i have shure se425,s im not complainng mind you, just curious if sound changes with burn in with iems or is the sound out of the box the sound they have? thanks
Related Forum Threads
- The IEM/Portable Headphones Deal Alerts Thread - Closed! Use the Deals Thread III instead. Last post on 11/13/13 at 11:26pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Any classical musicians or regular classical concertgoers here using IEMs? Last post on 12/4/12 at 11:50pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Neutral IEM for Classical and Jazz with good soundstage and bass extension Last post on 11/2/12 at 2:42am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- new in-ear Last post on 10/16/12 at 5:51pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Choosing between ATH M50 vs Philips Fidelio L1 Last post on 10/4/12 at 2:26am in Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 3
Last edited: 11/25/15
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And InformationLast edited: 6/22/16
- Basic Guide To In Ear CanalphonesLast edited: 3/22/12
Advanced AcousticWerkes Q: Deceptively Small The AAW Q is an upcoming IEM from Singaporean company Advanced AcousticWerkes, scheduled for release in the first week of September. It boasts a new...
Now that I've heard all the ADEL modules from Asius technologies(what has been released since 8/16), it's even harder to pick a favorite. Some days I want to tune the sound to my unique anatomy,...
I dont want to waste my time writing an essay for something that lasted only 1 or 2 months. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBnJ9zrnhGU My Rant and broken Shures in link above The bass...
(PS: Some content here may be a no-brainer for most but is just there for the less-informed). Please also ignore any errors, judgements. I'm a medio-phile and not an audiophile so, judge...
do iem,s burn in?post #1 of 986/18/11 at 7:11pmThread Starter
Gear mentioned in this thread:post #2 of 986/18/11 at 7:16pm
This is a delicate topic. Some will tell you it's your ears adjusting to the new sound or the adjustment to the correct seal. While others will tell you the story about burn-in.
I do believe in burn in (tested it first hand with 2 pairs of headphones). So they should change within their first 100-200 hours of use.post #3 of 986/21/11 at 12:18ampost #4 of 986/21/11 at 4:55am
To answer your question correctly:
No, the sound doesn't change. Burn-in is a myth among the hifi-community.
Ever heard of a headphone that sounded "worse" after burn-in? Exactly!
It's just another thing that keeps an audiophile busy and restless as there is always something to improve. Everything revolves rather around the gear than the music. In fact it's pretty much only about the gear which needs to be swapped frequently as well.
It is an audiophiles dream that even a well engineered headphone can be improved just by letting it play. Even better with certain frequencies or white, pink or whatever noise, preferably from special burn-in CDs.
Save yourself some time and money and just ignore false claims such as burn-in.post #5 of 986/21/11 at 5:04ampost #6 of 986/21/11 at 6:07am
I actually own the SE425's. Mine are about 3 months old - so have at least 150 hours on them. I've noticed no change - for better or worse. They still sound great.post #7 of 986/21/11 at 7:28ampost #8 of 986/21/11 at 7:41am
LOL. I find some speakers that I like, almost unlistenable when new. I have compared new to well run. They're easy to hear blind and eventually become the same with play. Those that don't hear differences are often enveloped in a self fulfilling prophesy where they buy unrevealing kit based on specs and bias and end up with something that can't show the differences they are sure aren't there. Some things do break in more than others with many BAs being quite subtle to neglegable but others noticable so take with a grain and don't worry about it. Just don't return something you buy until you give it a fair shake.
Edited by goodvibes - 6/21/11 at 7:43ampost #9 of 986/21/11 at 7:42ampost #10 of 986/21/11 at 7:53am
Draw your own conclusion, but I like this quote:Quote:It should be mentioned that, while proponents of break-in bear the burden of proof for their claims, opponents are equally without proof for their theories and counter-claims. And simply saying "we need more evidence" can be used by some to stonewall. It's not a compelling intellectual position.post #11 of 986/21/11 at 8:41am
I can see dynamic based speakers changing just due to their design and the materials used, It's very simple physics, Take Glass, Glass looks the same all the time, But it's changing all the time Glass never Sets, Because it stays a liquid, Just because we don't see or hear it doesn't mean it's not there, Dave Rat did a Burn in Test on many pairs of headphones, His conclusion was Burning in Helps but the slight improvement he observed from the Burn in logically was not worth the Effort to let them play for the 5 days.
