I put "24 bit" in quotes because no existing audio ADC has noise level that low, "flagship" monolithic audio ADC currently manage ~120 dB A weighted, or 20 bit dynamic range
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
This quick review is done after a few hours of listening. I bought them from B&H for the decent sum of 150$. If you've done your research you'll find out that Ultrasone HPs are known for their...
-
I auditioned the SRH-1840 straight out of the box, and was unsatisfied with the sound, so I decided to give them a period of break-in. Recent scientific studies have shown definite differences...
-
I didn't think of TEAC when I began searching for a dedicated CD player. My initial short list included Denon, Cambridge, Marantz, Onkyo. The Teac intrigued me, so I went for it. It is very...
-
short terms: compact, loud, nice sounding, cheap ultraportables. detailed terms: AKG in the house ( fun, smooth, bassy, bright-warm & clear presentation ) cool for mainstream song...
-
Sennheiser HD-598s are the most comfortable headphones I've had the opportunity to use. I recommend these wholeheartedly for any first-time hi-fi buyer because of their excellent soundstage and...
Head-Fi Sponsors
24-bit vs 16-bit at a common sample rate - difference? - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
I think people are in love with the idea that using 24-bits will yield better sound because it seems to address that age-old misconception that anything digital is made of of blocky, steppy waveforms, while anything analog (even cassette tapes) appears as this lovely, endlessly detailed, fluid wave shape.
There was an amazingly ill-informed story on this back on MTV sometime in the early 1990s, basically a shock discovery piece that warned us that CD waveforms were these horribly unsightly, blocky things (picture a 3-bit digital signal) which somehow "lost" information between the steps that, of course, was magically reproduced on vinyl records and cassette tapes. I'm assuming they had a "part 2" set to talk about the Nyquist theorem, but this being the grunge era I'm sure I just decided they were all sell-outs and turned off the TV.
The unlikely voice of reason on this piece was Megadeth's Dave Mustaine, who explained, in fewer words, that digital was more revealing than analog, and people who preferred the latter were probably just not ready to hear all the warts and imperfections digital was able to offer them. MTV did not give Dave the last word here.
There's an article which restates this old myth on, of all places, howstuffworks.com but I don't feel like looking it up as it will just make me angry.
- Justin Uthadude
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 643 Posts. Joined 5/2009
- Location: Between Montgomery and Auburn
- Select All Posts By This User
Would 2^24 not be an advantage over 2^16 when multiplying by odd ratios to get equalized volume (via replaygain)?
once the bits are in your computer sound system sw then using 24 bit (or even 32 since that is the "word" size in most PC) represention is reasonable for any processing like digital volume or sw EQ, cross feed and sending 24 bits to a HD soundcard or chip with a "24 bit" DAC would save spending cycles on re-dithering since analog noise in even the best audio DAC will "dither" the output
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- 24-bit vs 16-bit at a common sample rate - difference?
Recent Discussions
- › Review: Violectric HPA V200 amp 40 seconds ago
- › Anedio D2 DAC release 1 minute ago
- › Help me blow $2000! Build me a portable rig from the ground up! 2 minutes ago
- › Multi-IEM Review - 239 IEMs compared (Alclair Reference added... 3 minutes ago
- › Funny comments from the forums. 3 minutes ago
- › Buying portable or in-ear headphones? Seeking guidance? DON'T... 3 minutes ago
- › Disappointed with Creative EP-630 3 minutes ago
- › Ultimate Ears Personal Reference Monitors: The *Custom* Custom... 3 minutes ago
- › Audio Technica ATH-PRO700MK2 review - Take two... 6 minutes ago
- › The Deals Thread 7 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Ultrasone HFI-780 S-Logic Surround Sound Professional Headphones by 12Rounds
- › Shure SRH1840 Professional Open Back Headphones (Black) by kstuart
- › TEAC PD-H600 Reference 600 Series CD Player by gonkulator
- › AKG K403 by eskimoo
- › Sennheiser HD-598 by TK277
- › Ultrasone Signature Pro Headphones by baglunch
- › JVC HA-S600 by pootispow
- › Audez'e LCD-2 Planar Magnetic Headphones by Squuiid
- › Superlux HD-668 B by BlackTea
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map






