Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › Questions about how cables are made and how do different cables sound different?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Questions about how cables are made and how do different cables sound different? - Page 3

post #31 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post

If the less-expensive cables don't transmit the entire signal, then why doesn't that show up in measurements?

Since high-end cables are all built with different materials and different design philosophies, then how come all of them "work"? Shouldn't it be that some designs work while others don't? Yet you get testimonial "evidence" that all of them, purportedly, "work." How can that be?

If every design "works," then the cheap cables ought to work the same as any design, since it appears that any design - even ones contradictory to other designs - "works." Which actually seems to bear out with testing. There is no difference, as far as anyone can tell.

If testing and measurements are, somehow, inadequate, then why do they bear out with cables for high power or high frequencies? Those cables behave according to known physics and prove to be measurable and predictable. Why do measurements and testing work for these applications, but not for audio frequencies?

Also interesting is that - supposedly - unmeasurable differences can be "heard" in cables. The odd part there is that the resistors and caps in your amps aren't perfectly matched. You might have a 100.79 Ohm resistor on the left channel and a 100.12 Ohm resistor on the right channel. These slight variations are in every amp and can be measured accurately with a $10 DMM. Not only that, but you'll be able to measure slight differences in output due to that, as well. By the way, that example is within a 1% tolerance, which is excellent. You'll commonly find tolerances in the 10%-15% range for lots of parts. You might very well have a 96 Ohm and a 103 Ohm resistor mirroring each other in an amp's channels. That's within the tolerances of lots of gear out there. You'd be surprised if you actually knew what was inside most amps.

If a believer's ears are so golden to notice unmeasurable differences in cables, then why are they unable to hear the measurable differences between the channels in their amp? Why aren't people hooting and hollering because of the measurable differences between channels? The differences are unquestionably there. I can prove it with any amp, and so can anyone else.

If you people are saying that you can hear unmeasurable differences in cables while not being able to hear a 5% variation between channels in your amp, you've got your heads screwed on funny. If you don't believe me, go get a $10 DMM and start measuring what's inside your amps. Measure your sources, too. You'll be lucky if you have 5% or less of variation between channels. You'll probably find a 10% variation or larger between parts in each channel.

Yet I've never seen a single cable believer who notices this measurable difference between left and right. Not once.

By the way, you can get tight tolerances between channels. Most of us DIY'ers have gear like that. For the crossovers in my ProAc Response 2.5 clones, I bought extra parts for careful hand-matching. It cost me about $100 more and took a few hours to sort through and label the measurements of everything. Since I had to unwind the inductors for certain unmanufactured values, I was able to measure them myself and got them very close in each channel. I spent a couple of hours doing this, as well.

If you think hours of very careful hand-matching and a bunch of wasted caps and resistors went into your $500 DAC or amp, I have news for you. Again, go measure for yourself. There's a lot of variation between components marked with the same value. I invite all of you to pick up a meter and start measuring your own gear.

When the reality of 10%-15% variation sinks in, ask yourself how it's possible to not hear that unquestionable variation while also "hearing" a variation with cables that have no measurable differences.

The differences you think you hear aren't really there.


Thank you, thank you, thank you.  I knew of the relatively large tolerances in crossovers and amps (DC voltage bias, anyone?) but for some reason it never occurred to me to bring that up with the cable debate...

 

That reminds me - scroll down about half way here until you see the giant four-tower Infinity speakers:

http://www.6moons.com/audioreviews/roadtour13/roadtour13.html

 

It's worth a read - he unglued and replaced 480 magnets for the EMIM midrange drivers (each has 20!), and measured the resistance of each of the 72 (!) EMIT tweeters and spent the time matching drivers between the sides.  I can't even begin to imagine how long that took...

post #32 of 121


 

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post

Since high-end cables are all built with different materials and different design philosophies, then how come all of them "work"? Shouldn't it be that some designs work while others don't? Yet you get testimonial "evidence" that all of them, purportedly, "work." How can that be?
 

Uncle Erik, you increasingly repeat this particular point these days, but it doesn’t make sense to me. It seems fundamentally illogical thinking..

 

In all walks of life, there are different ways of achieving the same end. There’s no right or wrong, it’s a matter of balancing the different characteristics of different designs to get to the designer’s objectives.

