Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Are iPods a no-go for audiophiles?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Are iPods a no-go for audiophiles? - Page 9

post #121 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by KHansen View Post




Well the newer iPods have EQ's in it but just the stock ones.  iTunes does have it though.

 

Nothing is perfect haha

I think he was referring to a "customizable" one, like he stated. IE a 5 or 7 band EQ at least. 
 

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #122 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Spade View Post



I think he was referring to a "customizable" one, like he stated. IE a 5 or 7 band EQ at least. 
 


Yeah I know that's why I stated the stock EQ's such as the R&B, Bass Reducer, Bass Booster etc.

 

But you can create your own and it was explained last year (I haven't tried it yet with iTunes v9) in this thread. http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/399487/ipod-custom-eq-yes-it-can-be-done

post #123 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by KHansen View Post




Yeah I know that's why I stated the stock EQ's such as the R&B, Bass Reducer, Bass Booster etc.

 

But you can create your own and it was explained last year (I haven't tried it yet with iTunes v9) in this thread. http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/399487/ipod-custom-eq-yes-it-can-be-done

It seems many of the people in that thread say it doesn't work.
 

post #124 of 329

For those of you who say the preset EQ clips: Use MP3Gain, AACGain, or apply ReplayGain when converting FLAC to whatever (FB2K, dBpoweramp).

For those of you who don't like iPods: Get something else and stop yakkking.

post #125 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achmedisdead View Post



It seems many of the people in that thread say it doesn't work.
 


Haha didn't read it all the way through.... on the 8th post it does say that it is in fact impossible to get custom EQ's other than the 22 stock EQ's.  That's what I get haha.  But I'm just speculating now that a jailbroken iPod Touch or iPhone will have a app that creates a custom EQ.  (But that is too much work for a custom EQ imo)

 

Portable almost always means that it won't be ideal listening situations so a perfected EQ won't be the most of your worries.  The homeless man snoring next to you on the PATH from Hoboken to 23rd is.

post #126 of 329

If you're planning to use an LOD and amp I would recommend the Red Wine Audio iMod. Can make a iPod sound pretty clean.....

post #127 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by tolkencatholic View Post

If you're planning to use an LOD and amp I would recommend the Red Wine Audio iMod. Can make a iPod sound pretty clean.....


First, that applies to a Photo or a Video, not a Classic, Touch, or Nano (as stated on their website). Second, to do that mod you need to dish out a good amount of money. Third, that specialized LOD costs as much, if not more, than the iMod procedure itself. Not an easy decision unless you make 200k+ a year.

Of course you can always do it yourself, but you risk screwing it up. Hey. Just get the Classic and avoid the hassle.

post #128 of 329

 

Quote:
Third, that specialized LOD costs as much, if not more, than the iMod procedure itself. Not an easy decision unless you make 200k+ a year.

 

If you refer to specialized LOD as to those recommended for an iMod your right. But, there are options for "regular" iPods. I went for one of the options offered by Senstation. Audio quality is a notch or two above HO ( using an external amp, of course). My setup is pretty simple and on the cheap side: an iPod 5.5 G (240 Gbs), a Sendstation Pocketdock AV, Total Airhead and Shure 530 (I know, I'll create a signature soon. I am a noob here). I have the iPod for 3 years. So the investment has been around $1000 spread over 3 years. For my not so golden (or even silver) ears it is good enough.

post #129 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by leninwtigger View Post

 

 

If you refer to specialized LOD as to those recommended for an iMod your right. But, there are options for "regular" iPods. I went for one of the options offered by Senstation. Audio quality is a notch or two above HO ( using an external amp, of course). My setup is pretty simple and on the cheap side: an iPod 5.5 G (240 Gbs), a Sendstation Pocketdock AV, Total Airhead and Shure 530 (I know, I'll create a signature soon. I am a noob here). I have the iPod for 3 years. So the investment has been around $1000 spread over 3 years. For my not so golden (or even silver) ears it is good enough.


