Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › hd650 or hd800
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

hd650 or hd800 - Page 19

post #271 of 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP Wild View Post

No, I just didn't like the idea of you calling someone that I respect OCD behind their back.  I think you know what I mean.  No need for emoticons.


We're all (in this forum) a bit OCD I believe :-) I am one, at least. But generally, of respect to people who REALLY have severe problems, one should avoid using such terminology. So better say we're all abnormally interested in earspeakers and are willing to go to extremes to make things work as we like it. And we respect each other for that very reason. 

 

Anyway - LCD should make a non-leather version. I'll be waiting.... 

post #272 of 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP Wild View Post

No, I just didn't like the idea of you calling someone that I respect OCD behind their back.  I think you know what I mean.  No need for emoticons.

 

Oh for God's sake man. I wasn't attacking your "bro". He can floss his toe nails for all I care.

post #273 of 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilavideo View Post

I used to cut socks into ankle warmers and place them around the shiny metal shells on my PS1000.  The socks remained on my PS1000s 24/7, at home and when I took them with me to the gym.  You can call me whatever you like.  I still ended up with a few tiny scratches, picked up by the camera in extreme zoom, and it would aggravate me.

 

Click-click, click-click, click-click, click-click.  

 

(This is me checking the locks.)


Thanks Bill. Damn, I touched the mouse.  

 

 

post #274 of 279

How is OCD derogatory? It's just another way of saying anal-retentive in this context. I would argue that most of us here at Head-fi are at least that:

 

"In the psychology of Freud, the anal stage is said to follow the oral stage of infant/early-childhood development. This is a time when an infant's attention moves from oral stimulation to anal stimulation (usually the bowels but occasionally the bladder), usually synchronous with learning to control their excretory functions, a time of toilet training. Freud theorized that children who experience conflicts during this period of time may develop "anal" personality traits, namely those associated with a child's efforts at excretory control: orderliness, stubbornness, a compulsion for control,[1] as well as a generalized interest in collecting, possessing, and retaining objects.[2]

If these qualities continue into later life, the person is said to be "anal retentive"."

post #275 of 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by grokit View Post

How is OCD derogatory? It's just another way of saying anal-retentive in this context. I would argue that most of us here at Head-fi are at least that:

 

"In the psychology of Freud, the anal stage is said to follow the oral stage of infant/early-childhood development. This is a time when an infant's attention moves from oral stimulation to anal stimulation (usually the bowels but occasionally the bladder), usually synchronous with learning to control their excretory functions, a time of toilet training. Freud theorized that children who experience conflicts during this period of time may develop "anal" personality traits, namely those associated with a child's efforts at excretory control: orderliness, stubbornness, a compulsion for control,[1] as well as a generalized interest in collecting, possessing, and retaining objects.[2]

If these qualities continue into later life, the person is said to be "anal retentive"."

This made me laugh! I just got back from a behavioral science lecture, not sure if I agree with everything Mr. Freud has to say, but either way, I must pass the exams lol... I can only imagine saying to somebody, "do you know your anally retentive"... Though a lot of his theory makes sense, the problem lies in the fact that it is difficult to create such a purely mechanical and lifeless way of analyzing the stages of human development, there is so much more to humanity than logical theoretics, maybe passion or soul, or the human heart that is almost impossible to define... Either way, back to hd650 or hd 800 lol... Cheers, 
 

post #276 of 279
Quote:

 


 

lcd2-sockmod.JPG

 

 

Is that a veiled attempt to get them to sound like Sennheisers?

.
 

post #277 of 279

There's no such thing as a Sennheiser veil

gagaaa+(16).jpg

 

and BTW:

 

3418544381_d43e215839.jpg?v=1239052059&t=1

post #278 of 279

No, it sounds a lot better. k701smile.gif

BTW, is that the k701 on that smiley's head? 

post #279 of 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardilla View Post

There's no such thing as a Sennheiser veil

gagaaa+(16).jpg

 

and BTW:

 

3418544381_d43e215839.jpg?v=1239052059&t=1


Funny. The kid knows his stuff, the other person just cares about "looks"eek.gif.tongue.gif

 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › hd650 or hd800