or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Woo WA6 SE vs. WA22
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Woo WA6 SE vs. WA22 - Page 2

post #16 of 22

Sorry to wake this thread up again, but I was wondering about actual sonic differences between Wo 6se and the Wa22.. I've been reading through all the forums, but nobody has given a detailed answer about the actual sonic difference in the amps.. Just the reply from Jack.. "WA22 is better if the source if balanced, if not WA6SE is better..."


Is there anbody out there who has owned both of the amps at length,  who can help?





post #17 of 22

So glad to see this thread revived. I would love to know the answer to this as well. 


I have also searched for comparisons and difference between the WA22 and the WA5LE but have not found any true write-ups. Most of have anecdotal comments but it would be really helpful to get some real insight.

post #18 of 22
Originally Posted by rydenfan View Post

So glad to see this thread revived. I would love to know the answer to this as well. 


I have also searched for comparisons and difference between the WA22 and the WA5LE but have not found any true write-ups. Most of have anecdotal comments but it would be really helpful to get some real insight.


Well, I have owned both.  I had a WA5 for about 6 months.  Bought it intending it to be my primary speaker amp as well as headamp.  Couldn't find any high efficiency speakers that I liked, so sold the WA5 and replaced it with a Cary SLI-80 and a WA22.  I have had the 22 now for about four days.  I am no reviewer but will try to help you out a little bit.  The WA5 is extremely dynamic, punchy, fast, and has an "effortless" kind of sound.  To my ears, not an extremely "tubey" or warm sound but extremely transparent, clear and DYNAMIC without ever being bright.  You can really sense the power (or current) behind the music.   Very, very nice!  And did I mention dynamic?  


The biggest difference I have noticed with the WA22 so far is that it is a little warmer and and a touch more euphonic.  It is more responsive to tube rolling though.  It can be almost lush sounding with the 5998's.  With the 7236, it is a little closer in sound to the WA5 but a touch less dynamic maybe.  It's subtle though.  (I have tried 6080, 7236, and 5998's)  I am using a different dac now with the WA22 - a W4S Dac-2 where I was using a EE minimax with the WA5 so that may skew my impressions a little.  Headphones are all the same with both amps, but not the HE-6 with the WA22.


If I had the experience and writing skills of some of the folks here, I guess I would write a more extensive article but hopefully this helps you a little.


post #19 of 22

Old thread, but reviving in anticipation of my recently purchased WA22, which may (or may not?) replace my 6SE.


Bought it because I use a balanced source for some listening - a Sony HAP1EZ - which is said to sound much better in balanced output than in single ended. But I've gotten into vinyl recently, and love the sound of my table through the 6SE.


Stay tuned for impressions.

post #20 of 22

My WA22 showed up today, courtesy of a fellow Head-Fi'er. It's been previously modded with Jupiter copper capacitors and a Furutech IEC. I listened for a few hours to both vinyl and digital sources, single ended only, with lots of swapping of tubes, cables, headphones, and such. I am awaiting a set of balanced cables to connect my Sony via its balanced outputs, and I'll post more thoughts, but here's a few very initial impressions using LCD3s and HD650s. Both amps had stock tubes except for the Princess Sophia substitution.


1. The WA22 sounds quite different than the 6SE. It is faster, cleaner and clearer on the top end, but lacks some of the low end of the 6SE (both compared using the Sophia Princess 274). The midrange is wonderful, but not at all "tube sounding" on the top end. Not quite sure yet if this is an overall good thing, but I am enjoying hearing all the detail.


2. The WA22 is very revealing of changes like tubes and cables. For example, I swapped my usual Foundation Research LC2 cable (a power cable with a high pass filter) out for my Cards Golden Reference AC cables. Clearly heard the difference and preferred the Foundation Research. Swapped the stock 5AU4 for the Sophia Princess and heard differences much more clearly than with the 6SE.


3. The 6SE has a more forgiving sound, warmer but darker on the top end, yet nice and hefty on the bottom end. Everything I hooked up to the 6SE sounded warm and musical, whereas the WA22 seems more clinical.


4. I need to experiment with tubes - looking for something that is a tad warmer on top and with some low end heft. But...I don't want to lose the definition that the WA22 has over the 6SE. While the 6SE's bass was fatter sounding than the WA22, I heard much more low end definition via the WA22.


5. Less gain with the WA22 - on certain songs it was cranked to the 1-2oclock position where the 6SE never went past 11 o'clock.


Tunes used to compare included: Alan Toussaint/Egyptian Fantasy, Al Green/Jesus is Waiting, Bob Dylan/House of the Rising Sun, JJ Cale/Cherry Street, and Muddy Waters' Folk Singer album on 180g vinyl.


This thread indicates the WA22's strength is with balanced sources, so I'll have more impressions once my XLR's arrive.

Edited by davehg - 9/11/16 at 11:19am
post #21 of 22

I received a pair of Cardas Light XLR cables and spent the night listening, trading off between digital and vinyl.


Like everyone says, running the WA22 with a balanced source makes a big difference. The more clinical sound on single ended gave way to more detailed, natural, and just plain musical sound on the balanced cables. While I am sure the Cardas added their own sweetness (certainly compared with the Acoustic Zen silver cables), the balanced route gave me much better gain (now at 11'oclock max volume instead of 1 o'clock), quieter background, more detail, and more impact on the bass. I am really thrilled with amp now, and it sounds more like I anticipated it to be.


On the 6SE, I never completely enjoyed the HD650's- the LCD3's were a much better pairing. On the WA22, however, the HD650's just sing - I think this amp was specially made for the Sennheisers. Not to say the LCD's were any slouch - I still preferred them overall, but the WA22 made the Sennheiser's sound way more musical than I've heard them on any other amp.


I switched over to vinyl for a while - wow! I played my wife a cut of Muddy's Water's Little Schoolgirl, and she was floored by the fidelity. At half priced Books I found a John Lee Hooker album and a Del Shannon Runaway album, and popped those on too - amazing the fidelity you hear in the early 60's recordings.


I've got a few tubes coming to roll based on the WA22 tube rolling thread, and I am sure the sound will change even more, but right now, pretty happy where the WA22 has landed. A balanced digital source is pretty essential to getting it to better the 6SE, and I agree with the other comments about the 6SE being a better choice if you are running RCA's instead of XLRs.

post #22 of 22

i used to own both of them, personally like wa22 with we421a much more.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Woo WA6 SE vs. WA22