I really wish I could afford a Predator right now... How much has it the increased bass? I find the triple.fi VERY bass shy and I hear RSAs are bass happy amps
. I haven't got the slightest clue how some describe the TF10 as having a V shaped response, its just treble with recessed mids in my opinion. Hah, sorry, Im really liking the emoticons.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Tags
Related Forum Threads
- Best $200 (or less) portable headphones for flying Last post on 8/17/11 at 7:19am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Confused with Shure SE215... Last post on 10/9/11 at 7:23am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Ultimate Ears’ Triple.fi 10 Pro vs. ? Last post on 8/17/11 at 7:28am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- best analytical IEM (ER4?) Last post on 9/14/11 at 7:41am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Best earphones for under $250? Last post on 4/22/11 at 2:47am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
Related Articles
-
Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
Edited on 5/7/10 | Contribute to this Article
-
Basic Guide To In Ear Canalphones
Edited on 3/22/12 | Contribute to this Article
Related Head Gear
Recent Reviews
-
it's about two weeks that i've bought them and i'm quiet satisfied with it ... first i wanted to buy the J3 but it's 3.3 AMOLED screen and good video playing was not needed!! it's low 16GB...
-
SEE PROS & CONS. NOTE: The clamping factor will obviously differ from person to person, but I'm surprised to find little mention of it, as it is the sole reason I'd never think twice about...
-
When I listened to the sound for the 1st time, I was hit by it. I was punched by the not-punchy-bass. I was hoping it would offer much better bass response than SE315.. equals to Klipsch Image...
-
Synopsis: The Aurisonics AS-1b is a very nice custom-fit monitor with a sound tuned for the needs of professional musicians performing on stage. It gives the listener a mid-centric sound that...
-
HiFiMAN HE400 By now I think most of us are familiar with the history behind the HiFiMAN HE-series headphones. What started with a single model has grown into a full...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Triple fi sounds much better amped? ER4P amped? - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
Gear mentioned in this thread:
- mesasone
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 433 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: Iowa City, IA
- Select All Posts By This User
The TF10 are bass shy? Maybe you're looking for something like the IE8 or Turbine Pro Gold. Bass shy is not a word I would use for the TF10s.
- High_Q
- Trader Feedback: +12
-
- offline
- 1,293 Posts. Joined 3/2010
- Location: Virginia, USA
- Select All Posts By This User
^Very true if isolated properly. Maybe isolation issues if not getting much bass?
Will a clip+ be able to power the TF10's?
What would be a good amp with the right synergy? Different price ranges appreciated :)
Thintking about a DIY amp but know nothing about it.
- airwax
- Trader Feedback: +4
-
- offline
- 333 Posts. Joined 9/2009
- Location: Philippines
- Select All Posts By This User
My rockboxed clip+ drives the TF10 pretty well. It's what I'm listening to right now while posting this.
- Young Spade
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,614 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: Florida
- Select All Posts By This User

I really wish I could afford a Predator right now... How much has it the increased bass? I find the triple.fi VERY bass shy and I hear RSAs are bass happy amps
. I haven't got the slightest clue how some describe the TF10 as having a V shaped response, its just treble with recessed mids in my opinion. Hah, sorry, Im really liking the emoticons.
It's not bass shy at all; how are you finding this? Maybe you're used to bloated or overexaggerated bass..... but that "V" shaped response is very slight and is a slight bump in the treble.
I agree. It's very punchy and although doesn't extend as low as other IEMs it's very good.
- mvw2
- Trader Feedback: +6
-
- offline
- 1,858 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Location: Rochester-Mankato, MN
- Select All Posts By This User
Unfortunately, when you start to get to some of these really good earphones, you can literally destroy their capability by using poor equipment. If you run a decently compressed audio file through a mediocre playing device and off mediocre wattage, you will very much get a mediocre presentation. Crappy earphones can't produce a good enough sound to get better with better hardware, but good earphones can and do scale well to the quality of the source material and hardware used. You pretty much are forced to run high bitrate or lossless recordings, a good DAC, and decent amperage to just get a good enough input to actually see what the earphone is really capable of.
