right.

post #7 of 29

mmmm, dont know. There is no real scientific evidence that it is worse, just loads of folk saying it sounds worse. Maybe they are right....maybe not.

I tried coax and toslink on my AV amp and couldnt tell the difference.

One thing that is for sure is that toslink doesnt suffer from ground loops or interference.

post #8 of 29

It sound slightly worse on my system too, compared to coax.

Strange, theoretically it should be better, because toslink does not transmit RFI and other kinds of noise, and  coax does, (USB even more apparently).

One explanation I heart is that the process of changing the electric signal into optical and back introduces some jitter. 


Edited by dura - 7/8/11 at 1:45am
post #9 of 29

When you use the toslink, the computer is the DAC and the Maverick is the amp.

When you use the USB, the Maverick is the DAC and the amp.

post #10 of 29

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by batphink View Post

When you use the toslink, the computer is the DAC and the Maverick is the amp.

When you use the USB, the Maverick is the DAC and the amp.


 

Toslink is a digital connection. The Maverick will still need to perform digital to analog conversion. So it is also the DAC and the amp in that case.

 

Perhaps you meant that with USB, the Maverick also acts as the transport, in addition to DAC/amp. Whereas with Toslink, it only acts as DAC/amp, and the computer is the transport (it generates the SPDIF signal).

 

post #11 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by batphink View Post

When you use the toslink, the computer is the DAC and the Maverick is the amp.

When you use the USB, the Maverick is the DAC and the amp.



I don't think so, when you choose to pass through the digital data, toslink is just the transporter cable, the Maverick is still a DAC & amp.

post #12 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post

I doubt it is jitter. Jitter was discovered and solved back in the 1980s. It's more likely that the DAC inconsistently amplifies one signal more than the other.

As for the HD-800, you need to address the amplification well before considering the source. If you browse the HD-800 threads, you'll notice that it is quite sensitive to what it's plugged into. The HD-800 is sensitive enough to convey the problems in a poor amp.


x2 on each point.  Save your money for the amp.  That's where the HD800 magic happens.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoga Flame View Post

It is possible that your soundcard or your DAC has a poor Toslink implementation. For a good Toslink connection, you must first start with a good electrical SPDIF signal. Then you need a decent optical transmitter module, and clean power to operate it. Same goes for the receiving end.

 

A quality control lapse at any one of those points might degrade the signal by introducing errors. Typical SPDIF and USB audio does not have error correction. The audio will still "work" even if not all the bits are correct. (Try editing a .wav file and changing some bits randomly. It will still play.) I wouldn't jump to conclusions about jitter just yet though. There is good evidence that jitter is barely audible except in the worst of cases. I wouldn't be surprised if a poor Toslink implementation created errors that are much more audibly obvious than jitter.

 

Of course, the same goes for USB. I know of other DACs where the USB input isn't as good as the SPDIF ones.

 

Just my 2 cents. None of my own DACs had poor Toslink performance out of my iMac. Never tried the Maverick Audio DAC.


Agreed.  I keep hearing about optical jitter being an issue but going from my XFi Elite Pro to UHA6S has been superb.  It's on par or better than some of the best USB implementations I've heard.  Of course that's a short cable from a breakout box attached to the soundcard so I'm not sure how much that helps.  I haven't noticed any jitter or sparkles yet.  Just rich, clear, wonderful sound.  

 

post #13 of 29
Personally, testing with my ears, coax was consistently better than optical, I really couldn't tell why on a technical basis.
I've just ordered an M2tech hiface bnc to check out USB as my dac doesn't have USB in. I'll be reporting on that!
post #14 of 29

Coax wasn't part of the OP's question or so I thought.  But yes Coax seems to rather unanimous as long as your grounds are fine. 

post #15 of 29
Sorry, you're right, I just posted sort of thinking aloud...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Why does Toslink suck?