Choosing between AKG 701, DT 880, AD900's and AH-D2000's

The AD900 would be the easiest to drive since they don't need an amp. They will improve some with one though. DT880 and K701 will need an amp and the AD900 will sound superior than either without one.  Adding a good desktop amp into the equation will make the DT880 and K701 sound  better than the AD900 overall but if you want something that will sound good right away and not even have to worry about spending more in the future, the AD900 would be the best option.

The D2000 will most likely sound worse than all 3 due to being closed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by munchiselleh 

So I should for sure go with the AD900 in this case? Even if I can get the Denon's for 205 dollars from amazon and then use a relatively cheap amp to drive them?

Well If choosing between open and closed phones, Id almost always go with open ones. Only get the D2000 if you need isolation or want a bassy headphone.  The DT880 and K701 with a good desktop amp will sound better than the AD900 with one so its up to you if you want to deal with worse sound now for better sound in the long run. THe AD900 could potentially save you a couple hundred in the long run if you decide not to add an amp in the future.

Never, ever, use the K701 without an amp. I've tried it for myself and guess where it ended? (See signature)

The AD900 absolutely does not need an amp, while I'm not to sure about the DT880 32ohm. Some have said they still benefit greatly from an amp, yes, even the 32ohm edition.

Be sure if you decide on the AD900 though, you know what you are getting into. 10-15% improvement for nearly $200 more than the AD700. Don't get me wrong, it's probably a fabulous headphone, and many have loved it dearly, but if you want to save a bit of money the AD700 is almost all the AD900 is. AD900 is still an improvement though, but the margin is not as big as most would think.

I cannot tell you verbatim the exact differences between the two, but I can tell you the basics. Hopefully someone can chime in a bit.

DT880 = More Neutral

DT990 = DT880 + More bass.

DT990 has more bass than the DT880 which some likely prefer, but some don't like. DT880 is definitely a more popular headphone though.

Search some of the thread around here, as many have "DT880 vs DT990" things going, and they can better explain the differences than I can.

All versions of the DT880 and DT990 really need an amp, even the 32 ohm from what I have read.  DT990 is less balanced than the DT880. It has boosted bass and treble with a recessed midrange. Soundstage is smaller as well.  DT880 has a much more balanced sound and a better soundstage.

Currently own both the DT880 and K702, i can tell you the dt880 is superior in every way. K702 has a piercing high and very bass light even driven with an amp, so if you prefer more bass i don't think K702 is for you. DT880 though really stands out in my collection, everything just crisp and and the bass is amazing in quality and quantity. Don't know about the DT990 but if you prefer balance sound throughout the spectrum, get the DT880. 

I recently purchased and ATH-AD900s. Currently running them through my sound card alone and they sound brilliant. Could only imagine they'll sound even better once i get my new dac and amp. They get a recommendation from me :)

ad900s if you like indie and acoustic. If you've got a good amp (a really good amp), the k702s will run circles around the ad900s, but you need synergy for that to happen. Unless it's the 600ohm version, I wouldn't recommend the dt880s.

From what i've read, beyers under 600 ohm aren't the best purchases.

They don't sound very good in comparison and aren't that much cheaper than the 600 ohm. 

I'd say go with the AD900 or D2000. 

If it were between the AD900 and the D2000 i'd go with the D2000 for it's modding capabilities.