The TF10 doesn't need much wattage to run. It really has very little need. However, if you run a really weak source, you will always run into problems. An example is the UM3X. Off my laptop's line out it lacks the wattage needed to output bass well. Bass notes are muddled and incoherent at moderate output levels. It's just a mess of noise. Once amped, the bass snaps together and everything is clean, separated, and meaningful. I bring up the UM3X because I don't see nearly as much impact off low wattage from the TF10.
The TF10 has a thick and in some perception veiled note. It is encompassing and enveloping, not open and airy. This won't change from better amperage.
The gains you will see are pretty specific. A better audio track, a better source, and better amperage will give you key benefits. These benefits are improved dynamic range and energy of note, better control and separation in low frequencies, improved clarity, detail, separation, stage presentation from the better audio information and player device processing. The gains can at times be somewhat dramatic. Some earphones are more sensitive to what you use. Some are not. Good examples of earphones that scale well are the UM3X ( and most likely the W3) and the RE252. I personally don't feel the TF10 scales a lot. However, it does have outstanding upper frequency clarity and will scale in the quality of sound along with the quality of the source information. Because it is bright and detailed, it will be more glaring in showing you bitrate compression and glitches in the audio. The bass is prominent and with good power and will scale to some degree off the power available.
- Young Spade
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,614 Posts. Joined 7/2008
- Location: Florida
- Select All Posts By This User
^I agree with you 100 percent. Well said man. And I can say the exact same thing when listening to my UM3Xs. Plugging them into the Rx and LO from the T51 it's a whole new phone than just the HO of the DAP.
- High_Q
- Trader Feedback: +12
-
- offline
- 1,293 Posts. Joined 3/2010
- Location: Virginia, USA
- Select All Posts By This User
Why do I have a feeling that ER4P needs a strong amp? I compared TF10 and ER4P with my tube amp, and ER4P sounded much better IMO. With my sony X(DAP, low powered amp), TF10 had more punch, it handles low power well. The ER4P has lower sensitivity than TF10, volume has to be raised and it doesn't sound as dramatic as the TF10 unamped. For now, I conclude that ER4P are better sounding phones properly amp.
Edit: My conclusion is based on comparing with a tube amplifier, when I tested with portable solid state, it was the opposite, TF10 sounded better.
Edited by High_Q - 6/4/10 at 10:50pm
- dizzyraider
- Trader Feedback: +20
-
- offline
- 258 Posts. Joined 5/2010
- Location: Orange County, CA
- Select All Posts By This User
From what I read, Clip+ should have no trouble at all driving TF10s as well as other larger cans as well. I personally run mine with the Mini3 and it really sound fantastic.
- radioactive28
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 152 Posts. Joined 7/2006
- Location: Singapore
- Select All Posts By This User

Why do I have a feeling that ER4P needs a strong amp? I compared TF10 and ER4P with my tube amp, and ER4P sounded much better IMO. With my sony X(DAP, low powered amp), TF10 had more punch, it handles low power well. The ER4P has lower sensitivity than TF10, volume has to be raised and it doesn't sound as dramatic as the TF10 unamped. For now, I conclude that ER4P are better sounding phones properly amp.
I'm not sure about a strong amp, but running the ER4S direct off my H320, and later running it out of my old Little Dot Micro+, there seems to be some positive effect. Better bass, better clarity (there have been complaints that the ER4S didn't handle busy passages all that well, which I found to be true), and more treble at roughly the same volume. Still trying to convince myself it's not the placebo effect though.
Edited by radioactive28 - 6/4/10 at 9:16am
- mvw2
- Trader Feedback: +6
-
- offline
- 1,858 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Location: Rochester-Mankato, MN
- Select All Posts By This User
The ER4S does need a good amp. It was pretty noticeable when I only had my FiiO E5. I had the ER4S and OK1 at the time, and they both really seemed to want more power. I now have a Meier 2Move and it's more obvious how much power some of these earphones really want. The IE8 is another example that will soak up a lot of wattage if you've got it despite being OK off low wattage.
