The USB chip inside this DAC is a Tenor TE7022L which only supports 8/16/32/44.1/48/96 KHz sampling rates. So they can't support 88.2KHz, I guess.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
Sennheiser HD-598s are the most comfortable headphones I've had the opportunity to use. I recommend these wholeheartedly for any first-time hi-fi buyer because of their excellent soundstage and...
-
I just received my SigPros (bought from a fellow head-fi'er), and now have several hours with them. They are great headphones. Agree with most of what everyone's saying about them. These...
-
Beats out the Bose Triport, the HD 202 and HD 435s, the AT M35 and AT M50. Just try it and see. Extremely comfortable (I wear mine while commuting and studying, for about 5+ hours a day). Bought...
-
I never thought it was possible for such rich sound from a headphone. Simply amazing headphones.
-
When I first put them on on I though that the highs will blow my head off. My ears got tired after 10 - 15 minutes. I though I would throw them out of the window. But having read some good...
Head-Fi Sponsors
New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder - Page 3
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
I am not a very technical person, enclosed is a picture showing the TE7022L towards the left of the picture and a PCM1792 towards the bottom Center of the picture. David Gao would have to explain what each does.
- LeonardS
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 37 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User
Rocksteady65,
OOPS, my bad. PCM1794 not PCM1704 in the new SMK-III (obviously from the photo above).
Still, it is BB vs Cirrus, premium chipsets from both manufactures inside the DMK MK-IV and the newer SMK-III. It would be nice to have a head to head review, but maybe I'm wrong that mrarroyo still has the DMK MK-IV in his possession. Silly me.
I have my DMK MK-IV, and I do really like its DAC (that headamp is. .good, just not great). If the SMK-III improves on the already stellar DAC and also improves the headamp...at this pricepoint, it might be hard to beat.
Hi all,
can anybody compare SMK-III and DMK-IV with Audio-gd Fun, in terms of sonic performance?
I want primarily a very good DAC with remote control. But I would not mind if it included a good head-amp too. :-) Can you recommend any device of this kind?
Thanks.
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User

Rocksteady65,
OOPS, my bad. PCM1794 not PCM1704 in the new SMK-III (obviously from the photo above).
Still, it is BB vs Cirrus, premium chipsets from both manufactures inside the DMK MK-IV and the newer SMK-III. It would be nice to have a head to head review, but maybe I'm wrong that mrarroyo still has the DMK MK-IV in his possession. Silly me.
I have my DMK MK-IV, and I do really like its DAC (that headamp is. .good, just not great). If the SMK-III improves on the already stellar DAC and also improves the headamp...at this pricepoint, it might be hard to beat.
I do have the DMK-IV as well as the SMK-III and I do plan to compare them. However the SMK-III is about to be sent to Skylab and immtbiker so it will take about a month for the comparison. However the good thing is that two other seasoned members will be able to add their impressions and thus provide two additional perspectives.
LeonardS I too enjoy the DAC section of the DMK-IV a lot and I use it just about every day in the office rig. Cheers.
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
Ok, both the SMK-III and the TAMP-20 have been shipped to Skylab who will then forward them to immtbiker. Look forward to reading their impressions in the next month or so. Cheers!
- stang
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,870 Posts. Joined 6/2009
- Location: Melbourne, Australia.
- Select All Posts By This User
Great to hear. I love the T-Amp 20 except for a couple of things. The volume knob looks and feels a bit too cheap and when I get past 1 o clock, there is a lot of friction when turning the volume knob. Nevertheless the K1000 still sound great out of it and for the price it's a fantastic piece of kit 
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
You like listening at very loud volumes, I do not recall going past 10 o'clock or so.
I believe you can unscrew the knob's holding screw and pull the knob 1/8" or 1/16" out and re-tighten the knob. This should help with the tightness you feel.
- Skylab
- Trader Feedback: +41
- Reviewerus Prolificus
-
- offline
- 19,583 Posts. Joined 4/2005
- Location: Chicagoland
- Select All Posts By This User
Miguel was nice enough to loan me the HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder. I used it with my Hifiman HE-5LE, Beyer T1, and Audio Technica W1000X headphones, and auditioned it both from the headphone jack .
Miguel has described the unit well, so I won’t go into any of that. One slight operational quirk – there is a button to engage the headphone jack, but I found that just plugging headphones in engaged it, although that did not light the LED. Turning the HP button “on” then caused the headphones to turn off. Odd. There is a relay in there I can hear physically switching. If the SMK-III is actually turning the whole headphone section off when not in use, that’s pretty cool.
I reviewed an earlier HLLY DAC + Headphone amp combo unit, the DMK IV, and while I found the DAC to be quite good, I was less than impressed with the headphone jack. With the stock op-amps, which is how I asked Miguel to send it to me, I was again not thrilled by the headphone out’s performance. It was certainly decent, and on par with what I got from the (very similar looking) Music Hall 25.2 DAC’s built in headphone amp. I no longer have the older HLLY DMK-IV to compare it to.
