That doesn't raise any red flags for you?
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
- categoryComputer Audio
Related Forum Threads
- How can I listen to High Res above 96hz Last post on 4/3/13 at 12:12pm in Computer Audio
- Cannot install foobar Last post on 4/1/13 at 2:59pm in Computer Audio
- MQn minimalist Wasapi WAV C++ memory player integrated with foobar2000 Last post on 5/7/13 at 1:27pm in Computer Audio
- Need help removing mic hiss Last post on 3/30/13 at 9:44am in Computer Audio
- iTunes 11 columns? Last post on 1/6/13 at 1:27pm in Computer Audio
Recent Reviews
-
My opinions Sound The sound produced by the HD558 is rich, a bit light, and isn't bloated with bass which is a good thing. It has a crisp treble and punchy bass, very great...
-
Introduction In the past 2 years VentureCraft has been successfully creating amps and DAC/Amp packaged components with their GD-03, Go-DAP 4.0 for iPhone 4(s), and Go-DAP X for their...
-
A friend of mine needed a new headphone, which was cheap, closed and good sounding. I said to him, dream on friend it will be very tough to find a headphone with those criteria. But then after...
-
Along with the summary below, I have posted a Youtube video review of the K550. If you like the video, check out my channel for more reviews :) Summary BUILD The AKG K550...
-
Along with the summary below, I have posted a Youtube video review of the RE-400. If you like the video, check out my channel for more reviews :) Summary BUILD The RE-400...
Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes - Page 107
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- AppleheadMay
- Trader Feedback: +40
-
- offline
- 2,000 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
- HeadphoneAddict
- Trader Feedback: +9
-
- offline
- 16,736 Posts. Joined 8/2007
- Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah, it tells me that auditory memory is short. After listening to 2.4.0 and then taking the time to update and listening to 2.4.4 I thought it sounded slightly richer to me, but I can't go back and listen to 2.4.0 and switch back and forth with 2.4.4 to be sure. And everyone knows that. My point was neither one sounds tizzy to me, as previously described for 2.4.0. In general, I don't hear very much change in sound between versions of Amarra, and subtle changes can be tricks of the mind.
Other things raise red flags for me, are like when the PS Audio Perfectwave DAC is reported to sound different with every firmware upgrade, even when changes have nothing to do with the decoding process.

Yeah, it tells me that auditory memory is short. After listening to 2.4.0 and then taking the time to update and listening to 2.4.4 I thought it sounded slightly richer to me, but I can't go back and listen to 2.4.0 and switch back and forth with 2.4.4 to be sure.
That is one possible (and quite reasonable) explanation, but not the only one.
- HeadphoneAddict
- Trader Feedback: +9
-
- offline
- 16,736 Posts. Joined 8/2007
- Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
- Select All Posts By This User
- HeadphoneAddict
- Trader Feedback: +9
-
- offline
- 16,736 Posts. Joined 8/2007
- Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
- Select All Posts By This User
That's another possible (and quite reasonable) explanation.
- iamoneagain
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 830 Posts. Joined 10/2006
- Location: San Diego
- Select All Posts By This User
I'm really liking the sound of the latest Amarra build. Comparing it to the latest build of Audirvana + beta, it sounds richer, a little fuller, and has a little more depth. Audirvana + sounds a little dry in comparison. Now I still hate that Amarra takes up to a minute or so to load a full album, but seems to play perfect gapless. It also seems quicker when set to load only one song that it did in the past. I believe some of improvement were already in place in the last version but now really enjoying sound quality.
- omasciarotte
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 27 Posts. Joined 6/2008
- Location: Minneapolis
- Select All Posts By This User
Good point but, if it is, it's broken. At least that's the case for Amarra since their pro users are routinely looking analytically at the output, whether it's a procedure as simple as making sure the HDCD indicator is lit on playback or running the signal through Spectrafoo or some other multifaceted analytics tool. I'm sure the folks at Audiofile Engineering, Channel D, etc. all feel the same way; if the 'ware ain’t bit perfect, somethin’s broke.
BTW, I just sent a note off to AE asking them about a bit-perfect test procedure in Spectre. I'll report back if anyone cares as to the outcome...'Foo already does that BTW.
- Currawong
- Trader Feedback: +29
-
- offline
- 10,893 Posts. Joined 1/2008
- Location: An Australian living in Fukuoka, Japan.
- Select All Posts By This User
From another thread:

Hello All,
This is great discussion and we wanted to offer a few points of clarification regarding Amarra.
- Amarra does provide bit-perfect output, it's a basic premise we believe strongly in.
- Amarra does not process the sound in any way unless the user does so via adding EQ, using DIther or other manual adjustments to the sound stream. Tracks are played back at their native sample rate, no real-time up or down-samplilng occurs.
- "Amarra works with almost all Core Audio Interfaces" means that Amarra uses the same audio protocols that core audio does. This allows us to talk to devices that are recognized in Audio Midi Setup. The signal Amarra presents to those devices is just a better signal than iTunes and other players using core audio can provide.
- AppleheadMay
- Trader Feedback: +40
-
- offline
- 2,000 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
After all I read in this thread and having expirimented for over a year with (and having bought) most of the top players mentioned I come to this (admittedly very simplified) conclusion. OK, I'm taking a really short turn through the curve here but that doesn't make it any more logical and true. ;)
Since we noticed the following:
1) iTunes is bitperfect if all sound enhancments and volume control is turned off.
2) BitPerfect sounds the most like (or the same as) iTunes.
3) BitPerfect is a very lightwieght app so probably less sound fiddling (enhancements) is going on.
4) The other players seem to add their flavor to the music so they can't be bitperfect anymore.
We could conclude that BitPerfect is the ideal solution here: true bitperfect sound, auto switching of sample rates (which is the only thing iTunes lacks) and a lightweight, inobtrusive app you don't even notice. Just let it fire up on startup of your Mac and never think about it again. And it costs a few dimes.
Sounds good to me, I'm gonna stick with this one.
- agentsim
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Member of the Trade. Author of BitPerfect.
-
- offline
- 281 Posts. Joined 4/2006
- Select All Posts By This User
Glad you like it :)
- AppleheadMay
- Trader Feedback: +40
-
- offline
- 2,000 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
I sure do.
Just silly I spent so much money on 3 Amarra, 1 Audirvana and 1 Fidelia licenses.
Puremusic and 2 others I don't remember the name of I used via a trial.
IMO you should keep the app as simple as it is now and charge a bit more, seen what the competition asks. OK, there's no playlist function but that's just the beauty of it for those who like the way iTunes works, like me.
- agentsim
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Member of the Trade. Author of BitPerfect.
-
- offline
- 281 Posts. Joined 4/2006
- Select All Posts By This User

I sure do.
Just silly I spent so much money on 3 Amarra, 1 Audirvana and 1 Fidelia licenses.
Puremusic and 2 others I don't remember the name of I used via a trial.
IMO you should keep the app as simple as it is now and charge a bit more, seen what the competition asks. OK, there's no playlist function but that's just the beauty of it for those who like the way iTunes works, like me.
We'll have a version for direct purchase (no App Store) that does Integer Mode on Lion/Mountain Lion, but some internal projects are currently higher priority than that... too many ideas, not enough time :)
- AppleheadMay
- Trader Feedback: +40
-
- offline
- 2,000 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
Will keep an eye out for it, thanks.
I added your RSS and Twitter feeds so I can stay up to date.
- Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
Recent Discussions
- › The NEW JVC HA-S400. Affordable Carbon Nanotube cans for the masses. 27 seconds ago
- › Music Game IX 36 seconds ago
- › Band Name Game II 38 seconds ago
- › The Decware TABOO MK 111 Appreciation Thread 55 seconds ago
- › Schiit Lyr - The tube rolling thread 1 minute ago
- › Woo Audio Amp Owner Unite 1 minute ago
- › Sony XB series 1 minute ago
- › Is Sansa Clip + really that good?! 2 minutes ago
- › "Mad Dog" by MrSpeakers, modified Fostex T50RP review 2 minutes ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 2 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Sennheiser HD-558 by Tr1ckster
- › Go-Dap DD Socket1 (DD/DA Converter) for iPhone & iPod... by AnakChan
- › Philips SHL5905BK/28 CitiScape Uptown by Marleybob217
- › AKG K 550 by a_recording
- › HiFiMAN RE-400 by a_recording
- › Sony XBA-40/N Gold | Quad Balanced Armature In-Ear Headphones... by a_recording
- › Sony XBA-4SL by a_recording
- › Sony MDR-MA900 Over the Head Style Headphones by a_recording
- › Aune T1 by teb1013
- › Logitech Speaker System Z623 by D3Seeker
New Articles
- › Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes by miceblue
- › STAX SR-007 (Omega II) ... A Review After 4... by Currawong
- › List of lossless and high-res music (FLAC,... by ffivaz
- › Beware of the following scams and people... by Currawong
- › Sennheiser 449 Mod Possibly 4 8 Mod by hernan604
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Computer Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Portable... by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Desktop Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Headphone... by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Power Corner) by joe
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map



















