Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Panasonic RP-HJE900 Zirconia Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Panasonic RP-HJE900 Zirconia Review

post #1 of 599
Thread Starter 
I cross-posted my review from the ABI forums. The image formatting is a bit messed up on Head-Fi/Huddler, sorry for the inconvenience.

Panasonic RP-HJE900 Zirconia Review

Usually I don’t write reviews about products that have a) been on the market for well over a year and b) that I only got as a loaner from a friend for a month or so. In such cases I usually just can’t hold myself back when a product completely and utterly sucks, or when it’s so absurd, overpriced, yet amusing that it’s worth telling the public about it – at least for (caustic/abusive) comic relief.

The Panasonic RP-HJE900, released in June 2008, however is an underdog in-ear phone that’s so damn good for its current going price of around $120 that I thought I should help it to some more publicity. It’s barely ever mentioned anywhere, and before I got the pair from my friend (who goes by the nick James444 on the forums), I never even heard of it. This is a shame, since it really competes well with the best IEMs out there, no matter what price range. Sure, it might have some tiny flaws, but other phones that cost twice or three times as much might have some much more glaring faults than the HJE900.

Design, Specs

Panasonic didn’t waste any resources on ostentatious, useless packaging with the HJE900 – they come in a simple cardboard box with plastic innards. Well, the golden embossed “Hi-Fidelity for Audiophiles” print is ostentatious/creepy enough, and usually a warning signal for me to run far, far away from a product that uses such slogans… but at least that print doesn’t cost the end user as much as the brushed aluminum cases of the Shure SE530 or Sennheiser IE8.

For accessories there’s only a draw-string pleather pouch and three pairs of single-flange silicon tips. To be honest, I didn’t even try the included tips; I went straight for my trusty Ultimate Ears Super.Fi tips, which always provide the best fit for my ears. They fit perfectly on the nozzle of the HJE900, and I never looked back.

Isolation with those silicon tips is about average. They block out most normal racket, on the street or on a bus – but on the subway they behave like most other non-custom IEMs, or at least ones that aren’t fitted with quality foam tips: they let some noise through, as expected. The HJE900 are vented on the inside (around the nozzle, three holes per earbud), but that doesn’t seem to diminish their isolation values, contrary to some other vented phones, such as the V-Moda Vibe.

Wait, wait, wait… I got so caught up in hard facts that I totally forgot about the whole marketing shtick Panasonic based their propaganda about these phones on: they’re made from – dramatic pause – Zirconia. To quote Panasonic’s press release, “Zirconia is a white crystalline oxide of zirconium dioxide (ZrO2). It is an extremely durable substance which can withstand extreme temperatures and is used as a thermal barrier coating in jet turbine and diesel engines. […] A sound chamber made of Zirconia has less resonance than plastic or aluminum. As a result, the RP-HJE900 in-ear headphones deliver ultra-clear sound reproduction with virtually no distortion. In addition to realistic sound, the durability of Zirconia offers audiophiles a scratchproof, ultra-tough construction for a lifetime of use.

I can’t verify the acoustic properties of the material (and I even thought that ‘Zirconia’ means they’re made from fake diamonds) – but I can say without a doubt that the HJE900 are some of the best, most solidly built IEMs I’ve tried so far – maybe the very best even. Not only the sturdy, shiny, solid shell material, but also the cables are absolutely top notch. As a bonus, the cables are even user replaceable, meaning one doesn’t have to scrap the whole IEMs if the cables break. They’re about as well made as the other ‘best IEM cables ever’, the Sennheiser IE8 cables. All the strain reliefs on the Panasonic cable make sense and are very well engineered, the sleeve material is slick (none of that gross rubbery stuff), durable, and hardly ever tangles. The 3.5mm plug and the Y-splitter look gorgeous in their meticulously brushed aluminum enclosures, and they fulfill their function satisfyingly. The cables also behave well concerning noise transmission, they aren’t very microphonic. One thing to mention is that the cable is rather short, only one meter. For my needs that’s perfect, since I tend to attach my Sansa Clip+ to the hem of my shirt, and any longer cable just tangles needlessly – but of course your mileage may vary. Since the cables are easily replaceable, Panasonic could release them in different lengths, but to the best of my knowledge there’s no alternative to the currently available length. Well, one could always go the DIY route and whip up their own cables – the earbud connectors aren’t proprietary. They’re a widely used standard, found on cellphone AC chargers and such.

Panasonic’s spec sheet suggests the HJE900’s drivers sport an impedance of 26 Ohm and sensitivity of 100dB/mW. In plain English (and tested with my ears) this means that the phones are loud enough to be driven properly by even the wimpiest MP3 player out there, yet they’re well enough behaved as to not hiss. They actually don’t hiss at all, not even the slightest bit, even paired with problematic players. Personally, I’m seriously allergic to background hiss – and the Panas pass this test with flying colors. They do not need an amp in any case, neither my Headstage Arrow nor my Echo AudioFire made them sound any different than they would sound straight out of a decent MP3 player.