Miguel reports that switching to the AD8620 improves the headphone performance, and I see no reason to doubt that. As it was, the sound was essentially neutral, but lacking a little in transparency, and nuance. I found this to basically be true with all of the headphones I tried – I used the W1000X to give the SMK-III something easy to drive, but the basic character remained, which I am now guessing is just the character of the stock op-amps.
I tried the DAC line-level outs first with the HLLY T-Amp 20 driving the HE-5LE, and this sounded a little better than the SMK-III’s headphone out, I felt. It was more dynamic, and more extended on top. So that was good news.
Then I went to the SMK-III’s DAC line outs into the Woo Audio WA-2, driving the HE-5LE (and then the T1) with that. WOW. The performance, as you would expect, was MUCH better. The SMK-III as a DAC is something to really get excited about. I found the sound clear, transparent, extended and dynamic. The deep bass from Goldfrapp’s “Dreaming”, from her new “Head First” record, was VERY deep, tight, and punchy. Her vocals were also very cleanly reproduced, with no hint of artificial edge or sibilance – very natural sounding. I found the DAC performance to be on par with the Yulong D100, which I thought highly enough of to buy the review loaner I was sent. The Yulong’s headphone out performance is better, though, at least with the HLLY’s stock op-amps.
So as a DAC, and at the asking price of $320, I’d say the HLLY seems like a very attractively priced product.
- mrarroyo
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 19,113 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Location: Miami Beach, Florida U.S.A.
- Select All Posts By This User
Rob, I apologize about not describing the switch in the front. With the light on the headphone amp is on and the dac out is off, then with the light off the headphone amp is on as well as the dac out. I believe there is a third way in which the light is off and where the internal amp is off and only the dac out is on.
I did try three other op-amps besides the stock one, these were the LM4562, AD8397, and AD8620. As you wrote the AD8620 was my favorite and IMO the difference was easy to hear. Currently I am waiting for a pair of AD797BR with single to dual adapter to arrive and try plus I want to also try an AD8066 I have. Cheers and thanks for trying the unit.
- clou91
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 351 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Location: UBC
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks for the impressions both mrarroyo and skylab. I'm temped to order one of these, but I don't want to jump the gun too quick. Do either of you know how this compares to a similarly priced Audio GD product? I need a good DAC to pair with my Dynalo
I am looking for a very good DAC / preamp with remote control. And I would not mind if it was a good head-amp too. :-)
The best one would be probably something with appearance and features of Hlly DMK-IV and sound quality of SMK-III.
Recently David mentioned that they were going to introduce a new version of DMK-IV in several months. I would be happy if it had the best from both of these.
Or can anybody recommend another good DAC / preamp with remote control?
Thanks.
Edited by blok - 9/30/10 at 1:49pm
- LeonardS
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 37 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User
mrarroyo,
Did you have to adjust down the voltage in the SMK-III in order to use the AD8620 and AD8397? I have the DMK-IV and noticed in the schematic posted by David-gao that the supply voltage is +/- 15 vdc. The AD chips mentioned use a bit lower voltage. Is the voltage lower on the SMK-III, in order to allow the op-amp rolling? Or is it easily adjusted?
- david-gao
- Trader Feedback: 0
- MOT: Hlly Audio
-
- offline
- 107 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: China
- Select All Posts By This User
No new informations?
- LeonardS
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 37 Posts. Joined 8/2010
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User
David,
Perhaps you could answer the question: Do you need to adjust the power supply voltage in order to change op-amps in the SMK-III?
- New HLLY SMK-III Digital Audio Decoder
Recent Discussions
- › TTVJ amp/dac for sale 18 seconds ago
- › Eastern Electric Minimax DAC + Mullard NOS tube 57 seconds ago
- › Headphone/Amp impedance matching: Basics you need to Know 1 minute ago
- › Hifiman HE-6 vs Audeze LCD-3 2 minutes ago
- › Scosche IEM856M Reference In-Ear Monitors sometimes $14.99 on... 2 minutes ago
- › Ultra portable setup with full size Headphones.....? 3 minutes ago
- › Open backed Denon 5000's 3 minutes ago
- › Does physical damage affect the sound quality of a port headphone amp? 4 minutes ago
- › Lets Talk Metal 4 minutes ago
- › AKG Q701 Quincy Jones Edition is killed? 6 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Sennheiser HD-598 by TK277
- › Ultrasone Signature Pro Headphones by baglunch
- › JVC HA-S600 by pootispow
- › Audez'e LCD-2 Planar Magnetic Headphones by Squuiid
- › Superlux HD-668 B by BlackTea
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




