Metrum Acoustics Octave - Page 22

Quote:

Originally Posted by WuDofu 

The connection itself is pretty fragile as even rotating the AP2 or wiggling it would cause the audio to go out.

If it is a gold coloured connector have Phil send you out the silver one.  I had the same problem originally.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WuDofu 

I had a MF 192 and recently upgraded to an AP2. It was difficult finding a base under the AP2 as I found that leaving it hanging would sometimes cause skips in the audio. The connection itself is pretty fragile as even rotating the AP2 or wiggling it would cause the audio to go out.
But once I did find a suitable base the sound is definitely better than the MF. Imaging is a lot better and some of the harshness I experienced in the MF was also gone.
Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to try the Stello U3

Sorry if we're drifting off topic but did you use another power supply with either of these?

I paid $200 for the MF 192 + $200 for an iFi iUSB power module. The combination is quite decent for 400 bucks. I might be tempted to get an AP2 and use it with the iUSB but I'm not sure if  the difference would be worth the extra $379

I use the Stello U3 for my Octave, but I'm thinking of upgrading my DDC to this:

http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/sotm/1.html

I will have the opportunity to audition these next week when I visit SOtM's headquarters in Korea, which happens to be in my hometown. With the in-built clock option as well as external power supply, the price rivals that of AP1 with PurePower.

Quote:

Originally Posted by zenpunk 

Quote:

Originally Posted by Currawong 

 

How are you connecting it?

I had the  MDAC fed through usb then using its SPDIF out (which is said to be dejittered ) to feed the Metrum. Both plugged into the Topping and level matched using MDAC volume pot (-1db) . The Topping  has an electronic relay as source selector so switching DACs is gapless. Didn't matter how hard I tried I couldn't detect the slightest differences. My friend didn't even realised I had switched sources multiple times when he tried.

Interesting.  Can you hear any difference when using 44.1k music versus up-sampling (eg: in software) with the Octave? I could on my system, though it was fairly slight. One thing I find helpful is, rather than trying to listen for differences in snippets (which admittedly is good for detecting differences in detail levels) is to just listen normally to my current favourite playlist with one DAC for a few days, then switch at some point to another.  I tend, then, to feel something is better or worse. Often it's very slight, such a particular instrument on a particular track sounding more right, wrong or whatever.

However, I reckon if, say, the M-DAC uses a slow roll-off filter like the Octave and has similar levels of resolution, it would very hard to tell them apart.

Has anyone here tried the metrum quad?

Sorry if this question has been asked before, I couldn't find anything via the thread search...

Quote:

Originally Posted by customcoco 

Has anyone here tried the metrum quad?

 

Sorry if this question has been asked before, I couldn't find anything via the thread search...

I own it and its being used along with the stello U3.

Excellent, to say the least. I ended up preferring it over the Reference 5.32 which was too dark for my tastes and less dynamic.

In a technical standpoint, they are on par ;). The quad is more lively, the Reference 5 is more, well... reference sounding :D

Hey, 

Thanks for the reply,

Have you ever compared the quad to the octave?

For placement purposes, could someone please tell me how long the cord is between the Octave and it's Power Unit?

Thanks,

Mick.
 

Long enough to place them stacked or side by side.  Cable must be 6" long.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Solude 

Long enough to place them stacked or side by side.  Cable must be 6" long.

Thank you.

Took delivery of the Octave 2 days ago so I am way early in the game. Out of the gate though I am already enjoying the sound....for lack of a better word there seems to be a different "texture" to the sound....looking forward to its evolving with time......

I have the impression that it take a lot more burn in than people say. Only a month non stop is not enough in my opinion.

Quote:

Originally Posted by customcoco 

Have you ever compared the quad to the octave?

I compared the Octave to the Hex and there is an improvement in all parameters. I can guess that the same happens going from the Quad to the Octave.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Telstar 

I compared the Octave to the Hex and there is an improvement in all parameters. I can guess that the same happens going from the Quad to the Octave.

The differences are very minor going from the Quad to the Octave. It is  a different story going from the Octave to the Hex. Totally different beast and then you add  balanced and  USB implementation and how can you compare the two.