One more bureaucratic thing to mention would be that Panasonic brag in their press release about the phones being “designed with the expertise of Technics sound engineers”. That’s nice – so why aren’t the phones released under the Technics brand name? There might be several reasons, but I will never know for sure… While Panasonic certainly stands for quality home audio gear, Technics was always the more professional branch of the brand, most famous for products such as the SL-1200/1210 direct drive turntables, appreciated by DJs everywhere, for almost three decades. I guess the HJE900 just don’t fit into that professional line-up, as blingy as they are – or Panasonic’s marketing people simply don’t want them to fit in there. As far as their sound goes, they sure would fit the heritage of the Technics brand quite well. But in the end it doesn’t matter, their quality speaks for themselves, no matter what brand name got bestowed upon them.


Everything that follows in this chapter is without ifs or buts, I evaluated the HJE900 not according to their price range, but in regards to all the IEMs I’ve heard so far. They don’t have to shy away from any comparison.

In general I would compare the HJE900 to the Sennheiser IE8 when it comes to sound signature, but they got various properties of the JVC FX700 as well – not to mention quite a few similarities with my current full-sized closed headphones of choice, the Ultrasone HFI-780. Despite all those phones mentioned being dynamic driver ones, the HJE900 display attack speeds, punch, and dynamic as found in some of the really fancy balanced-armature-equipped IEMs, such as the EarSonics SM3, Phonak Audéo PFE, and the like. The word that describes the Panas for me the best is: snappy.

Bass on the HJE900 is well balanced, better than on the IE8 or the FX700. It’s got just the right quantity and quality. It is full, rich, and extends deep, yet it doesn’t suffer from any bloat or midbass hump that muddies up the rest of the frequency range. It is not an exaggerated bass, it is a natural bass. Don’t mistake that for anemic, so-called ‘neutral’ phones. The Panas sure do deliver the goods, according to what a human equal-loudness contour might be perceived as ‘just right’. The bass is engaging, makes music appear natural, and provides depth. It is tight and punchy.

The midrange is slightly recessed, as is usually the case with ‘natural’ sounding phones, since that is just how human hearing works – a flat frequency response isn’t perceived as natural. Due to that fact, the HJE900 sound great at even very low volume levels, but some people might find that attribute to become a bit too much when the phones are played at very loud volume levels. Not that I would recommend such health-hazardous tomfoolery… Anyway, detail and precision of the midrange is top notch, up there with the best IEMs money can buy. The HJE’s excellent speed and dynamics help as well, making listening to any style of music an exciting experience. Male and female voices, guitars, saxophones, drums, synthesizers, what have you – everything sounds great – nothing the Panas wouldn’t render properly.

Treble on the HJE900 is generally great as well, but sometimes a bit too much, slightly sibilant. While the treble extends very well up to the limits of human hearing, is always very airy and sparkling, sometimes it might get a bit sharp or harsh. Fret not, that can be easily fixed: The nozzle of the HJE900 is protected by a fine mesh which can be taken off. One can stuff some foam in there, which tames the excessive treble pretty well, making it a more pleasant, less ‘hot’ listening experience. Overall, it is just some separate peaks in the treble response that, when addressed, might be too sharp – yet as a whole the treble is very precise, detailed, and textured. I got used to it pretty well; I can’t say that the HJE’s treble distracts me from enjoying any kind of music in any way.

Soundstage, stereo imaging is really good as well. They have a rather wide, two-dimensional soundstage that sometimes almost seems to extrude into three-dimensional space. In my experience dynamic drivers are always better in that aspect than balanced armatures, but the Panas are even on the nicer side, as far as dynamic drivers go. Single instruments can easily be pinpointed in the surrounding soundscape, there’s no crude ‘three blob’ stereo image, as often found in other phones. I assume the vents around the nozzle of the phones are partially responsible for that: semi-open phones always seem to perform better than fully closed ones.

Overall clarity, punch, speed, detail, precision, instrument separation – check, they’re all there. Not only ‘there’, but at the top end of what is available in dynamic driver IEMs nowadays. Those are some really enjoyable, engaging phones. Almost scary they go for only $120 nowadays.


What can I say? I wish I knew about the Panasonic RP-HJE900 before. It is a shame that some clearly inferior phones get hyped and advertised that much, and the Panas fall through the cracks of the media, reviewers, and customers. I hope enough people actually bought a pair of those phones, so Panasonic feels encouraged enough to continue their research and development, and deliver some more of those (semi-literal) gems.

Other companies should take note on how excellent build quality can be in that price range, and that there is no excuse to sell something as inferiorly built as, say, the Shure SE530 for a much higher price. Even more extreme, the build quality (or at least the look and feel) of the EarSonics SM3 or Hifiman RE252 is nothing short of pathetic in comparison – but they can of course be excused, being some almost-one-man outlets – and not multinational corporations like Panasonic, who obviously can whip up batches of fancy Zirconia like it was ordinary plastic.

As for sound quality, Panasonic pretty much got it nailed with these IEMs – for my taste and my ears at least. They could make some small improvements here and there, but overall the HJE900 are some really grand sounding in-ear phones. I can only imagine what Panasonic/Technics is capable of in future phones – when/if they get some more reputation for their in-ear phones, when/if people start to talk about them, to buy them, to recommend them.

