Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Paired with a Beta 22 - do I NEED a Buffalo 32?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Paired with a Beta 22 - do I NEED a Buffalo 32?

post #1 of 10
6/16/10 at 9:10am
Thread Starter 

Is it justifiable to pay ~$700 more over say, what I've been looking at right now - the Gamma 2 (under 400)? Exaggeration, hype and everything aside - is it worth it to pay substantially more and wait longer just for the superior DAC?

 

The Beta 22 is the triple channel, active ground version, if anyone is interested.

 

What about DIYing it? How much would it cost (assuming the cheapest possible enclosure that works?) What other parts do I need to source that isn't provided with the kit (assume that I also grab the power supply kit). Is it difficult? I can find some help through frirends and family, some of which are quite experienced in electronics.


I definitely don't want to spend that much, and I probably don't even have enough for a Buffalo 32 (unless I can DIY) after a Beta 22. It'd also be great if I could save it on headphones and A/Bing cables to see if I can really discern a difference.

Thanks in advance.

Reply
post #2 of 10
6/16/10 at 2:59pm

Personally I would. I mean come on, you are getting a very, very good amp. Might as well opt for a very, very good DAC  I would kill for a Buffalo 32 

Reply
post #3 of 10
6/19/10 at 3:42am

Knowing what I know now, I would build the Buffalo or Gamma first and let the amp wait 'till later.

Reply
post #4 of 10
6/19/10 at 10:41am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945 View Post

Knowing what I know now, I would build the Buffalo or Gamma first and let the amp wait 'till later.


Why is that? Please elaborate.

And I'll probably get them both commissioned from an experienced builder - I do plan to do some smaller DIY projects but it would be too much of a risk to botch such expensive projects.

Reply
post #5 of 10
6/20/10 at 6:50am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vergex2 View Post




Why is that? Please elaborate.

.


Because the best amp on the planet will not make a bad source better.

Team Source First FTW.
 

Reply
post #6 of 10
6/20/10 at 10:01am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945 View Post




Because the best amp on the planet will not make a bad source better.

Team Source First FTW.
 

 

Makes sense, but unfortunately it isn't applicable to my case. My only amps and sources are for portables only, and wouldn't be worth a monkey's toe for what I'm trying right now.
 

Reply
post #7 of 10
6/25/10 at 2:07am

What are you intending to drive with that setup?

Reply
post #8 of 10
6/25/10 at 2:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Joboto View Post

What are you intending to drive with that setup?


Dr. Dre Beats, of course. 

Reply
post #9 of 10
6/25/10 at 2:18am

Ah, yes, you'll want to budget at least 2000 each for source and amp.

Reply
post #10 of 10
6/25/10 at 5:11am
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945 View Post

Because the best amp on the planet will not make a bad source better.

Team Source First FTW.
 


and the best source in the world won't make the sound better if you're just gonna stick a crappy amp in front of it.

imo, sources have a steeper price/performance slope than a amplifier, so the moneys better spent on an amp first.

 

If it were me, the only reason I would choose to go with a Buffalo32 over the gamma2 is if I wanted the balanced output.

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Paired with a Beta 22 - do I NEED a Buffalo 32?