I'm not sure if the benefit is there for the ER4P given it's designed for lower wattage applications. The ER4 simply is not a dynamic earphone. It is thick and textured, but it is also tame without the explosiveness and shear energy of some other earphones. It might be a case of you trying to get something out of the earphone that simply doesn't exist at the scale you would like to see.
I tend to suggest people run a very robust amp despite the cost of them. A good amp and good DAC or source player is key to getting the best out of these very good earphones. It's been forever since I've ever used my E5. There just isn't a point to it. I will run everything I buy off my 2Move because it offers the better source and as much wattage as I'll ever need. It doesn't matter if the specific earphone needs that power or not. A current good and very versatile amp would be the Practical Devices XM5 and offers a lot of flexibility and some upgradability (done cheaper via digikey). These kinds of amps aren't cheap, but they'll give you some of the best hardware available for converting the source file into audio. With cheap earphones, this isn't a big deal. Cheap stuff in many cases lacks enough fidelity to show enough detail to distinguish the quality of information. However, with good hardware, the fidelity is there, and this stuff becomes noticeable. You get to the point where you're doing audible damage to the source information simply from the playing device you use and the amping method you use.
I don't think an amp should make much a difference for either of these phones (triple fi and er-4P), UNLESS the player is too weak (which is unlikely as both these phones are easily driven). You will get some slight coloration, probably. But huge, objective improvement? I highly doubt it.
@mvw2
The last thing I would call the er-4P is "thick and textured."
Edited by Antony6555 - 6/4/10 at 10:21am
- High_Q
- Trader Feedback: +12
-
- offline
- 1,293 Posts. Joined 3/2010
- Location: Virginia, USA
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:

I'm not sure if the benefit is there for the ER4P given it's designed for lower wattage applications. The ER4 simply is not a dynamic earphone. It is thick and textured, but it is also tame without the explosiveness and shear energy of some other earphones. It might be a case of you trying to get something out of the earphone that simply doesn't exist at the scale you would like to see.
Yes, I think so. I was expecting ER4P to have alot of potential, and after doing more listening tests comparing TF10 and ER4P by amping(this time with portable solid state, previous post I tested with tube amp), I discovered that TF10 has the greater potential to benefit when amped. Amp tightened up the sound coming out of TF10, sound is much more explosive, but the ER4P did not benefit much from amping. Thats with portable solid state amps(D10, CMOY 9v). On the other hand, when I amped them with tube, ER4P sounded better(my previous post when I said ER4P sounded better is after comparing with tube amps).
From this comparison, I discovered that Sony X internal amp is still not powerful enough to driver TF10 to its potential.
Edited by High_Q - 6/4/10 at 11:15pm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Triple fi sounds much better amped? ER4P amped?
Recent Discussions
- › Im gonna DIY a Hybrid-Driver IEM, yet i've 2 problems~ help 1 minute ago
- › Comparing some of the finest headphones: Sennheiser HD 600, HD... 2 minutes ago
- › Ultrasone Pro 900 Appreciation Thread 2 minutes ago
- › VSONIC GR07 Impressions & Appreciation Thread 2 minutes ago
- › Building Custom Wood Over-Ear Headphones 2 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD 700: Officially Unveiled at CES 2012! 3 minutes ago
- › Asus BDS-700, oppo on a budget? 3 minutes ago
- › bad trader!! crap, i need help!!! 3 minutes ago
- › Review: Fischer Audio FA-003 - a neutral champ! 3 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD 598 vs Astro A40?? 4 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
- › Pioneer SE MJ31 by jojexy
- › Grado SR60i Headphones by Smiling Jack
- › Final Audio Design Adagio V by SpringBiscuit
- › Matrix Quattro Dac by shipsupt
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map










