Ignorance is bliss.
Responses in bold. I've had enough of this guy, reason doesn't break through to him, so ad hominem happily included.
yes I don’t have much experience with HP’s recabling, but what does it matter? I could’ve the most extensive experience, but it would not matter, would it? you want scientific proofs, concrete evidence, etc. only when I can show that you’ll start to hear a difference, is that right? Well I’m afraid I can’t give you that. What I can give you is my opinion on the sound characteristic a specific cable has. And the opinions that some other users wrote about the cable which reflect pretty much everything I hear with the cable. I know it’s all placebo... lol
So basically you know nothing about the HD600, but are going to somehow recommend cables to the OP? How would you know anything about the sound signature of the headphone in question? How would you know which cable to recommend? Surely in your fantasy world, if the cable has a sonic signature it's going to affect the overall signature of the headphone. Basically, without knowing the HD600s you wouldn't be able to recommend anything, so I don't understand why you entered this thread in the first place, let alone had the balls to attack other posters who actually had experience with the 'phones. Don't conflate your fantasy world where cables make a difference and my requests for concrete data with your motivation to post. In your mind, cables make a difference based on your own experiences - yet ironically you have no experience with the HD600. This is not consistent.
ok, I checked the link in your signature, watched for about #9mins, then I just got bored, and stopped. Thanks wasting me #9mins. I usually take what “scientists” say with a pinch of salt. To me some scientists seem like religious fanatics. It’s all about proof – if it can’t be measured it’s not real, or something like that. And when they bump into something that cannot be explained they’ll make up some ridiculous theory for it. Fact! <---
This made me cringe as someone educated in science. Could you give me an example of such a 'ridiculous theory'? Perhaps you don't believe in gravity?
With that paragraph you revealed you have no idea how science works, no understanding of the scientific method, and suggested that because you found something boring it essentially wasn't true. I'm beginning to get indications of your education (or lack thereof). Unfortunately there's not much anyone can do to years of social conditioning.
you see, I’m not interested in hearing some dumbass scientific theory. I’d rather trust what I hear with my own ears. and what I hear is 100% true and real, as far as sound difference with cables is concerned. I’ve no doubts about it.
Random anti-science bollocks again. What you believe isn't necessarily true. I believe you're an imbecile - hopefully you can prove me wrong.
anyway, I’m sick already of the cable “debates”, so that's it for me. I'll let you get on with your little mission, and move on. so long
Good. You might be pleased to know you've converted me not to a believer in cables, but a believer in involuntary euthanasia for idiots.
Edited by Draca - 6/6/10 at 4:08am