Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › How much of a realistic improvment from soundcard to Dac/Amp?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

How much of a realistic improvment from soundcard to Dac/Amp?

post #1 of 73
Thread Starter 

I know I have been told a few times that a Amp/Dac combo like the Audio-gd Fun will give me great results.  But just how much better is it compared to a standard soundcard or something like the $50-$100 range soundcards.  I know its hard to be objective, but id like some scale of what to expect.  As an example, if on a scale of 0-10, we set the soundcard at 1 of possible sound quality.  What will a Dac/Amp in general be?  Will I move to a 2,4,6?  Just want some idea on how much better it is.

post #2 of 73

Well if you have a decent DAC (soundcard) already, then adding a good amp would be better than buying another DAC. But say going from an unmodded X-Fi music to the FUN will sound much better, probably 2x-3x (that's really subjective though.) With a good pair drivers you'll notice substantial improvement.

post #3 of 73

It should be a huge improvement in clarity and bass.  Its like of like looking out side through a screen door, and then just opening the door.  Yes everything is the same, but now you can see/hear all the little things, and the amp wont run out of gas with authoritative bass.

 

The main upgrade will be the fact the amp (if the sound card even has one) will have a + - voltage supply so it will go directly from the amp chip to your cans.  With the PC sound card most are cap coupled on the outputs to make it work with everything, and shorting it out wont blow up the card.

post #4 of 73
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by slytown View Post

Well if you have a decent DAC (soundcard) already, then adding a good amp would be better than buying another DAC. But say going from an unmodded X-Fi music to the FUN will sound much better, probably 2x-3x (that's really subjective though.) With a good pair drivers you'll notice substantial improvement.


I only have ATH-A700's.  Are these good enough to notice a difference?

post #5 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoltan99 View Post


 


I only have ATH-A700's.  Are these good enough to notice a difference?


Yes.

post #6 of 73
Thread Starter 

Hi guys, So I got the Fun Basic.  I was really excited to get it and all.  After a day of comparing back and forth on lossless flac rips, I honestly don't see much improvement over my motherboard's on-board Realtek HD sound card.  The only noticed a difference in downloaded TV shows, where the actors voices sounded much cleaner and real life like.   I have gone back and forth on the music, doing blind trials and I can never tell the two apart.  I am connecting the FUN through my onboard toslink out via included cable or with the included USB cable.  I am not trolling here, it may seem Like I am, but I am not.  I have a general interest in this.

post #7 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoltan99 View Post

Hi guys, So I got the Fun Basic.  I was really excited to get it and all.  After a day of comparing back and forth on lossless flac rips, I honestly don't see much improvement over my motherboard's on-board Realtek HD sound card.  The only noticed a difference in downloaded TV shows, where the actors voices sounded much cleaner and real life like.   I have gone back and forth on the music, doing blind trials and I can never tell the two apart.  I am connecting the FUN through my onboard toslink out via included cable or with the included USB cable.  I am not trolling here, it may seem Like I am, but I am not.  I have a general interest in this.


Interesting.  I just want to confirm something real quick.  This would be the 'optimal' FUN routing.

 

Toslink --> FUN --> Headphone jack on the FUN.

 

And what are you using to output music?  If you're on Vista/Win7, try Foobar2000 with the WASAPI plugin set to your onboard SPDIF output.

post #8 of 73
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hybrys View Post


Interesting.  I just want to confirm something real quick.  This would be the 'optimal' FUN routing.

 

Toslink --> FUN --> Headphone jack on the FUN.

 

And what are you using to output music?  If you're on Vista/Win7, try Foobar2000 with the WASAPI plugin set to your onboard SPDIF output.

Yes, I am running it via the toslink out from my motherboard, into the Fun and listening via the headphone jack on the front.   I am using Linux, and outputting the music via various applications like rythmbox or vlc.  I set the spdif out in my sound preferences, I choose "Digital Stereo (IEC958) Output".

 

I'm not saying it sounds bad, there is just little realistic improvement that I notice compared to my onboard.  I remember when my brother got the Ibasso D2 boa, we tested it vs an iPod and the computer and we were really able to hear parts of the songs that weren't there before.  I though this would be like that.  maybe the Realtek onboard is just that good?
 

post #9 of 73

Realteks are pretty good, but it still should be a noticeable improvement.  That said, it might be something to do with the audio engine.  Maybe asking in the Linux for Sound topic, in this forum, for tips on bitperfect players?  If you don't notice a significant difference, you CAN return the unit in 30 days, just pay shipping.  (If it came from Audio-GD/a dealer)

post #10 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoltan99 View Post

Hi guys, So I got the Fun Basic.  I was really excited to get it and all.  After a day of comparing back and forth on lossless flac rips, I honestly don't see much improvement over my motherboard's on-board Realtek HD sound card.  The only noticed a difference in downloaded TV shows, where the actors voices sounded much cleaner and real life like.   I have gone back and forth on the music, doing blind trials and I can never tell the two apart.  I am connecting the FUN through my onboard toslink out via included cable or with the included USB cable.  I am not trolling here, it may seem Like I am, but I am not.  I have a general interest in this.



How much time have you given the device to burn in?  It will also take you a little while to get used to the new signature.

post #11 of 73
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROBSCIX View Post





How much time have you given the device to burn in?  It will also take you a little while to get used to the new signature.

Well I didnt burn it in all to much.  According to the audio-gd site they come pre burned in with over 100 hrs of burn in.  It would take me a very long time to reach 100 hrs.
 

post #12 of 73

Just checking.  Many times it takes a person awhile to get used to a new signature...  If you just do a quick listen you will not hear the differences right off the bat it takes awhile for some.

post #13 of 73
Thread Starter 
so how many hours of total burn in should I do prior to juding the unit.
post #14 of 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoltan99 View Post

so how many hours of total burn in should I do prior to juding the unit.


Depends.  Some say 50-100 hours.

post #15 of 73
Originally Posted by Hybrys View Post

Realteks are pretty good

 

This made my day..."those who know don't speak, and those who speak don't know"

 

Realtek RMAA: http://www.mediafire.com/file/tuy3myzu1my/%5BMME%5D%20Realtek%20ALC888.zip

 

a proper external DAC on a DPS: http://www.firestone.idv.tw/rmaa/spitfire.htm

 

Originally Posted by Zoltan99 View Post

so how many hours of total burn in should I do prior to juding the unit.


a year or two? Audio-GD is way overhyped on head-fi...you've just learned it the hard way, don't believe everything you read next time.


Edited by leeperry - 6/3/10 at 2:53pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Computer Audio
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › How much of a realistic improvment from soundcard to Dac/Amp?