Now, see, you need to chain up the three points in my post. As the previous poster suggested (an iMod), to benefit from it you cannot use a regular LOD (keep reading): you need a capped LOD. If you buy that from ALO that is around $150 (haven't been there recently). For wires with caps? I'd say no way. You can use a regular LOD, but you will have to use a box of caps (such as the ALO Vcap Dock) after that. Bigger size, more expensive. Even no-er way. Then you can do it yourself and save anywhere from a boatload to a sh!tload of ca$h, but you risk screwing it up, both the Pod and the dock (although, granted, a dock costs $4 on the Bay). Running an iMod without DC filtering of some sort will FUBAR your downstream. Either this, or a Classic. Your choice.

post #130 of 329

I have a Sansa Fuze, a 3rd-gen Nano, and a Sony X (I picked up a serious strain of Head-Fi disease, which also explains why I used to have an AMP3). I bought the iPod before I contracted the dreaded ailment, thinking that anything but an iPod was second-rate. I picked up the Fuze cheap because it has an FM radio (useful in the gym where the TV sound is broadcast) and it cost about the same as an FM radio (the Fuze was on sale on amazon for very short money). Natural selection has relegated the Nano to the car, where road noise dominates. I use the Fuze for the gym and bike rides (FM a big plus), the Sony for serious listening (sounds better, built-in noise cancelling used when travelling).

 

I wish I had one of those cool car radios that fully integrates the iPod controls, I would enjoy that.  Can't beat the iPod for those kinds of accessories.

 

If friends ask me for a recommendation, I go with the Fuze. Of course my iPod is seriously out of date now, the model I own went extinct shortly after I bought it.

post #131 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by dana789 View Post

 

I wish I had one of those cool car radios that fully integrates the iPod controls, I would enjoy that.  Can't beat the iPod for those kinds of accessories.

 


"Get the best iPhone sound experience thanks to a digital USB Connection and a dedicated 24-Bit Burrbrown D/A converter. "

 

http://www.alpine-usa.com/product/view/ida-x305s/

 

The 303 is cheaper.

 

post #132 of 329



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3602 View Post




First, that applies to a Photo or a Video, not a Classic, Touch, or Nano (as stated on their website). Second, to do that mod you need to dish out a good amount of money. Third, that specialized LOD costs as much, if not more, than the iMod procedure itself. Not an easy decision unless you make 200k+ a year.

Of course you can always do it yourself, but you risk screwing it up. Hey. Just get the Classic and avoid the hassle.



I never stated that the iMod was cheap. The original question asked if the iPod was or wasn't a worthwhile source. I believe the iMod makes the iPod a worthwhile source. Besides you can always just use their special female dock and use whatever cable you like. Making it much cheaper. "200k+ a year" is an gross exageration. I'm a student who makes less than 10k. So relax....
 

post #133 of 329

Let's just agree that the iPod needs more money put into it that it is actually worth brand new to sound reasonably... Though you still have to deal with the prison life of iTunes, the lack of decent EQ (even the presets are bad... my S9 presets are actually distinguishable from each other) and the terrible format support.

post #134 of 329

tolkencatholic: 10K a year and an iMod is an easy decision for you. Whoa. Just whoa.

stevenswall: Well the standard EQ on Pods are quite bad, though not 'indistinguishable from each other' as you implied... and you don't need to put 'more' money into it, lots of high-quality IEMs (universal & custom) are driven comfortably by the Classic.

post #135 of 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenswall View Post

Let's just agree that the iPod needs more money put into it that it is actually worth brand new to sound reasonably... Though you still have to deal with the prison life of iTunes, the lack of decent EQ (even the presets are bad... my S9 presets are actually distinguishable from each other) and the terrible format support.


Although the S9 presets are much better, implying that the iPod's are horrid is a little harsh. The Lounge EQ is a subtle one that is not as extreme as the others IMO, and there are a few OK ones. However some of the bad ones like Piano, POP, Bass Boost, are still pretty bad, but I don't use EQ much. Also, I think if you use dBpoweramp, the iPod supports any codec you want

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Portable Source Gear

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Source Gear › Are iPods a no-go for audiophiles?