 

Take car engines. There’s petrol, diesel, turbo charged, super charged, piston, rotary, etc. They all get the car from A to B in a broadly similar manner, but each design has characteristics which affect the way that’s achieved.

 

Take amplifiers. There’s solid state, tube, hybrid, class A, class B, Class AB, etc. There’s no one right design. 

 

Back to cables. Take something relatively non controversial like RFI. It can be reduced by, for example, conductor weave, or shielding, or filtering via network boxes, etc. Designers go down the path they think will be most effective. In all cases, the end result is some level of RFI reduction, but each method has its own characteristics which MAY affect the listening experience.

 

By all means, continue your cable bashing posts, but I suggest you stick to measurements, DBT, profit margins, placebo and marketing claims. I don’t always agree with your conclusions on these either, but at least your logic is on firmer ground wink_face.gif

post #33 of 121
Quote:
Uncle Erik, you increasingly repeat this particular point these days, but it doesn’t make sense to me. It seems fundamentally illogical thinking..

 

In all walks of life, there are different ways of achieving the same end. There’s no right or wrong, it’s a matter of balancing the different characteristics of different designs to get to the designer’s objectives.

 

Take car engines. There’s petrol, diesel, turbo charged, super charged, piston, rotary, etc. They all get the car from A to B in a broadly similar manner, but each design has characteristics which affect the way that’s achieved.

Analogies work for a while but eventually fail, like cars.

 

Of course: I could actually answer an analogous question about cars ("If I wanted more torque and didn't care about MPG, how would I get it" or the like). Can you please do the same for cables?

post #34 of 121

JerryLove, the car engine was not an analogy, it was an example to back up my point that, in all walks of life, different designs can be successful at achieving a similar objective. The RFI was an example to show that this "rule" applies equally well to cables. I didn't understand your question at the end.

post #35 of 121

Eh. Instead of constantly theorizing, hasn't there been someone with equipment who took different cables and measured the frequency output for differences? If cables affect signal transmission then by all rights this should be the most obvious (and measurable) independent variable, isn't it?

post #36 of 121
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenni View Post


.....

 

Prog Rock Man, with all due respect, some of your comments strikes me as somewhat "naive". for example the credence that the perceived sound difference with some cables is an increase in volume is... naive (yes, I know some cables can make the sound louder). I use the volume control of the amp extensively on a daily basis: I know exactly how the system sound at different volume controls. let me tell you the difference I hear with some audio cables has nothing to do with increase in volume. but whatever...
 
....


It is not my 'naivety', I am saying that others are 'naive' to hear slight differences in volume and use that as a sign that cables are different in terms of night and day improvement to sound and other such claims. Can you relate the differences you hear to different types of cable construction?

post #37 of 121
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAttorney View Post


 

Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post

Since high-end cables are all built with different materials and different design philosophies, then how come all of them "work"? Shouldn't it be that some designs work while others don't? Yet you get testimonial "evidence" that all of them, purportedly, "work." How can that be?
 

Uncle Erik, you increasingly repeat this particular point these days, but it doesn’t make sense to me. It seems fundamentally illogical thinking..

 

In all walks of life, there are different ways of achieving the same end. There’s no right or wrong, it’s a matter of balancing the different characteristics of different designs to get to the designer’s objectives.

 

Take car engines. There’s petrol, diesel, turbo charged, super charged, piston, rotary, etc. They all get the car from A to B in a broadly similar manner, but each design has characteristics which affect the way that’s achieved.

 

Take amplifiers. There’s solid state, tube, hybrid, class A, class B, Class AB, etc. There’s no one right design. 

 

Back to cables. Take something relatively non controversial like RFI. It can be reduced by, for example, conductor weave, or shielding, or filtering via network boxes, etc. Designers go down the path they think will be most effective. In all cases, the end result is some level of RFI reduction, but each method has its own characteristics which MAY affect the listening experience.

