Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Need some suggestions on a music player
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Need some suggestions on a music player - Page 3

post #31 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by nycbone View Post
Would you?


Of course. If they player doesn't sound as good as I had hoped, or I don't think it is $400-$800 worth of good I'd sell it.

I have no reason what so ever to defend a product that doesn't satisfy me.

 

Also using the excuse that people can't afford to buy every product to hear it for themselves.

Whilst I respect this statement, you have to accept that you should comment on it's quality until you've listened/seen one yourself.

Reviews can be handy to determine if you think a player is worth trying, but don't love it or hate it until you have.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #32 of 43

Good for you!

 

re: relying on reviews

True - an assessment can really only be performed by the listener. Unfortunately time (for most of us) and $ (for most of us) limits the DAPs we can audition, movies that we can see, etc.

 

Objective reviewers (who have the time - lucky them!) provide an invaluable service. I haven't made a judgement about the HM-801, but I trust dftk's judgement. That's the best I can do.

 

 

 

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hero Kid View Post




Of course. If they player doesn't sound as good as I had hoped, or I don't think it is $400-$800 worth of good I'd sell it.

I have no reason what so ever to defend a product that doesn't satisfy me.

 

Also using the excuse that people can't afford to buy every product to hear it for themselves.

Whilst I respect this statement, you have to accept that you should comment on it's quality until you've listened/seen one yourself.

Reviews can be handy to determine if you think a player is worth trying, but don't love it or hate it until you have.

post #33 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4DThinker View Post

As far as I know, iTunes doesn't recognize anything but iPods.

Only a few of the competitors will play Apple Lossless. files.

 

Your best bet would be to wait a few weeks and check out the new iPods Apple will be announcing. All will meet your requirements and work fine with your new headphones.

that is correct 
 

post #34 of 43

Cowon J3,.............the Anythingbutipod.com review is in the works, and the SQ is fantastic (I own 1).

post #35 of 43

ipod classic 2009 version ,sounds great , i have 4

post #36 of 43

Does different ipod have discernible sound quality? I know classic is biggest so probably has the best amp but are they noticeable?

 

Do you think they sound better than the ipod touch or the nano unamped?

 

I might get myself either a nano or classic when they announce the new line this september.

post #37 of 43

+1 Cowon S9

 

3110093691_aac877c5b1.jpg

post #38 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by j57park View Post

Does different ipod have discernible sound quality? I know classic is biggest so probably has the best amp but are they noticeable?

 

Do you think they sound better than the ipod touch or the nano unamped?

 

I might get myself either a nano or classic when they announce the new line this september.

Newer iPods sound terrible, electronic, and full of distortion and crackling... their EQ is poorly implemented, and only detracts from the SQ. Anything by Cowon, however, sounds fine with a normal EQ and when you do decide to use the EQ, there is simply no other player that can compete with them.
 

post #39 of 43


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenswall View Post



Newer iPods sound terrible, electronic, and full of distortion and crackling... their EQ is poorly implemented, and only detracts from the SQ. Anything by Cowon, however, sounds fine with a normal EQ and when you do decide to use the EQ, there is simply no other player that can compete with them.
 

Are you talking about ipod nanos? because the latest version of ipod classic does not have those problems
 

post #40 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenswall View Post



Anything by Cowon, however, sounds fine with a normal EQ and when you do decide to use the EQ, there is simply no other player that can compete with them.
 

 

really ? That quite a broad statement

The walkman  A & X series have quite a respectable custom EQ and they dont support AAC (standard iTunes downloads)


Edited by paulypaul - 8/17/10 at 4:55pm
post #41 of 43

They do play aac if I remember correctly but not supported officially.

 

Also I don't agree that every single Cowon is amazing. I owned the D2+ and never liked it much. It was a bit better with EQ but they still had their problems to my ears mainly a bass issue.

post #42 of 43

It looks like it may support AAC in video, but not in m4a audio, so that means transcoding iTunes songs (unless there has been a firmware update since the thread below.

 

Heres the thread.

 

http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/447756/cowon-s9-compatible-with-itunes-time-crunch-answer-request-if-not-what-should-i-use


Edited by paulypaul - 8/17/10 at 5:04pm
post #43 of 43

Well that's what you get for buying from the apple store if you did in fact buy from itunes :P

 

I have everything in mp3 or flac so things like that don't come up for me but it does suck about that kind of format however.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Need some suggestions on a music player