Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Bang & Olufsen, good or bad????
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bang & Olufsen, good or bad???? - Page 2

post #16 of 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnwmclean View Post

Mutton dressed as lamb.



I prefer mutton to lamb, so please don't get in the meat argument.

post #17 of 19

their mp3 players sounded good to me.

post #18 of 19

Honestly, I would furnish my room with B&O products because they're so friggin' sexy. I personally think the BeoSound 5 is my dream source.

post #19 of 19

Short form review of B&O.... sound quality equivalent to components of similar functionality costing 20-30% less

 

Company which invests hugely in R&D as well as design (justifying the cost?)

 

Over the years:

Linear tracking turntables with world leading cartridges

Developed Dolby HXpro and had top notch cassette decks

 

B&O afficionados could go on...

 

I still prefer Quad electrostatics - but I have heard very good things from B&O speakers - and have a pair in my study.

 

For a fully integrated system they are hard to beat

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Bang & Olufsen, good or bad????