Exactly - so they are the same drivers (diaphragm and magnet) - tuned by the addition of felt damping, mesh covers etc... all of which are attached to the driver at the factory to adjust it.
In purely electrical terms they are the same driver, and will respond to amplification identically.
You can buy drivers from focal or JBL and put them in all sorts of different housings - with different damping inside the speaker housing and your end result will sound quite different - but the drivers themselves - the speakers - would be identical - and the driving requirements would also be identical (well within limits - different box designs and damping may affect the overall efficiency so an inefficient design would require a bit more power to drive...)
Hope my analogy is making sense....
But the point is - an amp that drives DT990's well will drive DT880's well - whether the sonic signature of the amp matches well with each of the headphones is a completely different question.... objective vs subjective
I have been trying 4 different amplification options with my Revox/Beyers all of which are driving them well
There is no lack of volume / detail - but noticeable difference in soundstage, air.
The most surprising one is the adapter connected to my receivers speaker outs..... cheap and very very effective - but I never liked the signature of my receivers power amps - which is why I run my speakers through a seperate power amp. (I have yet to test the power amp through the HP's)
The 4 options I have are (in current preference order):
Matrix M-Stage
Firestone Cute Curve with Creek OBH2 PSU
Onkyo TX-SR876 HP Jack (onboard amp)
Onkyo TX-SR876 with ART Headtap adapter (via speaker outs)
The Onkyo - either through the HP Jack or via the Headtap adapter is on a par with the Cute Curve.... the M-Stage is better - but the difference is not enormous