Recent Images In This Thread
- categoryCablestagged by System, 7/29/10
- productCardas Sennheiser Replacement Cable For HD580, HD600 & HD650tagged by System, 7/29/10
- brandSennheisertagged by System, 7/29/10
- productSennheiser HD 580tagged by System, 7/29/10
- productSennheiser HD 600tagged by System, 7/29/10
- productSennheiser HD 650 Headphonestagged by System, 7/29/10
Related Forum Threads
- HD 525 Repair Help? Last post on 6/1/11 at 9:21pm in Headphones (full-size)
- HD600 vs HD650 - Initial Thoughts Last post on 9/1/11 at 8:18pm in Headphones (full-size)
- Sennheiser HD580 Precision Last post on 6/10/12 at 2:40am in Headphones (full-size)
- HD 650 cable vs HD 600/580 Last post on 7/16/16 at 12:51am in Headphones (full-size)
- Sennheiser HD 580 fix Last post on 4/25/11 at 8:55am in Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
Last edited: 1/3/17
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (Cables & Accessories)Last edited: 11/29/16
- Hi End CablesLast edited: 1/8/12
The TH900 is magical. It's the hot rod of flagship, makes no apologies, and takes no prisoners IF, you wanna take it that far. This phone just begs to be driven, and it just keeps producing. I find...
Budget audiophile brand Brainwavz Audio is back at it, closing out 2016 and kicking off 2017 with a bevy of new earphone offerings. Their timing was just right. Shortly before leaving for an...
Great lil on-ear headphone but a lil bit uncomfortable on ear. Not for someone who loves heavy bass but good for seeking clarity ;) My opinion, my first AKG product. Tried the AKG Y50 but to me,...
In Ears Prophile 8 IEM review January 2017 Intro I had heard of In Ears but did not know too much about them until I see them on the In-Ear stand at the Indulgence show in London...
MrZ's Toneking Musicmaker TingThe review that swayed me to get on-boardhttp://www.head-fi.org/products/musicmaker-ting/reviews/15584The slightly down-line 1/2 price...
Is It Really Worth 'Upgrading' Sennheiser HD 580/600/650 Cables? - Page 9post #121 of 41610/2/10 at 11:14am
Gear mentioned in this thread:post #122 of 41610/2/10 at 11:16ampost #123 of 41610/2/10 at 11:17ampost #124 of 41610/2/10 at 11:42am
Something that is very clear is that threads like this, that primarily involve a debate get lots of pro-cable participation. But threads that start with a bit of science and ask for examples, don't. Why do those who have the ability to hear differences not readily sibmit themselves to hearing and blind testing?post #125 of 41610/2/10 at 5:10pm
Quote:Originally Posted by p a t r i c k
I see that one of the cable manufacturers has participated in the thread.
On this web page:
Several cables are described as being the product of "exhaustive research".
I would like to know what the "exhaustive research" consisted of.
I would also like to know what the results of the "exhaustive research" are.
Research involving vibrations and how they can affect the lower end of the audio spectrum, as well as the improvements to be had when those vibrations are either eliminated, or when the conductors themselves are no longer subject to the said vibrations. We also worked closely with a team of engineers in CA, perfecting our design and calculating out the best distances between conductors, opposing signals, and shielding, to allow for lowest possible capacitance, maximum flexibility, flex strength, and ultimate flex life.post #126 of 41610/2/10 at 6:04pmQuote:
Has this research produced a paper as is normal practice ?
Where can I obtain this paper?
Presumably there is good evidence for your statement that vibrations (presumably mechanical) influence the signal in the cable.
Cables can, of course, be microphonic, but here the flex of the cable is generating electricity and then a signal. If you don't flex the cable then there is generally no problem.
In what way do mechanical vibrations affect the lower end of the spectrum?Quote:We also worked closely with a team of engineers in CA, perfecting our design and calculating out the best distances between conductors, opposing signals, and shielding, to allow for lowest possible capacitance, maximum flexibility, flex strength, and ultimate flex life.
I think that this information is common knowledge for any cable manufacturer.
In what way have you advanced this field?
Looking at the cables at your website it is impossible to reconcile the extraordinarily high prices with what is materially on offer.
If you have conducted research which has advanced the science of cable manufacture then this would be understandable.
Presumably the innovations then included in the cables are patented?
I would like to know the patent numbers for the work you have carried out.post #127 of 41610/2/10 at 6:43pm
I'm sorry, but those papers are classified as of this time. Currently awaiting patent pending status.
As per your other questions:
No it is not common knowledge, as there is nothing "common" about our design. Especially when speaking of conductor placement.
And as per your comment on our pricing: we have some of the lowest priced headphone cables on the market, and as far as quality is concerned they compete with some of the highest priced headphone cables on the market. So I'm not exactly sure what you are referring to, but as our customers often tell us, they are worth every penny, and then some.post #128 of 41610/2/10 at 7:21pmpost #129 of 41610/2/10 at 7:42pm
Everyone is welcome to their own opinions. Your best bet is to try one, and possibly find the answer to your question for yourself.
Was nice talking with you,
Warren Audiopost #130 of 41610/2/10 at 10:48pmQuote:Originally Posted by Rick
Research involving vibrations and how they can affect the lower end of the audio spectrum, as well as the improvements to be had when those vibrations are either eliminated, or when the conductors themselves are no longer subject to the said vibrations. We also worked closely with a team of engineers in CA, perfecting our design and calculating out the best distances between conductors, opposing signals, and shielding, to allow for lowest possible capacitance, maximum flexibility, flex strength, and ultimate flex life.
