Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Death of Liner Notes
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Death of Liner Notes - Page 2

post #16 of 21

Great singles remind me of AM radio, Top 40, fluff, "barely scratch the surface" type of music.  In looking at one band for example...."Mama's Gotta Squeeze Box" (Who By Numbers) and "Pinball Wizard" (Tommy) were played all over radio but don't even remotely begin to the depth of the conception of those releases.  So much is missing.

post #17 of 21
Thread Starter 
Your frame of reference is too narrow. Armstrong's Muskrat Ramble was a single and it changed the world of music. Hank Williams' Six More Miles To The Graveyard or Billie Holliday's Strange Fruit are anything but fluff. Elvis was heard more on singles in his prime than on LPs. Duke Ellington, Benny Goodman, Billie Holiday, Bing Crosby, Glenn Miller... even Enrico Caruso and Stokowski and the Philadelphians became famous based on their singles. The early Beatles records were largely just groups of singles packaged together, and the order of the songs was dictated by what singles were available In the US and which were available in the UK.

The "concept album" didn't exist until Frank Sinatra's Songs For Swinging Lovers. By that time there had already been half a century of recorded music... all on singles. Even long after Sinatra, many forms of music, primarily those aimed at radio (Do Wop, Rock n Roll, Pop Music, Ethnic, Country Western, etc) were based on the single, not the LP. It wasn't until the 70s when singles began to fall out of favor.

You are assuming that all recorded music is like the small amount of music that you're familiar with.
Edited by bigshot - 12/21/10 at 6:58pm
post #18 of 21


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshot View Post

Your frame of reference is too narrow.

You are assuming that all recorded music is like the small amount of music that you're familiar with.


RE: Frame of reference…comparing singles that changed the world before there were actually long-playing albums with those from later eras skews the argument a bit, doesn't it? Not only were those tracks made for radio or whatever, but because there was no album format the singles of that time are pretty much all that were available to consumers. As Spyro suggested, by the time the Who started recording the marketplace was different and singles only scratched the surface of what was available on LP. With all due respect, bigshot, it sounds more like the assumptions/desires are yours…different periods in the music industry's history can't be accurately assessed based on the one you're most happy with…it's simply apples and oranges…

post #19 of 21
Thread Starter 
The first half of the twentieth century was one of the biggest creative flowerings ever. The last half proceeded to dismantle most of what was gained. It may be that the fact that singles were the format that built modern music is just a coincidence. But it is certainly valid evidence that returning to a singles based format in the digital age is not necessarily a bad thing for music.
post #20 of 21

I also like the album concept. The current trend to release singles only is utterly disappointing. I also like to read the liner notes.

post #21 of 21

I believe the death of liner notes actually came many years ago when some lazy record executive twit decided it was too much effort to write a short explanation of the band's latest activities, the making of the album, what cool musician sat in to play piano on track 5, etc., and just filled up the space with a copy of the lyrics to every song. I'd much rather read about Eric Clapton and Duane Allman meeting, than someone explaining to me what I just heard was, Layla, you've got me on my knees, Layla, I'm begging, darlin' please.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Death of Liner Notes