Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Lavry DA11 vs GD-Audio Reference 9 vs Reference 5 - Recommendations?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lavry DA11 vs GD-Audio Reference 9 vs Reference 5 - Recommendations?

post #1 of 10
7/25/10 at 5:27pm
Thread Starter 

Which one of these would you recommend for classical music? Speaking of the Reference DACs, I'll need the USB version because I'll have to connect the DAC to my laptop. So, the quality of their USB interfaces is also important.

Reply
post #2 of 10
7/26/10 at 2:10am

I would get the Lavry if I had the cash.

Reply
post #3 of 10
7/26/10 at 2:44am
Thread Starter 

Thanks for you reply!

 

Could you please tell me why you prefer DA11?

Reply
post #4 of 10
7/27/10 at 8:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topaze View Post

Which one of these would you recommend for classical music? Speaking of the Reference DACs, I'll need the USB version because I'll have to connect the DAC to my laptop. So, the quality of their USB interfaces is also important.


Ive had the Lavry Da10 and REF5.

If I only wanted a DAC  Id pick the REF5  ( DA10/11 have a headphone amp and preamp function as well as the DAC)

I think the REF 5 has better sound quality- it images better , timbres are more natural (violins actual sound like violins!), images are distinct etc.

The REF 5 has a DSP that makes the USB sound so similar to BNC I cant tell the difference so that saves getting a USB to SPDIF converter.

The REF5 has a better warranty then the DA10/11 and if something goes wrong it has discrete components with a modular design for ease of maintenance. If something blows on the DA10 board be prepared to kiss the unit goodbye.

 

Reply
post #5 of 10
7/27/10 at 9:24pm

I can't comment on the GD - never heard one.

 

I am, however, a very enthusiastic DA11 owner.  I use the USB input exclusively.  The integrated amp is also quite excellent, so it's a good one box solution.  What headphones do you plan to use?  I can almost guarantee that you will not be disappointed with the DA11.  When I bought mine (direct) I had a 30day audition period.

 

BK

Reply
post #6 of 10
7/28/10 at 4:30am
Thread Starter 

Thanks for the suggestions!

 

To BK_856er: I'm going to use ATH-W5000+AT-HA5000.

Reply
post #7 of 10
7/28/10 at 9:01am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topaze View Post

Thanks for the suggestions!

 

To BK_856er: I'm going to use ATH-W5000+AT-HA5000.



One of my favorite combinations is the ATH-AD2000 (lowish impedance, sensitive) directly out of the DA11.  I think most AT would do pretty well, particularly for classical.  I also tried the W1000, and the DA11 drives it no problem, but I don't really care for its signature with my primary genres.

 

BK

Reply
post #8 of 10
7/28/10 at 3:51pm
Thread Starter 

Thanks again. ;)

 

The thing is, right now I'm considering another DAC, namely the Reference 7. I understand it's quite a bit more expensive, but it looks very solid and is described by the manufacturer as a more neutral model (which suits me better because I think that flavors should preferably originate from amps and headphones, not from DACs). I think it will probably outperform the DA11, and should I need to go balanced in the future I won't have to change the DAC. Modular design also helps.

 

I don't think there should be any problem with jitter, but if there is, I'll probably buy the Halide bridge sometime in the future.

 

As for the DA11's built-in amp/preamp, it's a welcome addition, but I don't really need it, so whatever money I'd have to spend on that particular module would be spent for nothing.


Edited by Topaze - 7/28/10 at 4:00pm
Reply
post #9 of 10
7/28/10 at 5:19pm

It's all good - keep us posted!

 

BK

Reply
post #10 of 10
7/28/10 at 6:39pm

 Posted by Topaze View Post

Thanks again. ;)

 

The thing is, right now I'm considering another DAC, namely the Reference 7. Nice choice - why compromise. 

 

I understand it's quite a bit more expensive, but you will save money by avoiding upgrading losses later and also the expense of a HiFace or similar jitter reduction source

 

but it looks very solid and look at all the quality components - amazing value

 

and is described by the manufacturer as a more neutral model (which suits me better because I think that flavors should preferably originate from amps and headphones, not from DACs).  Im with you on that, besides even the neutral REF5 is to me is if anything on the  dark side of tonality 

 

I think it will probably outperform the DA11, you would need to listen to know but it would be a shock if it did not

 

and should I need to go balanced in the future I won't have to change the DAC. yeah

 

Modular design also helps. smart design for reliability-maintenance

 

I don't think there should be any problem with jitter, but if there is, I'll probably buy the Halide bridge sometime in the future. REF5 seems source insensitive to me but the LavryDA10 needs a HiFace and the DA11 is much like the DA10

 

As for the DA11's built-in amp/preamp, it's a welcome addition, but I don't really need it, so whatever money I'd have to spend on that particular module would be spent for nothing. good rationale

 


 


Edited by Nada - 7/28/10 at 6:40pm
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Lavry DA11 vs GD-Audio Reference 9 vs Reference 5 - Recommendations?