Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Audeze LCD-2 Impressions Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Audeze LCD-2 Impressions Thread - Page 274

post #4096 of 4105

Just posting a photo

 

Audeze LCD2 with Fazor

post #4097 of 4105
Enjoy !!
cool.gif
post #4098 of 4105

I recently got confirmation on something that I have mentioned on head-fi before, but people didn't seem to believe.  We all know that the new LCD2.2F models have an impedance of 70 ohms, but before that many people assumed that they were 50 ohms.  I know that all of the reviews out on the web, such as the 6 moons review, state that their LCD2 were 50 ohm, but I recently asked Audeze about my own LCD2 that has had the serial number sticker removed.  Without the serial number I would have had to send it in to determine if mine was a rev 1 or a rev 2.  My pair of LCD2 measure at 60 ohms and when I mentioned this to Audeze they confirmed that LCD2 rev 1 measure at 45 ~ 50 ohms, rev 2 measure at 60 ohms, and the fazor models measure at 70 ohms.  If you are ever unsure of what model you have, just check the resistance and you can get your answer if you have a multimeter lying around.

 

I know it seems pretty random for me to post this here, but I really couldn't find this information anywhere on head-fi or anywhere else.  I just thought the information needs to be out there.

post #4099 of 4105

Cool. It does not matter much, if at all, but amps perform better into higher impedance loads in some ways so increasing it is a good thing.

post #4100 of 4105
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMiddleSky View Post
 

Just got loan LCD 2F for a week. It's definitely improvement compare to LCD2rev3 with bigger imaging and slight cleaner presentation while still remain thick, smooth and no harsh or sibilant at all. This headphone is even more forgiving compare to Oppo PM-1.

 

 

Though when I compare it to LCD-X the gap is still there, and it's very easy to pick the winner. The price gap says it clearly after all.

 

Yep, summarizes my thoughts exactly.  I am new here and started a thread in the "Help" section comparing the freq charts (I really don't know how to read them, but comparing the 2Fs to the rev3 Non-Fs there was a noticeable difference on the charts).  The actual audio difference was quite apparent to me and exactly as you described.  I also had both versions side-by-side to immediately compare the differences. 

post #4101 of 4105
Different strokes for different folks.I had the X for a couple weeks,tried to like it,but found it to bright.My ears enjoy the LCD-2F more, but I suspect I am in the minority.smily_headphones1.gif
post #4102 of 4105
Quote:
Originally Posted by dfarina View Post

Different strokes for different folks.I had the X for a couple weeks,tried to like it,but found it to bright.My ears enjoy the LCD-2F more, but I suspect I am in the minority.smily_headphones1.gif

Well, I agree with you. My LCD2 non-fazors were too confined but the LCD2s with fazors really opened up the sound stage and seemed to add a more 3D quality.
post #4103 of 4105
I seem to remember that Audeze confirmed (in a conversation with Tyll?) that they have also been evolving / improving the driver materials on the LCD-2 along with adding the Fazor. This, combined with the more cohesive sound wave from the Fazor, would make a big difference.

What I prefer about the XC over the 2 is the speed of the drivers. The texture of the music is just so realistic and I can distinguish much more detail with the XC. Guitar string vibrations are heard clearer. Cymbal hits decay better. Drums beat more naturally. Piano is just so real.

In the end I really like what the lighter and faster drivers of XC do to the sound to bring it closer to feeling real. This is what I feel is part of the bigger sound change to the LCD-2F. I'm not saying they have the same material / driver as the XC, because they do not. I'm saying that they have been improving the drivers with each iteration including the Fazor version which may be the biggest improvement to the SQ.
post #4104 of 4105

Modern LCD-2 still seem like a better value to me from all their lineup. I haven't heard LCD-X, but I couldn't hear much difference between LCD-2 and LCD-3.

post #4105 of 4105
Quote:
Originally Posted by x RELIC x View Post

I seem to remember that Audeze confirmed (in a conversation with Tyll?) that they have also been evolving / improving the driver materials on the LCD-2 along with adding the Fazor. This, combined with the more cohesive sound wave from the Fazor, would make a big difference.

In the end I really like what the lighter and faster drivers of XC do to the sound to bring it closer to feeling real. This is what I feel is part of the bigger sound change to the LCD-2F. I'm not saying they have the same material / driver as the XC, because they do not. I'm saying that they have been improving the drivers with each iteration including the Fazor version which may be the biggest improvement to the SQ.

The conversation was with yours truly ;). The material change should made no difference in sound quality, and is probably used on all drivers now. I did not confirm that, but it would only make sense in context. The only thing that should change is how the drivers wear down over time, but it carries all of the same characteristics for sound reproduction. The thinner drivers in the X and XC are some of the best drivers on the market. The 2 and X are my favorites in the lineup. The 2F is a nice in-between.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Audeze LCD-2 Impressions Thread