New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

New Beyer DT1350 - Page 78

post #1156 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by slwiser View Post


I am very glad you are enjoying your DT1350s but!  Considering that I think the iQube is essentially a very bright amp, I am surprised that you think it is not bright enough.  I don't think it is too bright but just right using any of my amps.  My Fostex HP-P1 is the brightest but not quite as bright as the iQube.  My HD-25s are darker than the DT1350s.  They seem to even have more of everything when pushed balanced even more open.  Enjoy....This shows we all enjoy different taste in sound profile and enjoy a different sound.



You are right. I prefer bright and airy sound by far. LCD-2 for instance is not my cup of tea at all. ER-4, T1 and SR325i is more to my taste. So the DT-1350 is the most bass heavy headphone I have at the moment since I sold the HD650. Still the DT-1350 has the detail-level and in spite of being closed it still doesn't have a congested sound which is why I like it. At the moment I am waiting for the T70p. I had the T70 for a while and it was the best closed headphone I have ever heard I am hoping the T70p will have a bit more sparkle in the mids.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #1157 of 1683

Gna be asking some very dumb/old questions but please bear with me because I just bought them from FS and I'm as excited as a kid now...

 

Given my previous experiences with all of my headphones, what should I be expecting from the dt1350s?

 

TF-10, GR-07, ATH-EW9, MS1000, D2000 and the HD580

 

 

Wanting comparisons bigsmile_face.gif

post #1158 of 1683

Just wanted to share a few pictures of my iQube + DT-1350 portable rig. 

 

6871394147_1318c9eb2d_b.jpg

 

6871392773_afb71de62c_b.jpg

post #1159 of 1683

It's been a while since I had the D2000, but I would say you can expect a richer and more forward midrange from the D1350, but less boomy bass and a smaller soundstage (though the D1350's soundstage is still fairly good for a closed phone).

 

I had TF10s for a while, it's hard to compare any IEM to a full-size but the TF10 was a bit V-shaped to me.  The 1350s are much more mid-range focused, and with more controlled bass.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrAdrian View Post

Gna be asking some very dumb/old questions but please bear with me because I just bought them from FS and I'm as excited as a kid now...

 

Given my previous experiences with all of my headphones, what should I be expecting from the dt1350s?

 

TF-10, GR-07, ATH-EW9, MS1000, D2000 and the HD580

 

 

Wanting comparisons bigsmile_face.gif

 

post #1160 of 1683

Do they sound mid-centric, or is it just because you are comparing them with the D2000 and TF10?
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj nellie View Post

It's been a while since I had the D2000, but I would say you can expect a richer and more forward midrange from the D1350, but less boomy bass and a smaller soundstage (though the D1350's soundstage is still fairly good for a closed phone).

 

I had TF10s for a while, it's hard to compare any IEM to a full-size but the TF10 was a bit V-shaped to me.  The 1350s are much more mid-range focused, and with more controlled bass.

 

 



 

post #1161 of 1683

Hey Rasmushorn, I see you still enjoying the DT1350 beerchug.gif I do too. You said that you would like them to be a bit more extended or hot on top so I'm currently experimenting with mine (based on another member recommended MOD).

 

My DT1350 look like this inside. They are the first generation I guess. You can see the black felt damping in the cup (two layer) as you can see on the back of the driver their is a hole that allow the driver diaphragm to breath. The problem that was reported is that the black felt does press on the driver and block that breathing hole (Make them sound a bit weird). By adding another layer of foam (2 - 4 mm thick) it allow better breathing (Foam less dense than felt). I currently have a 4 mm memory foam type and can notice better hi's and reduce bass. The mid remain unchanged for me. I actually want to try a thinner foam to get some of the bass back. They are also a lot easier to open compared to the T50p (IMO) 

 

3dcaa6d3_1350mod2.jpeg1dfc2bb0_1350mod3.jpeg

 

If your DT1350 look like this inside the result of the MOD might be different. I believed this is the latest model.

 

8ee3a357_6271902961_939f6ab69c.jpeg
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by rasmushorn View Post

Just wanted to share a few pictures of my iQube + DT-1350 portable rig. 

 

6871394147_1318c9eb2d_b.jpg

 

6871392773_afb71de62c_b.jpg



 

post #1162 of 1683

The 1350s are definitely mid-centric IMO, both compared to those headphones and in an absolute sense.  I don't feel that the mids are artificially forward though.  It's a nice sound signature option to have, especially if you already have some V-shaped headphones.

post #1163 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinster View Post

Hey Rasmushorn, I see you still enjoying the DT1350 beerchug.gif I do too. You said that you would like them to be a bit more extended or hot on top so I'm currently experimenting with mine (based on another member recommended MOD).