These things really took me by surprise. Give them a try, they’re worth it.


  • Natural, laid-back, precise, detailed, punchy, dynamic, engaging, rich sound – real fun to listen to
  • Stellar build quality, one of the best built IEMs I’ve tried
  • User replaceable cables, little cable noise
  • No hiss with any MP3 player


  • Treble might be a bit sibilant with some material, but one can stuff some foam in the nozzle to tame it


I found them on Amazon Marketplace USA for less than $120, Amazon Germany has them for a much more expensive EUR 143.

Edited by dfkt - 2/12/11 at 4:00pm
post #2 of 599

Great review, dfkt, thanks!


They seem like a very nice set of iems. And I really like the good build quality as well. I might give them a try someday ^^

post #3 of 599

I also have the Panasonic RP-HJE900 Zirconia headphones and I like them. I bought them for about $125 (shipping and everything) from J&R Electronics in NYC via UPS.
Its about 3 months or more I have them and I am impressed by their bass punch, and by what the people name here as a "warmth" sound. They are very punchy but clear on bass, and they also have clear highs. Some mid range frequencies are muffled but adequate to the ears. Bass lovers will like these phones. They are so strong that they have no resonance, and that makes these phones very clear and crisp to hear. The zirconia element makes them very nice for audio frequency response.

post #4 of 599

got these for cheap

hope they are better than my mtpg

post #5 of 599

I remember these phones were pretty popular a couple months ago but that has faded of late. I was tempted to get them when they were around 110 but never got around to it. Now its around 130 plus tax for me since the store is local. I'll have to try them one of these days.

post #6 of 599

Very nice review, dfkt, and gorgeous pictures!

post #7 of 599

Thanks for the review, I have read about them in this forum, and now I'm even more impressed.


One thing, you said it is semi-open, how open does it feel?


I am asking because I hate the feeling of closeness, I get with IEM. Do you think it diminishes it to a level that it can be tolerated easily?


One thing, if I may: Can you please upload a picture with it fitted on your ear? I am asking because one never knows how it fits, and then you can't sleep with it on or so!

Edited by mcnoiserdc - 7/15/10 at 9:00am
post #8 of 599

Thorough review, as always.


I had a pair for a short time (two weeks, bought for a friend in France and to burn-in), and while they sounded okay to me, I always felt the highs were a little too harsh in the overall mix (as noted in the review), and I did try them with several tip combos and sources, and even with the foam mod. Even with that tryout, so to speak, I wasn't moved enough to buy them. To me, for another $30 or so, the Fischer Audio DBA-02s are a better value. Of course, the DBAs don't have the tank-like body and removable cable, two nice features. Anyway, just my two cents on these phones. I'd spend a little more and get the Fischers, if top-tier SQ in a mid-priced container is the ultimate goal.

Edited by slaters70 - 7/15/10 at 10:23am
post #9 of 599

Thanks for the review, and gorgeous pictures!


I got these two days ago and have them on right now. The one problem I have with them is the fit. Since you put on different tips I guess you didn't have that problem, but the tips seem to back out and can even fall out if you shake your head hard enough (although at that point I get headaches). Worn over the ear, they go in far enough, but I don't find them to be as comfortable as worn cable down.


Sound wise, I can't make a judgement yet, but they do sound spectacular so far.

post #10 of 599

I really like the design of these.

post #11 of 599

Great Review! Which reminds me... I have to finish my review that I started like... More than 4 months ago? XD


These are still my main headphones and despite having heard many more headphones since I purchased these, they are still my favorite.

As a note, the cables are fully compatible with Sleek Audio replacement cables. Unfortunately, one of my puppies chewed the right end of the Y-Split and so the sound cuts out every now and then. As such, I am using SA6 cables purchased from J&R. I haven't A/B'd them to hear the difference, but while there seemed to be a more refined sound with the old cables(the SA6 cablessound both slightly warmer and "thinner" to me, whatever that means =P), the new cables are nice because they allow for a slightly deeper fit in my ear, and are lighter so they stay in more easily.


post #12 of 599

Very nice review dfkt! I'm sold! Just ordered a pair.


One question, is it comfortable to sleep with these?



Napilopez, with regards to the SA cable replacement, how much are they?

Edited by NeedBalanceCtrl - 7/15/10 at 1:34pm
post #13 of 599

Yeah, a cool thing is the Sleek compatibility. So, a Kleer wireless Panasonic is useful to some people and quite affordable at ~$250 for both the HJE900 and wireless module.

post #14 of 599

'Twas 15 bucks for me in store; same prices I'm seeing online.

post #15 of 599
Thread Starter 
Originally Posted by NeedBalanceCtrl View Post

Very nice review dfkt! I'm sold! Just ordered a pair.


One question, is it comfortable to sleep with these?

Thank you. :)


Yes, I have no issues sleeping with them. My other comfy sleeping phones are the IE8 and the SE530, and the HJE are pretty much on par with those, comfort-wise.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Panasonic RP-HJE900 Zirconia Review