 

By all means, continue your cable bashing posts, but I suggest you stick to measurements, DBT, profit margins, placebo and marketing claims. I don’t always agree with your conclusions on these either, but at least your logic is on firmer ground wink_face.gif

 

Yes there are different ways of achieving the same end. What UE and I and others are arguing is that all those different cables are achieving the same end, so whist it may appear they are different, in fact they are not, as in terms of audibility (the same) they are the same.

post #38 of 121

Nope. Sure did not notice it when I flipped it on and walked into the office while it was playing each time *LOL*

 

To the point and to be brutally BLUNT.... Like freaking lemmings to a cliff people constantly shell out hilarious amounts of cash on things that literally DO NOTHING for them. But I totally understand that ridiculous things like electrical testing, signal testing, proof, facts, reality and physics will not keep one from shelling out countless hard earned dollars for something they think they can hear as they get emotionally attached to the new piece of fancy cord they just purchased. After all, it cost a ton, has a lot of fancy speak in the brochure and some guy in the internet says they will give you a sonic orgasm. The hard facts are when it comes down to it, so called hardcore audiophiles have a hard time telling the difference between a garbage swap meet amplifier with a circuit board that looks to have been made using scissors and a pie tin and an audiophile $10,000 amplifier. If the measurements are flat and distortion is within reason that is. Back to the point, us so called believers in the evil cult of science are just trying to snap all of the 10/6th loons on the planet back into this dimension. Literally makes me sick to see companies making insane claims only to watch countless people follow them saying OMG WOW! I can hear it also! $500 is soo worth it for that piece of 5' wire that will deliver me to sonic nirvana that cost $10 to produce! For god sakes, cat 6 copper can carry a perfect signal to 550mhz and a 7' length costs $3. Yet somehow our narrow audible range of around 20-20Khz which is the electrical equivalent of having one turning a light switch on and off it is so slow, somehow needs a cable costing more than a mortgage payment. Use that hard earned cash to buy some new gear, items that DO make a difference like a new set of cans, new speakers for the house... anything that does make a difference.

 

One day I truly hope that all of these boutique style rip off wire peddlers get sued or told to take the BS off of their sites and stop misleading people with wacko claims. I see one power cable provider was told to do so, hope there is a WAVE to follow!

 

Ok time to end my tequila slushy filled rant. If I even get through to ONE person, writing the above was SOOOO worth it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd R View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by Garage1217 View Post

To be honest, I have NEVER been able to hear an actual difference in any cables unless there was an issue with the cable design, a break in the cable, cable did not have proper shielding for the environment or the plug itself was seriously damaged and not making proper contact. To me, if I cannot hear a difference when doing back to back a/b comparisons during critical listening then it is just snake oil. I do however have zero issue paying for a well made cable "within reason" as build quality is important to me. For me, unless someone can show scientifically why a cable of equal length made from copper, silver or gold, making proper contact would physically sound different to the human ear then it is all crap and marketing to me. Most would be better plucking a few ear hairs "which is a DIY mod haha" to achieve a different or better sound

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garage1217 View Post

Funny story.. I come home and start watching a movie. After 5 minutes the receiver goes into protect. I reset it and watch again for 5 minutes and poof, she shuts down. So I unplug all 22,000 cables from the back of my old school receiver... take it to the shop, blow it out.. test the fan... Make a mini test setup testing each channel and all was good (an hour and a half later). So I put it all back in, plug it in and in 5 minutes it goes into protect. I start troubleshooting each component and then isolated it to one of the speaker channels after another hour... Then the wife walks in the door and says "oh, by the way, I think I knocked one of those gold connector thingies out of the back of that speaker but I put it back in, pointing to the front right. I look behind and she plugged the one banana plugs into the other causing a direct short haha. Lucky no damage to the receiver. Was a fantastic night.


Seriously?

Can't hear any differences between cables, so upgraded cables must be "snake oil".

YET...

Can't tell that the front right speaker on his HT system isn't working until his wife tells him she messed with it?

Hilarious

post #39 of 121


Quote:

Originally Posted by JerryLove View Post

Quote:
Uncle Erik, you increasingly repeat this particular point these days, but it doesn’t make sense to me. It seems fundamentally illogical thinking..

 

In all walks of life, there are different ways of achieving the same end. There’s no right or wrong, it’s a matter of balancing the different characteristics of different designs to get to the designer’s objectives.

 

Take car engines. There’s petrol, diesel, turbo charged, super charged, piston, rotary, etc. They all get the car from A to B in a broadly similar manner, but each design has characteristics which affect the way that’s achieved.

Analogies work for a while but eventually fail, like cars.

 

Of course: I could actually answer an analogous question about cars ("If I wanted more torque and didn't care about MPG, how would I get it" or the like). Can you please do the same for cables?

See that is what cable worshipers fail to understand.... PHYSICS. That torque is not going to be made from someone replacing their non corroded / factory electrical system with all polished copper with silver plated, purple painted super wire with gravitational field altering jacketing infused with moon dust. Nor will it bring out the highs in the exhaust note. But I guarantee if someone did it, you would have a testimonial from hundreds of others that tried it claiming they picked up another second in the 1320.
 

post #40 of 121

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheAttorney View Post

JerryLove, the car engine was not an analogy, it was an example to back up my point that, in all walks of life, different designs can be successful at achieving a similar objective. The RFI was an example to show that this "rule" applies equally well to cables. I didn't understand your question at the end.


You cannot, by example, establish that *all* cases are true.

 

"All animals have four legs: for example a dog, a cat, a horse".

 

If that's what you were attempting to accomplish, to prove that all things have multiple paths for identical outcomes you've failed several levels of logic.

 

Are you saying that, like automobile engines, cables have that trait? Then (since you skipped the word "like", which would make it a simile), you have a metaphor.

 

Regardless, as pointed out, it's not a useful metaphor. Those technologies are different in understood, describable, and measurable ways... and the analogous question, also as pointed out, could be answered.

post #41 of 121

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightslayer View Post

Eh. Instead of constantly theorizing, hasn't there been someone with equipment who took different cables and measured the frequency output for differences? If cables affect signal transmission then by all rights this should be the most obvious (and measurable) independent variable, isn't it?


Of course. Plenty of people have. A sensitive instrument can find differences in basically every cable. If nothing else, length changes affect delay (an electric wave travels at around 180,000 miles / second).

 

But then we need to qualify those changes (measurements quantify). Is there any indications of changes in the audio bands meeting a reasonable threshold of human hearing? No. Can we show that people can actually tell cables apart by sound? No.

post #42 of 121

Uncle Erik - You make some solid and convincing points. Out of curiosity, do you think correctly made silver speaker/headphone cables sound different to correctly made copper cables? From my understanding of your post, you imply that you don't think it makes a difference.

 

I'm aware its a pretty common held belief that silver adds treble and copper is "warmer". but  haven't had the opportunity to test it myself yet.

post #43 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulvy View Post

Uncle Erik - You make some solid and convincing points. Out of curiosity, do you think correctly made silver speaker/headphone cables sound different to correctly made copper cables? From my understanding of your post, you imply that you don't think it makes a difference.

 

I'm aware its a pretty common held belief that silver adds treble and copper is "warmer". but  haven't had the opportunity to test it myself yet.


If you believe that crud then have I got something for you:

powerBandMagic.jpg

post #44 of 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wulvy View Post


Uncle Erik - You make some solid and convincing points. Out of curiosity, do you think correctly made silver speaker/headphone cables sound different to correctly made copper cables? From my understanding of your post, you imply that you don't think it makes a difference.



 



I'm aware its a pretty common held belief that silver adds treble and copper is "warmer". but  haven't had the opportunity to test it myself yet.




 

All that seems part of the folklore and mythology here. I haven't heard a difference between copper and silver. Neither do I see measured differences or anyone being able to tell the difference in listening tests.

It isn't up to end users to demonstrate the difference, either. If I were selling silver cables, I'd want to put up measurements and/or listening tests to confirm that my product worked. Not only that, but it would make for excellent marketing. If I could demonstrate that my product was better than the competition, I'd open fire on competitors with that. Thisnis Marketing 101. What's surprising is that not one single manufacturer does this. Do you really think that manufacturers haven't considered this? I'm sure every one has.

But every other sector of audio has no problem going head-to-head with competition. Headphones, speakers, amps, and sources all give you technical reasons to buy their products. Cable manufacturers don't. Weird, becuse they'd be able to get sales and marketshare if they did - just like all other products do.

It doesn't make any business sense. Unless, of course, you know you're selling a product indistinguishable from every other product in the market. In that case, you'd market based on reputation and testimonials, which they do.
post #45 of 121

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wulvy View Post

Uncle Erik - You make some solid and convincing points. Out of curiosity, do you think correctly made silver speaker/headphone cables sound different to correctly made copper cables? From my understanding of your post, you imply that you don't think it makes a difference.

 

I'm aware its a pretty common held belief that silver adds treble and copper is "warmer". but  haven't had the opportunity to test it myself yet.


You forgot the brown cables and their chocolaty sound!

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › Questions about how cables are made and how do different cables sound different?