Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Am I crazy (part question)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Am I crazy (part question)

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 

The pictured ALPS rk40 is a stereo pot NOT balanced correct?IMAG0117.jpg


Edited by stew1234 - 9/7/10 at 5:13pm
post #2 of 11
Thread Starter 

To clarify what is the difference between a balance pot and a stereo pot if they both only have 2 decks? 

post #3 of 11

A balance pot has 4 decks.

post #4 of 11

The heck? Okay, what you're saying makes no sense to me, so I'm going to go off on a limb here and make some wild guesses. Rein me in if this makes no sense.

 

I think that you may be thinking about balanced vs. shared-ground drive. If so, know that this should be irrelevant to potentiometers. A stereo potentiometer controls two potentiometers such that they have identical values (within tolerance) for a given setting of the control. The two are discrete and not linked in any way unless you make a connection between the contacts yourself. It is possible that one or more of the potentiometer contacts will be wired to ground - this is irrelevant to the operation of the potentiometer itself. In a balanced scenario, you would simply wire the contact designated for the left channel to left ground and that for the right channel to right ground, instead of both to a shared circuit ground. The pot itself doesn't know or care what you're connecting it to.

 

If you mean balance in the way of variable L/R volume amplitude, these can effectively use a normal i.e. non-stereo pot. You have some normalized value which you can spill back and forth between two poles, which is exactly what a standard (two poles plus center tap) potentiometer does.


Edited by gimble - 9/7/10 at 5:49pm
post #5 of 11

A balance pot has 2 decks, a balanced pot has 4 decks :)

 

 

Of course, a balanced balance pot has 4 decks, but I haven't really seen any of those.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwmclean View Post

A balance pot has 4 decks.

 

Gimble: a balanced amp requires a 4 deck pot unless you're using two 2 deck pots.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by gimble View Post

The heck? Okay, what you're saying makes no sense to me, so I'm going to go off on a limb here and make some wild guesses. Rein me in if this makes no sense.

 

I think that you may be thinking about balanced vs. shared-ground drive. If so, know that this should be irrelevant to potentiometers. A stereo potentiometer controls two potentiometers such that they have identical values (within tolerance) for a given setting of the control. The two are discrete and not linked in any way unless you make a connection between the contacts yourself. It is possible that one or more of the potentiometer contacts will be wired to ground - this is irrelevant to the operation of the potentiometer itself. In a balanced scenario, you would simply wire the contact designated for the left channel to left ground and that for the right channel to right ground, instead of both to a shared circuit ground. The pot itself doesn't know or care what you're connecting it to.

 

If you mean balance in the way of variable L/R volume amplitude, these can effectively use a normal i.e. non-stereo pot. You have some normalized value which you can spill back and forth between two poles, which is exactly what a standard (two poles plus center tap) potentiometer does.


Edited by Nebby - 9/7/10 at 5:55pm
post #6 of 11

Yeah, you'd have to be a bit clever to do a balanced balance pot.

 

Well, not that clever. You use a stereo pot again, you just hook it up differently.

post #7 of 11

Like Nebby pointed out, a balance pot is for controlling left to right balance.

For stereo, it is typically a 2 deck pot with a linear impedance taper.

A balance (linear taper) pot makes a weird volume control and vice versa. Volume pots are audio (log) taper 

The pot pictured may very well be a balance pot, Alps made linear pots for stereo balance application.

It is obviously not balanced (4 deck audio taper) though.


Edited by bada bing - 9/7/10 at 7:53pm
post #8 of 11

You can use a 2-deck pot to attenuate a stereo balanced signal.

I guess an alternate way of saying this is that you can use a 1-deck pot to attenuate a single balanced signal.

 

Ignoring the obvious benefits to availability & cost there are a couple ways to argue that its preferable to a 4-deck pot. Perhaps the largest is that there are no readily available pots (not steppers!) that guarantee the matching of any 2 decks to better than 1db. 

 

see dsavitsk's post here

 

You could also use a 2-deck balance pot as a balanced balance pot using mostly the same method.


Edited by nikongod - 9/7/10 at 6:22pm
post #9 of 11

That matching issue sounds like a job for some transistors...

post #10 of 11
Thread Starter 

My confusion was I misread the part description. Instead of balance pot I was thinking balanceD pot all along - so when a 2 gang pot arrived I wasn't sure why.

 

So clearly a balance pot would in no way be acceptable for use as a stereo volume pot. 


Edited by stew1234 - 9/8/10 at 2:04pm
post #11 of 11

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by stew1234 View Post

So clearly a balance pot would in no way be acceptable for sure as a stereo volume pot. 


This is correct.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Am I crazy (part question)