Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Most annoying terminology used by audiophile today?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Most annoying terminology used by audiophile today? - Page 7

post #91 of 92
3/1/11 at 12:02pm

"organic" or "analog"

 

All music is synthetic, and all the music we hear is analog, so wtf?

 

Also, looking back at the last two pages, there is absolutely no such thing as the "Sennheiser veil," and I don't really understand the difference between a "fast" or "slow" headphone either. . . . hopefully all headphones play music at the same speed. '-_-

 


Edited by Satellite_6 - 3/1/11 at 12:07pm
Reply
post #92 of 92
3/2/11 at 2:20pm

oh there is such a thing as the 'Sennheiser veil'...when you have three Sennheiser headphones on the same exact setup and two of them have a veil like I experienced....

 

As I've said before, the most annoying is definitely the blatant misuse of 'balanced' or 'neutral' to describe non-balanced sounding headphones. e.g. Both the M50 and K701 are called 'balanced'...what a joke.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Most annoying terminology used by audiophile today?