 

My DT1350 look like this inside. They are the first generation I guess. You can see the black felt damping in the cup (two layer) as you can see on the back of the driver their is a hole that allow the driver diaphragm to breath. The problem that was reported is that the black felt does press on the driver and block that breathing hole (Make them sound a bit weird). By adding another layer of foam (2 - 4 mm thick) it allow better breathing (Foam less dense than felt). I currently have a 4 mm memory foam type and can notice better hi's and reduce bass. The mid remain unchanged for me. I actually want to try a thinner foam to get some of the bass back. They are also a lot easier to open compared to the T50p (IMO) 

 


Thanks for the advice Twinster. I promised myself that I would never ever open a Beyerdynamic headphone again since my T50p broke apart when I tried to change the cable on them :-)

I do also think that they sound great just as they are so I am not keen to begin modding them right now. 

 

post #1164 of 1683

Here is the easiest mod for the DT1350 I have seen.  I just applied the HD-25 velour pads right over the existing pads: (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/352733-REG/Sennheiser_069417_Replacement_Velour_Earpads_for.html )

 

Here is a picture of what it looks like:

 HD25padsonDT1350.jpg

 

This makes the sound move toward the HD-25 a bit while maintaining the precision, attack of the DT1350.  The mids are even more smooth using these pads while the bass is maintained tight like I like it.  The extension of the original is still there giving me the air I enjoyed.   This sounds great everyone should try this mod.

 

BTW, going between the Fostex HP-P1 singled ended to the RSA SR-71B is like going between a portable to a full size headphone with these DT1350s.  The soundstage and air is so much greater going balanced.  With the full size headphones going balanced that I have heard in the past (HD650) I thought the balanced sound gave is an incoherent sound but with this headphone the soundstage is just right.  Now to listen to the ALO Continental v2 single ended and make this same comparison.  WOW the ALO Continental takes this single ended very near to the soundstage of the balanced SR-71B....The ALO Continental V2 is very much in the same league as the SR-71B... With the ALO some things are as good while some are not quite at the same level as with the SR-71B but overall very good...


Edited by slwiser - 2/21/12 at 3:55am
post #1165 of 1683

How comfortable would you say these are? (In itself and compared to other headphones)

post #1166 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by noona1227 View Post

How comfortable would you say these are? (In itself and compared to other headphones)


Compared to what?  Supra aural headphones aren't usually very comfortable and the DT1350s don't buck that trend.  If you're situation lets you get full size 'phones I'd go with those instead.  If not then the 1350s won't really be much better or worse than most supra aurals.

post #1167 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by slwiser View Post

 

Here is a picture of what it looks like:

 HD25padsonDT1350.jpg

 

 


why didnt I thought of that!

looks like my red velour pads are going to be on use again

 

post #1168 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by maverickronin View Post


Compared to what?  Supra aural headphones aren't usually very comfortable and the DT1350s don't buck that trend.  If you're situation lets you get full size 'phones I'd go with those instead.  If not then the 1350s won't really be much better or worse than most supra aurals.


 

Compared to other supra aural headphones like the Senn hd-25 or the V-MODA?

post #1169 of 1683
Quote:
Originally Posted by noona1227 View Post


 

Compared to other supra aural headphones like the Senn hd-25 or the V-MODA?



the M80 is the most comfortable for me, little pressure, and little isolation.

the DT1350 provides the most isolation but also the most uncomfortable

HD25 isolates a great doal tho, and my old pair is very comfortable, it wasnt like  that brand new.

post #1170 of 1683
Quote:

Originally Posted by JamesMcProgger View Post

 

the M80 is the most comfortable for me, little pressure, and little isolation.

the DT1350 provides the most isolation but also the most uncomfortable

HD25 isolates a great doal tho, and my old pair is very comfortable, it wasnt like  that brand new.


But for me of all three I will take my DT1350 to any of the others based on sound.  I take them off every so often anyway.  Yes, I have had owned all three and returned the M80, maybe I did not give it enough time but thought that it was somewhere between the other two and did not need to keep them.  Now with the ear pads on the DT1350 I have put the HD25 on the shelf for a while and only listening to the DT1350 balanced at work. 


Edited by slwiser - 2/22/12 at 3:37pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gear mentioned in this thread: