Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › AUDEZ'E versus WHARFEDALE ISODYNAMICS?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

AUDEZ'E versus WHARFEDALE ISODYNAMICS?

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 

Has anyone actually done a direct comparison between the (Original planar!) Wharfedale and the LCD-2?

The Wharfedale certainly sounds good, even at 40 years old; but wondering if the LCD-2 has improved on the starter!

 

Obviously age affects the mylar after time, I guess.

Would love to hear (literally too!)

Chris in Bristol

post #2 of 6

I've heard both, but on different occasions and not in depth. They were my favourite headphones at the respective meets where I heard them. I couldn't begin to offer a comparison sadly.

post #3 of 6
Thread Starter 

Looks like no-one has compared them directly (so far....) though I'm sure SOMEONE must have?

Am happy with the Iso's sound, but the rave reviews of the LCD-2s pique the interest!

post #4 of 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocellia View Post

Looks like no-one has compared them directly (so far....) though I'm sure SOMEONE must have?

Am happy with the Iso's sound, but the rave reviews of the LCD-2s pique the interest!


I finally have them both going here. It's a very nice comparison to make, as you thought :-)

 

If you are still around, is there actually a problem with your Wharfedale Isodynamic? A buzz, maybe?

 

post #5 of 6
Thread Starter 

No; Wharfedales fine!

So? How's the comparison? Apart from difference in efficiency of course!

The LCD-2s get raves. But, that much better than the originators?

Have I saved myself $995? (-:

As I'm happy often with my 30+ year old bits,this would complete the picture!

(AS well as my Pass F3/Ocellia Calliopes!)

post #6 of 6

Subscribed :)

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › AUDEZ'E versus WHARFEDALE ISODYNAMICS?