Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › *' –.– '* Help: Is there a "higher quality" AKG K701? *' –.– '*
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

*' –.– '* Help: Is there a "higher quality" AKG K701? *' –.– '* - Page 2

post #16 of 155

I would strongly recommend either the AKG K280 parabolic or K340 Electrostatic-dynamic headphones. All the detail of the K702s but with more 'meat' to the sound. The K280s can out sound stage the K702s with their four drivers and the K340 has a similar depth to the sound. Some K340s are described as bass heavy and others are not. I would say mine are not. Both are available on ebay, often in very good if not NOS condition for £20-£50 for the K280 and £60-£150 for the K340s.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #17 of 155

Keep your K701, and wait AKG announce their new flagship.

post #18 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prog Rock Man View Post

I would strongly recommend either the AKG K280 parabolic or K340 Electrostatic-dynamic headphones. All the detail of the K702s but with more 'meat' to the sound. The K280s can out sound stage the K702s with their four drivers and the K340 has a similar depth to the sound. Some K340s are described as bass heavy and others are not. I would say mine are not. Both are available on ebay, often in very good if not NOS condition for £20-£50 for the K280 and £60-£150 for the K340s.



I don't know mate, could sonic nirvana be attained under 200 pounds.

 

What are you getting us to do.

post #19 of 155

I also recommend you look into the Audio-Technica AD2000's

 

post #20 of 155

i think i'm gonna stand by my first post.

unless you can step up to high end cans, anything you buy will be a side-grade.

if you like the k702, chances are you'll like it even more with a better source and amp.

 

that is where the money should go for now... 

trust me, they scale up.  big time.

post #21 of 155

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacedonianHero  


"For the money (under $1K), then no. I'd stick with the K701s and try and build up your system (amp/dac/ source/cables....in that order) around them. They ( K70x) do scale quite nicely."


I pretty much agree with one slight alteration:


Amp/source/dac/cables


The AKG K-70x headphones are, IMHO, the best headphone for the price. Especially typical used street prices ($200 or less). So you already have a solid foundation. Since they do scale so well, improving the amp/source/dac (and to some extent cables after you've found the right setup) will nicely improve the performance of the AKG.

post #22 of 155

I prefer this order better...

 

Quote: MacedonianHero 

amp/dac/ source/cables....in that order

post #23 of 155
Thread Starter 

 

 
Regrettably with the source upgrades, I can't because I listen mainly to Vocal Trance when I slip into my headphones.  So it's not like I buy CDs, but rather get random tunes in MP4 format as they come available from different sources.  So I'm kinda stuck with what I have, and compression formats are sadly limited.  Unless there is some "bitchen" MP3 player out there somewhere...  
 
I'd love to try out a K501 - where do I get one?  None on eBay today.
 
As for the Glow/K701 problem, Mike at HeadRoom said they would be fine even at low impedance, because their sensitivity rating made them very hard to drive.  Hope that makes sense to you, 'cause it doesn't to me.  But they seem OK, and I love the sound of the amp.  Any further explanation as to why a different amp would be better than what I already have and like?
 
Otherwise I appreciate all the helpful comments. Already I have a grand value invested in the amp/cans.  I can't justify more even if I'd like to, because of my other commitments.  I'll have to work with what I have, for now.  
 
I could trade/sell the Glow for something else, but it would have to be a vision from God that convinced me to do so for a SS amp!  And as for a tube amp, I"m pretty psyched with the Glow! It's awesome!!  I can't even imagine a better sound if I sat home in a Lotus position for 72 hours and meditated on it!  Those of you who haven't heard it, are missing out!  
post #24 of 155

by source upgrade, we mean that you can purchase an external DAC (digital-to-analog converter) for your PC listening.

it will provide a noticeable improvement over a stock sound card (if that's what you're using).

 

regarding the glow audio.  just so we're clear, there's a difference between "works" and "is optimal."

 

the k701 are some PICKY headphones.

until you've heard them powered by some of the higher end amps, and supplied with a really resolving source, you haven't heard what they are capable of.

 

that's why we're trying to steer you toward an external dac and a nice solid state amp. 

 

or, you can just buy another set of headphones, and not notice any improvement from the K701s.  just different sound. 

 

post #25 of 155

just to reiterate. i'm not bashing your glow amp.

it's that i personally don't feel that tubes are best for the k701s.  especially an OTL tube amp.

 

solid state amps work better with those cans.  to my ears it's quite pronounced.

post #26 of 155

If you're willing to try the closed route, look into ATH-A2000X, will be right up your alley.  It is very efficient, too.

post #27 of 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWuss View Post

just to reiterate. i'm not bashing your glow amp.

it's that i personally don't feel that tubes are best for the k701s.  especially an OTL tube amp.

 

solid state amps work better with those cans.  to my ears it's quite pronounced.

 

You should add that hybrid tube amps also do, report-ably, well with the K701.

But, an OTL amp would have trouble pushing enough wattage into those low impedance cans.


 

post #28 of 155
Thread Starter 

OK, I understand the Glow's limitations with the K701 now.  HeadRoom has a 30-day return policy.  Do you guys think the Micro would be enough to push the K701?  That's the limit to my price range.

 

As for a DAC, the Glow has one on board.  I realize there are better stand-alone ones as well.  I'm assuming I run the Nano through a SendStation Line Out, which I have, through the DAC and into my amp of choice.  Correct?

 

I'm not adverse to closed at all, I like them.  Just remember my main concern which started this whole adventure:  I had an accident which caused my ears to ring, and now they are very sensitive to bass frequencies and loud volume in general.  So in order to listen to headphones, they must be bass-shy and sound good at low volume.  So far, the K701 has fit the bill and I love the sound.  If it could be improved with a different amp, then I found my headphone.  

 

 

I'd be willing to try a diff amp for sure, but I'll keep some healthy skepticism because I simply like the TYPE of sound that comes from the Glow, and I'd be shocked to find that from a SS amp. Not saying it isn't possible!  Just I'd be heartily surprised.

post #29 of 155
Thread Starter 

 

P.S.  I'll check out the AT you keep recommending Mad Max.  But my experience with the upper end AT cans is a very cold, flat sound, which I don't like.  I love the M50 and that's about as far as it went for me with Audio Technica.

post #30 of 155

No love for the K601? From the couple times I have heard it, it is a step in the right direction regarding the anorexic bass issue of the K701 while keeping a similar sound across the mids and highs. 

 

All that and the K601 are less expensive! 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › *' –.– '* Help: Is there a "higher quality" AKG K701? *' –.– '*