My guess would be that this research was consulting with the cable/wire manufacturer about what product design they could offer on an efficient basis. Otherwise, I don't really see how a company the size of Warren Audio has anywhere near enough capitol to contract a team of engineers. But I'm all for patents, there are hundreds on such fascinating fields as perpetual motion machines.
post #131 of 41610/2/10 at 11:08pmpost #132 of 41610/3/10 at 2:09ampost #133 of 41610/3/10 at 7:44am
I want to make a cable that is worse than the stock 650 cable. What materials will be terrible, yet electrically safe?
Use Christmas tree light wire. Cut each of the little colored lights off and twist the bare wire together to make a complete circuit. Cover the twists with black electrician's tape for safety. If you wish, just screw a screw into the light socket to complete the circuit and tape the exposed screw for safety purposes. Strip the wire ends, attach the headphone plug ends by twisting the exposed copper wire together or solder with plumber's roll solder purchased at the local plumbing center. Cover all exposed copper again with black electrician's tape for safety. Don't try to cut the wires to make things look pretty. Just take the wire, lumps, glumps and all.
Use of the wrong kind of solder.
No shielding or fancy teflon coatings.
Semi-exposed wire ends with no EMI/RFI rejection from the light connection ends.
Just plain old, cheap azzzzz, thousand mile spooled, coated, stranded pair, copper wire.
And probably the wrong wire gage ta boot.
I don't think it can get any more "terrible" then that.
Edited by beeman458 - 10/3/10 at 8:27ampost #134 of 41610/3/10 at 8:13am
Not meaning to come to Rick's defense but you guys need to get a grip on what it costs to run a viable business and turn a sufficient profit to make it through each and every continuing month. This especially applies to any company catering to niche groups. The point, enough with the; "You charge to much for your cables!", comments. If you think the prices are a rip, don't buy em. If you're not buying em, then you got no dog in the hunt to complain about. The point, if you want to complain about a company's pricing structure, then you at least have to have bought their product. If you haven't bought their product, then you got no room to complain. And if you continue in your whining, you're just another internet bully, hiding behind a computer monitor, trolling for the express purpose of causing others harm; liable.
The prices I see on the web site link, are reasonable prices. And if you don't like those prices, it's real simple, don't buy em and buy Monster headphone cables instead. Oh wait, Monster doesn't make headphone cables unless for their Beats. Or, you can keep using the cables that came with the headphones and be happy until the time arises where they need replacing and then one can choose to go OEM or DIY. And for those who like making cables yourself so much and you think you've game, quit your day job and start a business like all the rest of us small business owners have. Join the party. Charge whatever you like. Charge what you think to be a fair price for your product that will create interest and a sustaining profit and become Warren's competition. And then, you too can pay your monthly household bills out of the profits. Sans doing that, you're just another internet whiner.
Edited by beeman458 - 10/3/10 at 8:32ampost #135 of 41610/3/10 at 8:55am
I wish companies would stop making products that have such glaring and obvious weaknesses which are so easily solved! I mean, if the improvements were so good, indeed worth the cost of entire headphones in-themselves, they could just swing their vastly higher purchasing power and scales of economy, labour cost, R&D, precision machining and tooling, and offer headphones with the best cables already as 'upgraded' models, or their own after-market upgrades.
Are you telling me that they've not thought about this?
Are you telling me it's more efficient for countless "little men" operations to do this that have to charge so much just to make it viable, than for the likes of Sennheiser, who could implement these improvements in such scales as to ameliorate the cost of entry by massively cutting these "viability" costs, thus lowering the barrier to entry thus increasing sales/aftermarket sales whilst maintaining profit margins.
I mean if all these super expensive tweaks amounted to jack, they'd do it.Return Home
- Is It Really Worth 'Upgrading' Sennheiser HD 580/600/650 Cables?
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- Head-Fi Buying Guide (Cables & Accessories)
- › The AKG K7XX Massdrop First Edition Thread 2 minutes ago
- › New VentureCraft SounDroid VANTAM Jazz Master Limited 3 minutes ago
- › Woo Audio WA-8 4 minutes ago
- › Knowledge Zenith (KZ) impressions thread 5 minutes ago
- › Fiio X5 3rd gen || 2x AKM 4490 || Balanced Out || DSD || DXD | DTS... 5 minutes ago
- › Review: 1MORE Triple Driver In-Ear Headphone with In-line... 7 minutes ago
- › DX200 Details, features and specifications 1st page. With WiFi and... 8 minutes ago
- › Classical Contemporary Music Thread 10 minutes ago
- › DAC far quieter than just PC/phone 13 minutes ago
- › Upcoming DAP from xDuoo - the X10! 17 minutes ago
- › Brainwavz M100 IEM Noise Isolating Earphones with Remote &... by suman134
- › Fostex TH 900 by Scott Branham
- › AKG K403 by IkuMiku96
- › InEar ProPhile 8 by FortisFlyer75
- › MusicMaker Ting by Redcarmoose
- › SHOZY Zero IEM by mgunin
- › Empire Ears Zeus by EagleWings
- › Sennheiser HD 600 by snapacap
- › Venture Electronics (VE) Monk+/Monk Plus by spronkey
- › Cayin i5 by glassmonkey
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Travel Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (CanJams)
- › FiiO X3II DAP firmwares with custom themes
- › Flawless Album Suggestions
- › The Audiophile Scene in a Third World Country...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide,...
- › Mad Lust Envy's Headphone Gaming Guide:...
- › Chord Mojo FAQ
- › Head-Fi Logo Gear