Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Emmeline II The Stealth - Pictures 56K Warning
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Emmeline II The Stealth - Pictures 56K Warning - Page 5

post #61 of 99
markl
Just do a search on Hirschs supra tuberolling for 6sn7 varients.
Looking at the tube compliment of the stealth and tubes I have on hand.
For the gain 12au7 I would use the amperex 7316pq great tube,I use it in my Hovland Hp100. in place of the stock Ei12au7.
For the driver sylvania vt231s used in my Cary 300sei and works well with the singlepower amps as well.
post #62 of 99

Tubes in the Stealth..

Hi Markl...
The 6SN7 Electro Harmonix are used in this design to drive the load, headphones. The input tube is the most critical in creating the sound & the gain that you want, all the low, medium & high mue tubes offer certain gain & quality of sound needed to work to your liking. The circuit is designed around 12AX7 which has the highest gain, the electrohamonix12AX7 was chosen as a stock tube, also tried the 12AX7 from JJ & it sounded great too.
We did try many NOS tubes in the amp, Buggle boy, Telefunkin, Amperex & Mullard, but there was no change in general tonal characteristics of the amp. 24 dollars for matched 6SN7s & 10 dollard for low noise 12AX7, & you will be happy, also none of these tubes is pushed beyound 1/2 of what the tube is capable of as voltage wise. If you have the money to spend on the NOS tubes, be my guest.
Cheers.
Ray Samuels
)
post #63 of 99
Ray Samuels, what is the retail price of Emmeline II?
post #64 of 99
This is one helluva nice looking amp.
post #65 of 99
Thanks, Ray. Now where's my review sample!
post #66 of 99
MarkL,

I didn't see a response, but I believe that the order of gain from highest to lowest is:

12ax7
12at7
12au7

The variants fall somewhere in-between these larger steps. The 5751 is less than the 12ax7, but IIRC, slightly more than the 12at7.



Ray,

Thanks for designing an amp that sounds great with current production tubes!! This is ever becoming a necessity due to the super-high demand and prices on the NOS tubes. More manufacturers should follw suit and design something that sounds great using current production tubes that are readily available and dirt cheap. To me, $35 for a set of three tubes is NOTHING when you look at the 5751 and 6sn7 tubes that can cost that per tube. Maybe it's time to take a serious look at Hirsch's experiments with cryo treatment of current production tubes.
post #67 of 99
Thanks for the info, Doug, and for reminding about the cryo treatment (better talk softly, Ray hates this kind of voodoo stuff.... ). In re-reading Hirsch's thread, so far he seemed inconclusive about the results. Where does one send ones tubes to be cryo'ed?
post #68 of 99
OK, inside scoop is that pricing will be $1395 including stepped attenuator. This will be introductory pricing, with a very small window to pre-order that expires end of 2nd week in January. Apparently there will soon be an ad in Mall-Fi shortly with more details. No indication what final asking price will be beyond intro period.
post #69 of 99
Quote:
Originally posted by markl
I have a question about the tubes for anyone who can answer. Ray states you can use 12AU7, 12AT7, or 12AX7 for the input tube. This is good in that it opens up lots of possibilities for tube rolling. This is bad because it opens up lots of possibilities for tube-rolling. Can anyone tell me which of these tube types has more power, more gain, and is likely to last longer in this circuit? My guess is the tube that would work best is the one operating most easily within its abilities that can take it in stride, rather than one that has to struggle to pump out the juice you need. Or, is that faulty thinking, if so why?

Same question regarding the 6SN7s. From my ZOTL experience, I know there are 6SN7, 6SN7GT, 6SN7WGT, 6SN7GTA, 6SN7GTB, each a little different than the last (and even some other weirdos that aren't called "6SN7-anything" but have totally different name scheme that are sometimes substitutable for 6SN7s). Berning recos against using regular 6SN7s in his circuit, he preferes 6SN7GTBs for their slightly better power handling capabilities, IIRC.
No idea which tube variant to use at the input. The 12AU7 has the lowest gain, but may wind up being capable of maximal detail. I'd probably start with whatever Ray is using, as he's likely to have optimized the amp for that level of gain. In addition to the 12a*7's, you'll be able to use 6201's, 5693's, 5751's, 7025's and several others (bozebuttons mentioned the 7316, and I hope I haven't transposed any numbers anywhere ). It'll be a fun experience...there are a LOT of possibilities.

The problem with the GTB variants, as I understand it, is that in giving the tube higher voltage capabilities, the gap between the cathode and the plate was increased, resulting in higher capacitance. This increased capacitance can obscure fine detail, so in theory these tubes should not be able to handle the level of detail that a top GT variant can produce. There are still some fine sounding GTB's. The Tung Sol "tall boys" are one of my favorites, and were great with the ZOTL and CD3000 combo in particular.

