New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

REVIEW: 1964-Q - Page 2

post #16 of 17

I haven't heard it in a while now (nearly 2 years I guess LoL), but my memory somehow does remind me that it wasn't so sparkly with the trebles, and I did not like it too much.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by miow View Post

Muddy or lacking? Are you sure we have listen the same UM3X? 



 



Quote:
Originally Posted by flargosa View Post


With some warm sources, the UM3x can sound a little soft on the edges, due to its inherent smooth sound signature.  I wouldn't call it muddy though.  

 



 



 

post #17 of 17

hey @TEX i would love another quick review of the 64-Q's on how they sound fully broken in a year later haha :)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav: