post #91 of 117
7/1/11 at 10:00pm
Right, so if that paper's authors are correct, there is a real and tangible benefit to 24/92 music (or 32bit floating for that matter). Because at 16/44.1, you are losing tons of data that the brain uses to decode the music. At 24/96, the aliasing and artifacts are pushed out past 48Khz, so you get more of the music the way it was meant to be heard. Of course, that's still not possible for acoustic guitars, whose sound waves are much more complex than 24/96, the rest ofthe music should be improved.
















There have been new studies that suggest the high lever frequencies, while inaudible, are absolutely picked up by the brain, and effectively used in real-time to color the sound of the frequencies we DO hear. That's one reason some people feel like 24/92 files sound different than 16/44.1. Theoretically, the 44.1 cut in half is 22.05 Khz, so everything rolled off is of no value to what we hear, making anything higher rez a waste of HDD space. I just read a paper recently that could change that thinking.