EDIT: I didn't realise there were three pages of this thread when posting and have only read the first - apologies if I have just repeated something already said on the thread below!
Quote:
I am pretty sure that i would not catch/hear these bass notes with another headphones which is not bass heavy ,because these notes are too subtle too notice. without the denons i would probably never have noticed those notes.
Then I would hazzard a geuss that the producer did not intend you to be focusing on those notes; they were supposed to be subtle and in the background and the Denon's exagerrated bass made them a central part of the track.
Those headphones you mention are producing those deep bass notes - just do a test online - they are just playing them back at less volume than your Denons so they are less obvious.
There is a lot of stuff in a recording mix that you are not first-hand aware of, but you would certainly notice something was "wrong" with the recording if you heard it again with those elements taken out.
I used to have some CX300 and I could really clearly hear Tom Waits humming along to the first couple of bars of a lot of the songs of Small Change before starting to sing. It was more of a deep growl than a hum and I hadn't noticed it before.
So does this make the CX300 better than my K702 because I have to strain with the K702 to hear than hum?
Of course not. The CX300 is a bass-farting mess of an IEM, an element which was supposed to be subtle and in the background was brought up the front of the recording, where it was never supposed to be.
Edited by EddieE - 9/28/10 at 8:57am