Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › 6G Nano - why did it take Apple this long ??
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

6G Nano - why did it take Apple this long ?? - Page 2

post #16 of 25
1/22/11 at 1:47pm

Is there a a teardown of the new iWatch somewhere, please? What are the chips (provided that Apple didn't sand them)?

Reply
post #17 of 25
1/22/11 at 7:00pm

iPod Nano 6th Generation Teardown - iFixit

 

I'm assuming the chip of interest is the Apple 339S0104, the Samsung APL3278A01 ARM-based SoC that's outlined in blue on some of the pics.

 

I have no clue what any of this means, so don't ask! wink.gif

 

FAKE EDIT: Have to say I'm quite surprised that the battery is just one-third the capacity of that of the Clip+'s.  ****ing iPods, how do they work?

Reply
post #18 of 25
1/22/11 at 7:18pm

FAKE EDIT

 

lol

 

real edit  I found out how to take apart my dead 2G shuffle.

Reply
post #19 of 25
1/22/11 at 7:25pm

If it came in 32gb I'd have bought 1 of these little watch AAC players the day it was released,...alas, no such luck for me. Guess I'm stuck w/an iPod: mini @32gb, video 5.5G, nano 5G, classic 7G, and an iPhone 4,... Ah, the sadness of it all,... wink_face.gif

Reply
post #20 of 25
1/22/11 at 7:31pm

...well, you could buy 16 shuffles for $800.

Reply
post #21 of 25
1/22/11 at 8:08pm

Still not ready to adequately compare the Nano to the J3, but as a relative noob I have a quick question about terminology.  Someone already mentioned the Nano is a warmish player, I suspect the Cowon is a cold player.  Is this the correct?

Reply
post #22 of 25
1/22/11 at 8:16pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by basementdweller View Post

Still not ready to adequately compare the Nano to the J3, but as a relative noob I have a quick question about terminology.  Someone already mentioned the Nano is a warmish player, I suspect the Cowon is a cold player.  Is this the correct?


Several people here have described their Cowon as 'cold' - mine was probably more 'neutral' than anything else, but its subjective. Detail levels are very good, so I guess it just comes down to whether you like the player or not - the UI on mine was crapola.

 

As for the comments re 'audiophiles will get a shock when we can bypass the DAC', I assume you mean 'bypass it in a truly portable rig', and that is already a reality. The more I think about it, bypassing the DAC and amp on the iPod/iPad makes it an 'intelligent flash drive' (or hard drive in the case of the classic) - I dont think too many over at Computer Audiophile would be shocked by the concept that flash-based music can sound phenomenal : they are happy to hook some very expensive kit up to SSD-based rigs.

Reply
post #23 of 25
1/22/11 at 8:48pm

@estreeter -  I'm with you estreeter. I put my 3G Touch 64gb toe to toe with my new Cowon D2+. I gave exact detail in another post, but suffice it to say that the Touch won out over the D2+. The Touch is a mofo DAP, and with Yuin PK-1's, sounds great. Yep, great! (I returned the D2+ to Amazon)

Reply
post #24 of 25
1/22/11 at 9:25pm

Just received a 6G nano as a gift, I must say I agree with the original post.. The 6th gen iPod is one of the best iPod's I have heard. It is different than my 5.5th gen, which I still love.  But the 6G nano is great on the detail end, very clean and analytical w out sounding too digital (but better than the awful 6th gen iPod Classic) but that could change with your headphones. I am currently using mdr-ex300 (one of my favourite IEMS that I own). It is still warm sounding in comparison to the 2G touch...Yes Apple, why did it take this long!.  Recommended purchase...Best worn on shirt sleeve.

Reply
post #25 of 25
1/23/11 at 3:07pm
Thread Starter 

As I said in my initial post, its easy to write a lot of the 'gee whiz' factor off on new toy joy syndrome, but I readily admit that it may be the opposite of the usual - in this case, my expectations werent as high as they would be with a $220 pair of headphones, for example. Always better to have low expectations exceeded than the inverse :)

 

I had intended to buy the Clip+ this week to be able to give HFiers some sort of comparison, but I can no longer see any point - this DAP is as warm as I could want and spending more money just doesnt make sense atm. 

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › 6G Nano - why did it take Apple this long ??