Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › What DAC will drive my HD650's appropriately?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

What DAC will drive my HD650's appropriately?

post #1 of 19
Thread Starter 

I got my HD580's with HD650 drivers. I am currently using the out of my uDac. Incredible in comparison with my Grado's. 

They lack bass. I find my Grado's had more bass (SR225i). I am assuming this is because they are not being driven well. So I need a strong DAC.

 

I would get an amp but I would rather get a powerful DAC like the Audinst and sell my uDac to cut my losses. 

Is the Audinst MX-1 a good match?

post #2 of 19

The uDac is combination of a DAC (Digital-Analog-Converter) and headphone amp. An amp is what that "drives" the headphone and a DAC converts the digital signal to analog .

I doubt the HD650 drivers are getting driven well with a uDac (not a powerful amp).

post #3 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by lessblue View Post

The uDac is combination of a DAC (Digital-Analog-Converter) and headphone amp. An amp is what that "drives" the headphone and a DAC converts the digital signal to analog .

I doubt the HD650 drivers are getting driven well with a uDac (not a powerful amp).



This. Look at separating them first.

post #4 of 19
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossmd View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by lessblue View Post

The uDac is combination of a DAC (Digital-Analog-Converter) and headphone amp. An amp is what that "drives" the headphone and a DAC converts the digital signal to analog .

I doubt the HD650 drivers are getting driven well with a uDac (not a powerful amp).



This. Look at separating them first.


Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I am wondering what combo out there is powerful enough. I am considering getting a Schiit Asgard and pairing it with my uDac but I am not sure how good of a source it really is.

post #5 of 19
I'd buy a good amp before finding a better DAC/amp. Separates generally make more sense because new DAC chips roll out every 12-18 months and people aren't always interested in buying "old" technology. Amps don't change much, so you could keep one for years and change the DAC more often.

Though don't get too hung up on sources. I know the "source first" thing has some traction around here. However, keep in mind that was part of a marketing campaign 40 years ago and the guy who started it thought that the biggest audiophile sin was to have an undriven speaker in the same room as a powered one. Don't ask me to explain that one.
post #6 of 19
Thread Starter 

For amps, a B Stock Schiit Asgard should suffice, right? I see that the LD MK3 is also high on the list but shipping is $45. Making the cost $245. So, eh...

post #7 of 19

Alex have you poked around in those threads on the audio gd nfb11 or nfb12 yet. I really like my Sparrow and the nfb11 and nfb12 look like the Sparrow on steroids for not a whole lot more money.

post #8 of 19
Thread Starter 

I am going with the Schiit for obvious reasons...XD

post #9 of 19

Do what you want but that nfb 11 for example may perform similar to the Nuforce HDP for 1/2 the cost of the HDP. If I were you I'd at least go read through the threads. They are probably improvements as a source and definitely as an amp. The NFB 11 uses the same Sabre DAC chip as the HDP which is a better chip than what is in your uDAC. The NFB 12 has dual Wolfson chips which is what is in the Audinst and both USB connections are 24/96 which is an improvement over the uDAC and I imagine one of the reasons you liked the Audinst. And the Amp sections in the Audio GD''s are not at all wimpy. Bottom line is they look good and they perform well if my Sparrow is any indication. Finally you shouldn start a thread looking for suggestions if you've already made up your mind. Hey if after you read through the  NFB threads and maybe participate a little you find you still want an Asgard at least you will have done your due dilligence.

post #10 of 19

Uncle Eric makes a very good point.

 

As owner of both I can tell you that Audinst and HD650 make a very listenable combo and a pleasing experience.

However it's far from a doing proper justice to these headphones. Driving them by a good amp (M-Stage, M3, etc) and a better source reveals a whole new side and dimension to the headphones.

All of this is just obscured or muted on lesser equipment.

 

post #11 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by lessblue View Post

The uDac is combination of a DAC (Digital-Analog-Converter) and headphone amp. An amp is what that "drives" the headphone and a DAC converts the digital signal to analog .

 

I do not disagree with your general idea, but the irony of it is that uDAC actually uses the DAC chip to drive the headphones.

The entire output stage is built in the Sabre ESS 9022.

post #12 of 19
Thread Starter 

Well, you see, Schiit has a good deal. That plus a five year warranty and excellent customer support might just win me over. 

post #13 of 19

Just out of curiosity Alex what are the obvious reasons for getting the Asgard and is Schiit doing something right now that makes the Asgard more appealing price wise. What does Schiit has a good deal mean?  I get the appeal of it because I seriously considered buying it myself and feeding it with the uDAC. Sold the uDAC to defray the costs of my new purchase. Of course keeping the uDAC and using it as a source to feed an amp is a a very legitimate and reasonable idea. As long as your head isnt full of shiit biggrin.gif

 

Sorry about that couldnt resist. Just playing devils advocate here knowing your penchant for being frugal and trying to get the most bang for your buck. Not sure if you read any of those threads or not but one of the reasons I chose the Sparrow is Audio GD's reputation around here. They had or have the Zero, the Compass, the Fun, the Sparrow, and now the NSB 11 and NSB 12. And that's just their budget stuff. They've got some really expensive shiit too.

 

All I'm trying to tell you is before you get seduced by the idea of a dedicated amp that's all the rage do some due dilligence, shop around a little, educate yourself on some other gear that's available. If one of the reasons you are so enamoured with the Asgard is because it's going to look good sitting on your desk, just know that the Audio GD stuff has a little eyeball too

 

NFB121s.JPG  NFB122s.JPG

post #14 of 19
Thread Starter 

Like Uncle Erik said, amps last. Also it seems the general consensus is that upgrading the (digital) source benefits the sound less than an amp (of equal value). And FWIR the downfall on the uDac is the built in amp, the DAC is still good. What can you expect?

Schiit is in the US. Thus great customer service and low shipping cost. And seeing as this is a present from my parents, it will be a hell of a lot easier convincing them to order from Schiit than to order from this and paying $35 for shipping. 

5 year warranty and quick email response to questions really just seals the deal. Call me closed minded but it is the obvious choice since I also currently have Senn's.

post #15 of 19

Fair enough Alex. the headphone out on the uDAC is a problem, no argument here. It's supposed to function quite capably as a source though, so it will be a great source for feeding an amp like the Asgard. Which is precisely why I considered the same combo myself. I got my Sparrow from Pacific Valve in Illinois though and their price included free shipping. Total price was the same as ordering direct from Audio GD and paying shipping. Got it from them because they offer a 30 day return policy and they will service the unit if there is an issue. I apologize if it seemed like I was trying to change your mind, when actually all I was trying to articulate is the threads on the NSB 11 and NSB 12 were worth the time it would take to peruse them. Enjoy your new headphones and whatever you end up getting to plug them into.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › What DAC will drive my HD650's appropriately?