Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › 1964 Ears (The Appreciation Thread)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1964 Ears (The Appreciation Thread) - Page 245

post #3661 of 3850
2/1/13 at 5:45am

Unfortunately, unless both were measured in exactly the same manner on the same equipment, those graphs don't really tell us anything.

Reply

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #3662 of 3850
2/1/13 at 2:53pm

Are there V6 owners that listen to metal? How do you rate them?

 

I would describe thrash metal as not having bass. I owned RE262 and they have flat frequency and thought they were great. Could have done with more bass sure but I learned to live with them.

 

Little bit lost with what to choose right now.

Reply
post #3663 of 3850
2/1/13 at 4:16pm

I'd like to see Han Bo Quan chime in. I won't have my V6 for a few weeks so unfortunately I cannot help.

Reply
post #3664 of 3850
2/2/13 at 8:28am

I listen to Progressive metal as you can tell from my avatar. Though I definitely prefer my Stax system V6 do a great job with it too. But they are very revealing, so some metal bands do not have top notch recordings and if your source is poor too, then you may get a "meh" experience. If your entire chain is right up to task until the headphones, V6 are great for metal. 

Reply
post #3665 of 3850
2/2/13 at 11:28am

Still properly torn between the V6 and the Mage. A lot of my favorite albums are from 88 so they dont always sound good.

Reply
post #3666 of 3850
2/2/13 at 11:41am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Defiant00 View Post

Unfortunately, unless both were measured in exactly the same manner on the same equipment, those graphs don't really tell us anything.

I agree, looking at graphs do not tell the whole story. It seems to be a recurring debate as to the value of graphs.

 

I believe if grahs are used the person posting should disclose if same measuring equipment was used and if the set up was calibrated.Grabbing graphs from the internet is hardly material to base an advise on.

Reply
post #3667 of 3850
2/5/13 at 12:24am
Hello guys,
Did someone experienced a v3's bass came lesser after run in or burn in? V3 and v6 which one will be recommended for vocals? thanks!
Reply
post #3668 of 3850
2/7/13 at 10:37am

Nice new video from Vitaliy and the gang over at 1964 EARS. Enjoy!

 

 

 

 

 

Reply
post #3669 of 3850
2/7/13 at 3:41pm

saw the video. few days ago. great video!

Reply
post #3670 of 3850
2/7/13 at 6:49pm

Nice video for 1964 Ears!etysmile.gif

But someone please tell me which one between v3 or v6's vocal are better?

I'm now searching for a CIEM in 1964Ears to replace my SE535LTD.

And I demand a tight bass and a smooth and large soundstage with a slightly forward vocal. Any recommendation ?

Thanks so much!

Reply
post #3671 of 3850
2/7/13 at 8:01pm

I like the lab coats the staff wear - they're scientists!
 

Reply
post #3672 of 3850
2/7/13 at 8:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericp10 View Post

Nice new video from Vitaliy and the gang over at 1964 EARS. Enjoy!

 

 

 

VIDEO

 

 

I have to get one of those shirts.

Reply
post #3673 of 3850
2/8/13 at 4:00am

Nice video.  (best part 0.50,hehe).

Btw ,i am curious to read your review,Eric.

Reply
post #3674 of 3850
2/8/13 at 8:33am
delete
Reply
post #3675 of 3850
2/8/13 at 8:34am
Quote:
Originally Posted by antberg View Post

Nice video.  (best part 0.50,hehe).

Btw ,i am curious to read your review,Eric.

beerchug.gif

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › 1964 Ears (The Appreciation Thread)