Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
Sennheiser HD-598s are the most comfortable headphones I've had the opportunity to use. I recommend these wholeheartedly for any first-time hi-fi buyer because of their excellent soundstage and...
-
I just received my SigPros (bought from a fellow head-fi'er), and now have several hours with them. They are great headphones. Agree with most of what everyone's saying about them. These...
-
Beats out the Bose Triport, the HD 202 and HD 435s, the AT M35 and AT M50. Just try it and see. Extremely comfortable (I wear mine while commuting and studying, for about 5+ hours a day). Bought...
-
I never thought it was possible for such rich sound from a headphone. Simply amazing headphones.
-
When I first put them on on I though that the highs will blow my head off. My ears got tired after 10 - 15 minutes. I though I would throw them out of the window. But having read some good...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Am I crazy (part question)
- stew1234
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 199 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Select All Posts By This User
To clarify what is the difference between a balance pot and a stereo pot if they both only have 2 decks?
- johnwmclean
- Trader Feedback: +2
-
- offline
- 2,589 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Location: Blue Mountains Australia.
- Select All Posts By This User
A balance pot has 4 decks.
The heck? Okay, what you're saying makes no sense to me, so I'm going to go off on a limb here and make some wild guesses. Rein me in if this makes no sense.
I think that you may be thinking about balanced vs. shared-ground drive. If so, know that this should be irrelevant to potentiometers. A stereo potentiometer controls two potentiometers such that they have identical values (within tolerance) for a given setting of the control. The two are discrete and not linked in any way unless you make a connection between the contacts yourself. It is possible that one or more of the potentiometer contacts will be wired to ground - this is irrelevant to the operation of the potentiometer itself. In a balanced scenario, you would simply wire the contact designated for the left channel to left ground and that for the right channel to right ground, instead of both to a shared circuit ground. The pot itself doesn't know or care what you're connecting it to.
If you mean balance in the way of variable L/R volume amplitude, these can effectively use a normal i.e. non-stereo pot. You have some normalized value which you can spill back and forth between two poles, which is exactly what a standard (two poles plus center tap) potentiometer does.
Edited by gimble - 9/7/10 at 5:49pm
A balance pot has 2 decks, a balanced pot has 4 decks :)
Of course, a balanced balance pot has 4 decks, but I haven't really seen any of those.
Gimble: a balanced amp requires a 4 deck pot unless you're using two 2 deck pots.
Quote:

The heck? Okay, what you're saying makes no sense to me, so I'm going to go off on a limb here and make some wild guesses. Rein me in if this makes no sense.
I think that you may be thinking about balanced vs. shared-ground drive. If so, know that this should be irrelevant to potentiometers. A stereo potentiometer controls two potentiometers such that they have identical values (within tolerance) for a given setting of the control. The two are discrete and not linked in any way unless you make a connection between the contacts yourself. It is possible that one or more of the potentiometer contacts will be wired to ground - this is irrelevant to the operation of the potentiometer itself. In a balanced scenario, you would simply wire the contact designated for the left channel to left ground and that for the right channel to right ground, instead of both to a shared circuit ground. The pot itself doesn't know or care what you're connecting it to.
If you mean balance in the way of variable L/R volume amplitude, these can effectively use a normal i.e. non-stereo pot. You have some normalized value which you can spill back and forth between two poles, which is exactly what a standard (two poles plus center tap) potentiometer does.
Edited by Nebby - 9/7/10 at 5:55pm
Yeah, you'd have to be a bit clever to do a balanced balance pot.
Well, not that clever. You use a stereo pot again, you just hook it up differently.
- bada bing
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- online
- 357 Posts. Joined 11/2007
- Location: Land of the midnight sun
- Select All Posts By This User
Like Nebby pointed out, a balance pot is for controlling left to right balance.
For stereo, it is typically a 2 deck pot with a linear impedance taper.
A balance (linear taper) pot makes a weird volume control and vice versa. Volume pots are audio (log) taper
The pot pictured may very well be a balance pot, Alps made linear pots for stereo balance application.
It is obviously not balanced (4 deck audio taper) though.
Edited by bada bing - 9/7/10 at 7:53pm
- nikongod
- Trader Feedback: +8
- DIY-ku
-
- offline
- 8,271 Posts. Joined 1/2005
- Location: northern NJ
- Select All Posts By This User
You can use a 2-deck pot to attenuate a stereo balanced signal.
I guess an alternate way of saying this is that you can use a 1-deck pot to attenuate a single balanced signal.
Ignoring the obvious benefits to availability & cost there are a couple ways to argue that its preferable to a 4-deck pot. Perhaps the largest is that there are no readily available pots (not steppers!) that guarantee the matching of any 2 decks to better than 1db.
You could also use a 2-deck balance pot as a balanced balance pot using mostly the same method.
Edited by nikongod - 9/7/10 at 6:22pm
That matching issue sounds like a job for some transistors...
- stew1234
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 199 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: San Francisco, CA
- Select All Posts By This User
My confusion was I misread the part description. Instead of balance pot I was thinking balanceD pot all along - so when a 2 gang pot arrived I wasn't sure why.
So clearly a balance pot would in no way be acceptable for use as a stereo volume pot.
Edited by stew1234 - 9/8/10 at 2:04pm
- nikongod
- Trader Feedback: +8
- DIY-ku
-
- offline
- 8,271 Posts. Joined 1/2005
- Location: northern NJ
- Select All Posts By This User
This is correct.
- Am I crazy (part question)
Recent Discussions
- › Musical fidelity M1 HPA vs other (< $900) Amps 1 minute ago
- › The discovery thread. NEW!! The JVC HA-FX40. Page 83...JVC... 2 minutes ago
- › [WTB] Sennheiser IE8 / IE80 3 minutes ago
- › R'n'B / soul recommendations, new and old 3 minutes ago
- › [REVIEW] Audiofly AF78 Hybrid IEM: A Very Brave Proposition 4 minutes ago
- › cheap/DIY 50W amp? 5 minutes ago
- › The Deals Thread 5 minutes ago
- › Long awaited Smyth SVS Realiser NOW AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE 6 minutes ago
- › Alternative to beats by dre 6 minutes ago
- › FS: Sony MDR-R10 [EU] 9 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Sennheiser HD-598 by TK277
- › Ultrasone Signature Pro Headphones by baglunch
- › JVC HA-S600 by pootispow
- › Audez'e LCD-2 Planar Magnetic Headphones by Squuiid
- › Superlux HD-668 B by BlackTea
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