His Video can be found here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yeAquRyJiw
Unsure about BA drivers i would have thought after afew hours of use the moving parts would loosen up, Just Dynamic speakers use alot of cloth type fibre Rings over the voice coil which stretch and move to make the sound and then the clone which is made normally from cardboard or plastic, Or resin covered woven material, Which would Co inside with what Dave Rat see's that the Volume goes up slightly by itself as the speaker loosens up and the Lows, Meds, Highs line up alittle more which is what you call Burn in, Do they change?, Yes. Can you tell?, Most likely No.
Nat.post #12 of 986/21/11 at 10:07ampost #13 of 986/21/11 at 10:20am
It's the same stuff over and over again... Some say we hear a change, then others say it's a placebo effect, change in seals, etc. What's not to say it's a placebo effect if you don't hear a change? LOL. Think what you want of it. I believe in burn in, and have had a pair of headphones get slightly worse with burn in, then get better (Brainwavz M3).post #14 of 986/21/11 at 12:13pm
Yep, but since there is some kinda censorship going on on this board which deleted just recently my posts about burn-in, aftermarket cables etc. while other head-fiers talk about their aftermarket cables burning-in and that they sounded so much better after 250hrs of burn-in as freely as they like, I recon it's good to speak some sense (instead of continuously promoting this non.-sense). Otherwise it is just ridiculous!
In the world of professional audio equipment I've never, ever heard of people talking about burn-in or aftermarket cables!post #15 of 986/21/11 at 3:16pm
So be it. Live and let live.
And yes, I couldn't care less if somebody wants to spend $250 on an in-ear aftermarket cable.
The one who's asking the price is not the fool. ;)
What I find rather annoying is that people keep on literally promoting this stuff and I stumble over them threads over and over again.
"The stock cable doesn't show the real potential of this pair of cans. You better get the $250 whatever silver cable and let it burn-in for at least 500hrs. Benefits: better bottom end, more detailed, pulled curtain and whatnot.
Wait until you hear the $500 cable after 1000hrs! You wanna change your system because the cable is so revealing that all your gear sounds rubbish!"
Stupid engineers they don't even get that right, don't you think!?
People really buy into this. And companies are not ashamed to tell you the wildest stories. Why would they as long as people buy it.
I probably can't take it anymore.
Just image how much better a recording would sound if they would just let the cables burn in before they start the sessions. Especially the new ones. Do they need to be burned in equally? Darn!
You can't be serious. How about a cable needs to be replaced during the recordings. OMG!
You're talking about existence and value which are rather two different things in my book.
But if something doesn't exist (e.g. sound difference between $5 XLR cable and $1000 Kimber XLR cable), hence doesn't improve anything (soundwise), if your goal is to improve the sound quality, it has no value!
People talk about believes but don't understand that audio equipment is not about believes, it's about science.
As long as it is connected to believes and feelings, which is because it reproduces music, which is one of the most moving art forms, hifi people tend to project these feelings onto their gear. It's harder to relate emotionally to mathematics, right!?Return HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- do iem,s burn in?
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
- › Empire Ears - Discussion & Impressions (Formerly EarWerkz) 1 minute ago
- › Audeze SINE Series 1 minute ago
- › JVC HA-SZ2000/1000 Impressions Thread 2 minutes ago
- › New BA IEMs from Brainwavz? 5 minutes ago
- › Little Dot MK VI / Little Dot MK VIII SE Owners Unite 5 minutes ago
- › Crack;Bottlehead OTL 6 minutes ago
- › "The Lab" 7 minutes ago
- › Asus Xonar U7 DAC/AMP Impressions Thread 7 minutes ago
- › Caffeine addicts anonymous 7 minutes ago
- › Rockbox Xduoo X3 10 minutes ago
- › Advanced AcousticWerkes Q by ustinj
- › Asius Technologies ADEL™ G1 Auto Modules by Ike1985
- › AAW Nebula Two Hybrid In-Ear Monitor by tz0531
- › Shure SE215 by Nick Walters
- › E-mu Teak Headphones by AT Khan
- › Marshall Mode In-Ear Headphones, Black/White (4090939) by PopZeus
- › Pro-Ject Debut Carbon by davehg
- › Brainwavz Jive by Lurk650
- › Campfire Audio Andromeda by k4rstar
- › Bluedio U (UFO) PPS 8 Drivers Over-ear Bluetooth Wireless Headphone... by Peddler
- › Flawless Album Suggestions
- › The Audiophile Scene in a Third World Country...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide:...
- › Chord Mojo FAQ
- › Head-Fi Logo Gear
- › All about iPod Touch 6G as digital transport
- › List of major HiFiMan HE1000 reviews,...
- › Can I change my user name? Can I delete my...