Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Little Dot i+ vs Schitt Asgard vs MAD EAR+ HD (Grado compliments)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Little Dot i+ vs Schitt Asgard vs MAD EAR+ HD (Grado compliments) - Page 2

post #16 of 20
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LugBug1 View Post

 

I think SS amps bring to the forefront what Grado's are best at; detail, energy and great timing.  But as you say, they seem to deliver a more real musical presentation with tubes.

 

 Incidentaly, Ive got a few unopened boxes of tubes that have been delivered.. I think that means I must be happy with what I've got at the mo; opa2107 and EF91's. The EF91's are great with the warm full bodied 2107 as they are very open sounding with extension at both ends, seem to be a good combo!

gs1000.gif

 

   

 


Good to know since I've actually got that same opamp/tube combo in shipment right nowbiggrin.gif Hehe hope they get here soon my anticipation just went up a few notches.

 

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #17 of 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjoh View Post




Good to know since I've actually got that same opamp/tube combo in shipment right nowbiggrin.gif Hehe hope they get here soon my anticipation just went up a few notches.

 



Nice one! I'm sure you'll be pleased, perfect for the Grado's. (remember to change them Jumper settings)

 

post #18 of 20
Thread Starter 

EF91's came in today!  I must say that for those who are a fan of the grado "house sound", these tubes are a very very nice compliment it.  I find the m8100's are very lush and warm sounding tubes and are great for someone who find the grado sound just a tad bit too forward.  The EF91's, on the other hand, pour a lot more presence into the mids.  Even though they still give a tube-like sound, the warmth is taken down a few notches.  I also find that I notice more detail with these tubes and that there may even be a little improvement with the soundstage.

 

So again for anyone who likes grado's mainly for there forward mids, the EF91's compliment them reeaally nicely. By this point it's getting very difficult to imagine these headphones sounding any better. I can't wait to see what the OPA2107 brings to the tablesmile_phones.gif

 

With the LDi+ delivering so much to my RS2's, I'm growing a lot more curious about the MAD EAR+ HD and how significant it's improvements would be over the LDi+.  

post #19 of 20

I think you're going to be even more pleased when the 2107 comes! Thats a good description of the EF91's, I find them very open sounding and they bring out more detail. The 2107 brings more body and deeper soundstage that seems to work with that kind of tube, rather than an overly warm type.

 

It does make you wonder how much better you can get for Grado's, because they are never going to have a huge soundstage, and the detail and realism I'm getting with the LD especially with acoustic instruments is amazing.  

post #20 of 20

Form a technical standpoint the one thing that LD 1+ has over the MAD EAR+ HD  since the LD !+  is a hybrid is power output at low impedance levels.  I am not sure if the MAD EAR+ HD  will be able to drive will be able to drive my Fostex T50RP.  headphones

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Little Dot i+ vs Schitt Asgard vs MAD EAR+ HD (Grado compliments)