IMO the Sylvania 6SN7GT (aka VT-231) is the tube to beat as an output buffer in the Singlepower amps (Metal base 6SN7W's are also excellent). However, if Ray's circuit is significantly different (and it appears to be), there's no way to know besides experimentation. The Tung Sol round plates or Ken-Rad VT-231's are my tubes of choice at the Singlepower input, but I have no idea how they would sound in Ray's amp.

The cryo thread does need updating. It's inconclusive mainly because I haven't reached any conclusions. I think there was a beneficial effect on Sylvania's and Sovteks. I couldn't hear any difference in Ken-Rads. Since it takes about a week to get a set of tubes up and stable, IME, it's a slow process, and I took a break to just go back to a set of reference tubes and listen.

If there's no change in the sound of the amp as you change tubes, that's almost a sure sign of a feedback loop or servo control in the circuit. The upside is that the designer has much greater control over the final sound of the amp, and it's easier to keep the circuit stable with a smaller power supply using feedback. The downside is that it makes it more difficult to hear the differences between tubes, which are still going to be there, just harder to hear. The actual contribution of the tube to the sound tends to be minimized...which can be good or bad depending on personal preference more than anything else.
post #70 of 99
Quote:
Originally posted by markl
OK, inside scoop is that pricing will be $1395 including stepped attenuator. This will be introductory pricing, with a very small window to pre-order that expires end of 2nd week in January. Apparently there will soon be an ad in Mall-Fi shortly with more details. No indication what final asking price will be beyond intro period.
Your "inside scoop" is correct but you should know that intro pricing is not likely to last for another three weeks. Final pricing will be much higher and you guys should know that Ray is making nothing on these amps sold at intro pricing. He is only selling them at this price because he promised to do so at the Detroit and Chicago meets even though his costs have increased significantly. Ray won't admit it but I do believe that he is actually selling the intro priced units at a loss. When I first saw the amp in a semi-production form he told myself and a few other head-fiers that he was going to only make 5% on the introductory sale.Since that time he decided to offer all the "optional upgrades" as standard parts. He says that he knows what he's doing but I wonder.

This is an insane deal for an amp of this quality. I have seen many,many audio components that had some really sturdy looking outer chassis work that have been touted as being "built like a tank" or to built to "Military spec". You look inside most of this gear and you may find some nice layouts and good quality parts but you should know that Ray Samuels actually designs and builds parts for Tanks,Military Jets and other Military apps. The parts used in his amps really are hand-matched and burned in,the super high quality boards are hand-soldered and tested and the amps are burned in using a real audio signal and not a test tone.

I know Ray to be one of those audio designers who tests the crap out of everything and I am usually not fond of these guys. I now know that he places highest priorty on sound quality,over perceived parts quality or test measurements. I know of no other audio gear, hand-built in the USA of this quality selling for anywhere near this price.
post #71 of 99
cool, so if i get drafted to the military anytime soon, will i get a sherman tank with a built in emmeline stealth ? : P

That's awesome, i didn't know any of that stuff. That says alot!
post #72 of 99
Hey Fred. How would you compare the Stealth to the ringer Twin Head MK II? Thanks
post #73 of 99
Thread Starter 
Tuberoller,

The power cord that Ray changed on the amp so that the un-anodized one is identical to production may take a while to burn in. I am guessing 5 or 6 years .

I have been listening to SACD's all day and I am truly enjoying this amp. One of the real benefits of using a preamp/headphone amp is the ability to have multiple sources connected at one time. I have the Sony, Meridian and Phillips all connected and with one click I can switch between them.

Quote:
Originally posted by Sovkiller
And how is the sound with the CD3000?????
I have been listening to the Dylan SACD remasters almost exclusively since Christmas morning. Going back and forth between 3 players. For most of this listening I have been using the CD-3000. I must say that based on two days of listening to Dylan I am very happy. Clarity without the feeling of harshness that the Sony's can sometimes exhibit. The harmonica that Bob uses in many of his pieces can be piercing and shrill on some equipment. I sounds to me like I am sitting in a rather small private venue and he is playing. The harmonica sounds as it should. I will be listening to some of my standards which include female vocals and some bass that really isn't present in a lot of Bob's work. More to follow later.

I am going to watch the Blackhawks tonight so I only have a few more hours of listening.
post #74 of 99
John-jcb,
If you still have your HDs I'd like know how they sound with the Stealth.
post #75 of 99
What are dimensions of the Stealth? Hard to tell from the photos.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Emmeline II The Stealth - Pictures 56K Warning