Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › argh - Peter Jackson's new cinema format likened to CD vs vinyl
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

argh - Peter Jackson's new cinema format likened to CD vs vinyl - Page 2

post #16 of 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by shigzeo View Post

^^ Anaxilus: if you are in Korea, there is only ONE way to watch it: 3D. This country is all about the ONE way, or the high way. I hope that I am out long before this movie debuts. (I'm probably being monitored right now, so if I don't sign into HF for a few days, it's been nice.)


Oh yeah.  Forgot Smasung is pushing their 3D TV crap.  Sorry to hear that.  Hope you make it ok.  Hint, don't go North.  wink_face.gif

 

post #17 of 22

The 3D implementation varies quite a lot from movie to movie. There is generally design choices more then anything else that decide how realistic depth there is in a move. A lot of movies go for maximum amount of out of screen 3D since that is what the audience expects. You can compare it to pop music with car audio bass and the likes ;). But there is also movies where it´s a lot more subtle. Tron Legacy is a really nice 3D movie. Bad movie but 3D is good. But people complain about it "not being 3D enough". Generally for animated movies I don´t mind flashy 3D. It often go along with the concept really well.

 

Also I might add that I watch my 3D movies at home using 3D vision and a XL2410T monitor. Have watched some 20s movies so far. That TN monitor is hardly reference but there is no input lag and extremely little ghosting so it´s superior to any LCD TV or Plasma  I have seen in stores for 3D. Don´t have the size of our real3D cinema in town but it has no problem going neck to neck otherwise. 120 hz so 60 hz per eye and the 3D goes more into the screen than out into your face which I preferr as well. One thing I also noticed is that upsampled DVD movies often have more natural depth then dedicated 3D movies. They suffer a bit from the lower resolution though which make them more straining. Sadly for some reason neither powerdvd or TMT5 let you run 3D for bluray movies.

 

Some will get head aches or nausea. Has been some research and it´s around 10 %. Personally I never get that but then I have trained my brain for stereo3D since before. Was running stereo3d for gaming during the CRT era before they where replaced by todays inferior but bigger LCD and Plasma monitors. The trick is to start small and as your brain learns you can increase the separation. Was running with a fresnel lens at times which magnified my 22" to something like a 60" and I could run max stereo separation after a while using that setup as well. Now we are talking immersion for racing simulations! 

 

 

post #18 of 22

I hope it will be shown in 2D as well.  

post #19 of 22
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Audio-Omega View Post

I hope it will be shown in 2D as well.  



bet it will be shown in 2D and 24 fps. there's no director or producer with enough clout to make all cinema operators upgrade their projection equipment at once. we saw the same pattern with high-resolution projectors once they became available. on the one hand there was the inevitable format war, just as with VHS and Betamax or with HDVD and BluRay, so that theaters dithered, no pun intented; and then there's the significant cost. on the other, proponents of high-res digital projectors have long argued that the cost would be offset somewhat by the studio not having to produce costly celluloid rolls of film to distribute physically. how much it would save to distribute digitally is not clear - it depends on security concerns (and we know Hollywood has them, with digital work prints leaking before official release dates, and so forth).

 

I have seen a number of 3D films and never found them better - some are gimmicky, some are hybrid and come across as ambivalent; it's a heavy-handed special FX thing for now. in the end, cinema like most other popular art forms has developed ways to get the audience to ignore or momentarily forget the tech trickery. 3D might eventually become as transparent as the many kinds of special FX that were jarring at first but are acceptable when they're deployed for narrative or audiovisual ends that justify them.


Edited by melomaniac - 4/15/11 at 8:43am
post #20 of 22

If the film is going to be made in 3D and 48fps, then I would like to watch it that way. I am a big supporter of higher frame rate anyway and looking forward to seeing it very much. 3D or not is much less important.

 

post #21 of 22

I don't think 24p is enough, especially for fast action or when the camera is panning.

 

I sort of tolerate the blur in fast action, but I think the human eye reacts faster than 24 images/s which would make a higher framerate more realistic, but what I hate is 24p panning, I see a succession of stuttering images instead of a film when the camera is moving too fast.

post #22 of 22

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/lord-of-the-rings-films-return-to-the-big-screen-with-almost-three-extra-hours-of-footage/story-e6frfku0-1226050632416

 

I wonder if the extended versions are similar to the ones that have already been released.  


Edited by Audio-Omega - 5/5/11 at 5:18am
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › argh - Peter Jackson's new cinema format likened to CD vs vinyl